Jump to content
1234

Peculiar problem with exposure indication

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

For unknown reason(s) an oddity is happening with indicated exposure times seen in viewfinder. After making an exposure, for the next two exposures there is no variation in indicated exposure time when panning about with camera. After the third exposure, the indication again varies properly as you pan about different scenes. Then repeats. As if there were an unwanted exposure lock mode in effect for 2nd and 3rd shot of a 3 shot sequence..

Cannot find any obvious settings error likely to be the cause. The bracketing is set to 0.

Tried to reload latest firmware but it "completes" in about two seconds so never happened. Does Leica determine the actual present checksum of the loaded firmware and decide that a reload is not necessary??

What am I missing here? Thanks.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which mode were your using? S or C?

Did you happen to half press the shutter button?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello. No, I am not keeping it half pressed. After the first exposure, that exposure time appears in viewfinder. I pan around and it stays constant. If I do press button half way, the displayed time remains the same but a dot appears to left of the time. I can turn the dot on and off by half pressing the button. After two more exposures, the exposure time again updates with panning, and locks when pressing half way.  Then the cycle repeats.

Is there a way to reload firmware when the same version is already installed??

As it stands, I have to turn off and turn on the camera between shots...

Edited by 1234
Added last sentence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have noticed a similar problem with mine. I have to switch it off to clear the problem.

I have also noticed that the indicated speeds in the viewfinder when shooting manually don’t always match those on the shutter speed dial.

I should send it back to Wetzlar, but don’t want to be without a camera for months.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Thanks for your comments Andy. I wrote to Leica in NJ with a  few questions. There is no way to reload a suspected defective firmware installed in the camera..... But the good news was that trying what they suggested, resetting the camera, worked. I had never had to do any reset (and had forgotten it existed as a Menu item) because turning off/on and/or removing/installing the battery solved everything else. So now it works as it should. Mystery remains on how the camera got into its faulty state.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Alberti
      I recently bought an Orion-18 28mm F5.6 lens and coded it as Summaron. The lens has the same structure. [I like it for its compactness and low 'profile'.] I use it on my M240 but bought it for Monochrom.
      However, I notice some small tinge of purple on the top of this image in the sky.  Should I use an IR/UV filter on this lens like on the M8? The Orion accepts 40.5 mm filters. 
      This reminds me of the M8. I remember JaapV once said the M240 has some IR issues. And would [sometimes] need a light IR filter. I tried the M8 filters by Leica on the M240 but did not like the result. Probably way too strong.
      The following filters in 40.5 mm are available: 
      370-670nm  400-700nm  Which of the above is do you think appropriate?

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By UltraDan
      So I just picked up an M240 and wanted to ask current users - how do people shoot these to get the best results ? Do you under or overexpose the files? I'm using uncompressed DNG is it noticeable over the compressed files? 
      Thanks for any info. 

      Dan
       
    • By Shashinka
      Apologies if this topic is already in the system by me, but for some reason I could not find what I had posted.
      Anyway the issue I seem to be having since updating the firmware to v2.0 is that I have had a couple of crashes, or my camera locking up.  The on/off button does nothing, the OLED display and LCD are still on.  The only remedy to reset is to remove the battery.  So far its happened 3 times.  Anybody else experiencing this?
    • By Shashinka
      I wonder if anyone else if experiencing the SL2 freezing, no response, even if I switch off the OLED display and LCD panel still show information.  This only seems to have happened after I updated to the latest firmware V2.0.  The only action is to remove the battery and then start again.  This has happened 2-3 times in the last week or so.  So not immediately after the update, which is slightly more concerning.  
    • By UltraDan
      Question to those that have used or have both of the above cameras - is there much IQ difference between the two? I'm guessing that the M10 just has slightly better ISO performance? 
       
      looking at both of these and struggling to find a reason to pay the extra for the M10 other than it's the latest and greatest. 
       
      thanks
       
×
×
  • Create New...