Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

In April 2015,  before Adobe adopted a subscription-only policy, I bought a copy of Adobe Lightroom.  In April 2016 I upgraded to a new MacBook.  When I transferred files and programs to it, Lightroom would not work and I had to download it again from the Adobe website.  I did not download the most recent version of Lightroom; I downloaded the version I had purchased and owned outright.  Adobe made it needlessly complicated to do so, so much so that I had to make repeated attempts and needed to document all my steps before I finally succeeded.  I suspected that they were trying to induce me to subscribe.  In March 2020 I upgraded my computer once again, and once again I was obliged to download Lightroom from the Adobe website.  I referred to the procedures I had previously documented and easily downloaded Lightroom.  As before, I downloaded the version which I had purchased and owned, not the most recent version.  Adobe then advised me that I needed to download an installer and referred me to the appropriate installer program for my version of Lightroom.  I downloaded this, only to receive an error message that the installer and the program it was trying to install were incompatible - the program was 64-bit, while the installer was 32-bit.

Colour me cynical, but I do not believe that this incompatibility was an accident, I do not believe that I am the first Lightroom owner to experience this problem, and I do not believe that Adobe is unaware of this problem.  I had no success getting around this roadblock, and so can no longer use Lightroom.  I now refuse to use Adobe and instead use Apple “Photos” which came free and pre-installed with my Mac.  For my modest needs, it is adequate.

Have any others had a similar experience, and have you found a workaround?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are trying to install 5 1/2 years old legacy software on a 2020 computer. It is hardly a surprise that it is troublesome installing. The best thing to do is to let the Adobe helpdesk (use the chat function) install it on your computer. If that doesn't work I think that it is end of the line and you will have to look for alternatives.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Peter

I upgraded my 2013 Macbook Pro to Catalina 10.15.5  this morning.   My Lightroom version 6.14 already on the Macbook is a long installed stand-alone non-subscription version acquired at the time of my M9-P

Reading the content of this thread prompted me to fire up Lightroom and check.    It seems to fully work (except for the Lightroom Mobile feature that has always required a LR CC subscription.

Can't explain your findings but I wouldn't rush into a software upgrade until I was absolutely sure that it was necessary.   

Regards

Gordon

Link to post
Share on other sites

I absolutely agree re the newfound way to rip everybody off by requiring a "subscription" to use a program.  I also refuse to participate and quit using Adobe photo programs quite a while ago.  I was a big Apple Aperture user and switched to Adobe after Apple abandon aperture and left us in the lurch.  But Adobe's subscription policy ended that and I found  that Apple Photos do fine for anything I need nowadays.  I still pretty much discard any pic that didn't come out of the camera as I intended/hoped rather than futz around with putting lipstick on a pig. ;)

Edited by Mikep996
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I have a different experience with Adobe Customer Support. My 2010 MacPro (upgraded) still runs High Sierra for various reasons. The 2020 CC programs run flawlessly. However, somehow the desktop app got broken and I could not repair it. The gentleman from India took three hours uninstalling and deleting files that had accumulated over a decade and reinstalled the app. I don't find the subscription a rip-off. It has saved me about double the price in upgrades.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, but I think you guys are missing out. LrC (Lightroom Classic) - the subscription version- has a load of enhancements over LR6 and is well worth the subscription .You are then set for all future upgrades to hardware and future LrC upgrades. IMHO of course!

Edited by pedaes
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed. Complain to Apple. I find the 10 buck a month cost.... for LR Classic AND Photoshop combined... an absolute bargain.  Peanuts compared to everything else I spend on my overall photographic needs.  We’re Leica users, right?  To each his own.

Jeff

Edited by Jeff S
Link to post
Share on other sites

to:  Hey You

You state that you have a newish 64 bit system.   So do I on my 7 year old Macbook Pro.  See my earlier post.     Standalone  LR6 on my Macbook Pro continues to work after today's OS upgrade.    I haven't had to do any re-installation.    I pay nothing (original free Leica offer)and never have.  Why are some responders pointing to the problems with 32bit.    In your particular case (and mine) its irrelevant.

However, if you de-installed and now need to re-install, the original installer program is possibly 32 bit and may be the only portion you need to acquire.  Adobe should be able to provide that.  

I wont be paying unless and until absolutely necessary.  The additional features of CC don't interest me.

So.   To repeat, I can confirm that a pre-installed LR6 standalone version continued to work under the new Catalina OS released today.  I'm using it right now!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, lucerne said:

to:  Hey You

I wont be paying unless and until absolutely necessary.  The additional features of CC don't interest me.

 

 

LR Classic no longer includes the designation CC, and has no requirement for cloud storage.  I use it with my same disk storage.  For me, the added controls compared to LR 6, especially additional local adjustment tools, are well worth the cost.  It has reduced my need for Photoshop, and the $120 per year for the two programs actually saves me some money compared to the former standalone upgrades, and new camera/lens updates are immediate along with any other improvements. I spend over twice this on a new camera battery. 
 

Jeff

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats a different matter Jeff and purely down to personal preference..   The original point is that the original installation does work. 

Thanks for your comments on cost which may be relevent to some on the forum. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, lucerne said:

to:  Hey You

You state that you have a newish 64 bit system.   So do I on my 7 year old Macbook Pro.  See my earlier post.     Standalone  LR6 on my Macbook Pro continues to work after today's OS upgrade.    I haven't had to do any re-installation.    I pay nothing (original free Leica offer)and never have.  Why are some responders pointing to the problems with 32bit.    In your particular case (and mine) its irrelevant.

However, if you de-installed and now need to re-install, the original installer program is possibly 32 bit and may be the only portion you need to acquire.  Adobe should be able to provide that.  

I wont be paying unless and until absolutely necessary.  The additional features of CC don't interest me.

So.   To repeat, I can confirm that a pre-installed LR6 standalone version continued to work under the new Catalina OS released today.  I'm using it right now!

 

Not only extra features. Improved algorithms = improved image quality. Noticeable, I might add

  • Thanks 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't strike me as unreasonable to expect to be able to run five and a half year old software on a new computer. Over the almost two decades that I worked for my last major client, I replaced my computer in 2001, 2004, and 2014, and switched operating systems from Windows 2000 to XP and then to Windows 7. For most of that time I used Microsoft Office 2000 as my main working tool, and still do. The software I used for military threat modelling until I retired was written in 2011, and ran happily on my two most recent machines and under Win 2000, and XP. It still runs OK under 64 bit Windows 7, as does most of the software I've purchased over the last 15 years.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I no longer use Lightroom and have switched to Exposure X5 and will upgrade to the new version X6 which is due out soon, so don't really have a dog in this fight.  However, out of interest I tried to install LR5 today on my Big Sur beta and guess what, it works fine.

I wonder why Adobe changed the installer architecture which in effect crippled LR6 on newer 64bit versions of macOS when they had a perfectly good 64bit installer for LR5?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...