Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi guys 

Soooo, I got this very goofy problem with my M10. 
When I have my Pentax-l 43/1.9 special (M39 thread) via an adapter on my M10 every time I am in bright light surroundings, LV or EVF just switches off by itself. When indoor for example no such phenomena. 
It’s very annoying. Previously I had M240 and no such issues. 
Any thoughts? Could it be the adapter? 
Gracias in advance. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

when the bright light hit the lens ensor on the M10 body the EVF switches off. 

You schuld use a adapter that covers the sensor

 

i used a peace of black paper - that helped:-)

but I used it for just a few test shots

 

greetings from Nuremberg

Michell

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Fontan said:

Thank you for the tip but hm . . . .  I am not sure what you mean. Adapter that covers the sensor???

Hi, I have the same issue when I mount an MS Optics 24mm Aporia to my M10-p (it's a very small lens). The problem is that the lens does not fully cover the mount, so there is light that leaks in in the gap between the lens and the mount where the six-bit code reader is. If it detects light, it'll switch off live view because it assumes that that means no lens is installed on the camera. If I cover the gap fully with my finger, live view won't siwtch off in bright sunlight. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, brandnew2 said:

Hi, I have the same issue when I mount an MS Optics 24mm Aporia to my M10-p (it's a very small lens). The problem is that the lens does not fully cover the mount, so there is light that leaks in in the gap between the lens and the mount where the six-bit code reader is. If it detects light, it'll switch off live view because it assumes that that means no lens is installed on the camera. If I cover the gap fully with my finger, live view won't siwtch off in bright sunlight. 

Ahhhhh I see. A beautiful explanation! Thank you that!  Lemme take a look here. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This happens when you use a 39toM adapter that has a cutout just where the lens code sensor elements are located in the mount, resulting in ambient lighting being able to reach these and causd this error. It's not really a light leak but a design feature of the adapter so that it doesn't obstruct the infinity lock of some older screw mount lenses.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

For my M10 and 1951 Leitz 35 f:3.5 (LTM)  I've just located a (rare)  KIPON  LTM to M adaptor (on Eb///) which has a shorter cutout and covers the lens code sensors at all times..  (it also has pits to allow permanent marking/coding of the LTM lens)  . This method supports your EXIF record.     Alternatively however, you can also stop the sensing by switching it off in the menu.  You should buy the KIPON or similar  which matches your lens focal lengths.  Commonly 35-135.  

 

The Infinity Lock is still functional.

 

 

 

Edited by lucerne
Link to post
Share on other sites

Tom

What evidence do you have for such a statement.  have you handled both.   What quality deficiencies did you observe.
Dont be fooled.  There may be some poorly made products but the kipon is fully profiled and well finished.   Its not the cheapest and it does what its supposed to do.   The Rayqual is very overpriced.   
What do get for the extra cost?   Nothing!   Its a single pressing.  Once its fitted to the lens youll not  need to touch it again.

Edited by lucerne
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well - I tried to cover it up and so on, but it is just hit and miss, so I ordered another one adapter from K&F.

https://www.kentfaith.com/KF06.277_m39-50mm-75mm-lenses-to-leica-m-camera-mount-adapter?gclid=Cj0KCQjw3ZX4BRDmARIsAFYh7ZLpDjHdl6olZCvDc7GjbT-GpyX0arD2sP2xY9rwCVlZeJUcKVOsKWUaAu5HEALw_wcB

Will see if this works better. If not, I can always send it back, I suppose. 

I am willing to go an extra mile because Pentax-l 43/1.9 special is, well, very special. I love the sharpness and the rendering. 

 

Edited by Fontan
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Fontan said:

Well - I tried to cover it up and so on, but it is just hit and miss, so I ordered another one adapter from K&F.

https://www.kentfaith.com/KF06.277_m39-50mm-75mm-lenses-to-leica-m-camera-mount-adapter?gclid=Cj0KCQjw3ZX4BRDmARIsAFYh7ZLpDjHdl6olZCvDc7GjbT-GpyX0arD2sP2xY9rwCVlZeJUcKVOsKWUaAu5HEALw_wcB

Will see if this works better. If not, I can always send it back, I suppose. 

I am willing to go an extra mile because Pentax-l 43/1.9 special is, well, very special. I love the sharpness and the rendering. 

 

 

It still has the cutout. You need adapters like this:

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Fontan said:

Thank you for the info!

You’re welcome. There are other adapters available without the cutout if you dig around. I have a couple old Voigtlander adapters without the cutout. They are no longer made and Rayqual is the new choice that the Voigtlander rep, Cameraquest, sells. Send an email to Steve Gandy, the owner..

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, lucerne said:

Tom

What evidence do you have for such a statement.  have you handled both.   What quality deficiencies did you observe.
Dont be fooled.  There may be some poorly made products but the kipon is fully profiled and well finished.   Its not the cheapest and it does what its supposed to do.   The Rayqual is very overpriced.   
What do get for the extra cost?   Nothing!   Its a single pressing.  Once its fitted to the lens youll not  need to touch it again.

Good point - KIPON is a reputable manufacturer, and the products are generally good quality. The KIPON ltm/M adapter I have does have an appropriate cutout to work with most lenses, and covers the 6-bit sensor with an area with machined pits for encoding. The adapter is satin-chrome plated without grinding off the plating on the rear seating surface as was done on the original Leitz adapters (to assure plating thickness did not affect the registration distance). The satin-chrome has a definite texture, and I notice it has scuff marks on the back after some use of mounting-removing. Leitz used bright chrome with a smooth finish.

The genuine Leitz adapters I have all measure flange thickness of 0.98 to 0.99 mm measure at points all around the circumference. The only KIPON I have measures from 1.02 to 1.07 mm measured around the circumference - so about 0.05 mm variation on the same part. I suspect that may be variation in plating thickness causing it.

The Rayqual adapters I have also have a similar partial cutout to work with most lenses, and cover the 6-bit sensor with a machined channel (instead of individual pits) in area needed for coding with paint. These also have a satin chrome finish (black on these), but seem to have less texture than the KIPON, and also do not grind it off on the back side of the flange. The two Rayqual adapters I have measure flange thickness of 0.97 to 0.98 mm all around the circumference, so consistency is on the same order as the Leitz adapters.

Voigtlander were the most like Leitz that I have seen.

I would count both KIPON and Rayqual as good choices compared to other brands of Chinese adapters that I have tried - some don't even have the 3 small cutouts to remove the flange if it gets stuck in the camera body. But as I suggested, I think Rayqual has a slight edge - based on the few samples I have.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, jdlaing said:

You’re welcome. There are other adapters available without the cutout if you dig around. I have a couple old Voigtlander adapters without the cutout. They are no longer made and Rayqual is the new choice that the Voigtlander rep, Cameraquest, sells. Send an email to Steve Gandy, the owner..

Ordered it yesterday!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 7/23/2020 at 5:29 AM, Fontan said:

An update!

Got the Rayqual filter in the mail today, and glad to report that the problem is solved!

Thank you guys!

Is the adapter coded or do you need to write the codes yourself?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 7/24/2020 at 4:16 AM, mmx_2 said:

Is the adapter coded or do you need to write the codes yourself?

 

It’s not coded. But it can be coded is my understanding. The lens I’m slapping on is Pentax-l 43/1.9 m39 screw mount so coding doesn’t matter . . . . 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...