kalifornier Posted June 29, 2020 Share #1 Posted June 29, 2020 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hello All, I'm trying to decide whether to go the Leica-R 60/2.8 or the Sigma 70/2.8 route for macro on my TL2. If you have used either/both, I'd greatly appreciate your thoughts on pros/cons/handling. Thanks., Abhi Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted June 29, 2020 Posted June 29, 2020 Hi kalifornier, Take a look here Leica 60/2.8 R vs Sigma 70/2.8 for macro. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
ramarren Posted June 29, 2020 Share #2 Posted June 29, 2020 Since I've never worked with the Sigma lens, I cannot say what its rendering qualities or performance might be compared to the Macro-Elmarit-R 60mm f/2.8. I've worked with the latter lens extensively and it is a very high quality performer in every way. The Sigma might be as well. Leica also makes the TL60mm f/2.8 macro lens, which performs beautifully as well, but I chose to stick with my ME60R instead of buying one of those because I like the facts that I can use the ME60R on my Leica reflex cameras as well as my M cameras, and with my other cameras as well (because it is simple, manually focus, internally controlled aperture lens) The ME60R has a clearly marked focusing ring with lots of information on it. I have no particular desire or need for automatic focusing and most other automatic exposure modes other than Aperture priority AE. . The Macro-Elmarit-R 60mm lens has been and remains one of my most used lenses with Leicaflex SL, Leica R6.2, Leica CL, and Hasselblad 907x cameras, as well as others that that I no longer own or use. G 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnP1 Posted June 30, 2020 Share #3 Posted June 30, 2020 I have owned and used both on my CL. I have now sold the 60/2.8 R. The Sigma is a better lens, has AF and goes to 1:1 natively. The 60/2.8 needs the macro-adapter R to shoot between 1:2 and 1:1. Although the older lens is not in any way bad, the new Sigma is better. The only reason I'd have kept the 60/2.8 is if I still had an R body, but I have sold that too. Hope this helps. John 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kalifornier Posted July 1, 2020 Author Share #4 Posted July 1, 2020 Many thanks for the insights @ramarren and @JohnP1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EUSe Posted July 1, 2020 Share #5 Posted July 1, 2020 (edited) Am 29.6.2020 um 19:49 schrieb kalifornier: Hello All, I'm trying to decide whether to go the Leica-R 60/2.8 or the Sigma 70/2.8 route for macro on my TL2. If you have used either/both, I'd greatly appreciate your thoughts on pros/cons/handling. Thanks., Abhi Have you considered the 60 mm Apo-Macro-Elmarit TL? It is a stellar performer, rhe best in the TL.lens bunch. The price tag might play a role, though. Edited July 1, 2020 by EUSe 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicci78 Posted July 1, 2020 Share #6 Posted July 1, 2020 TL 60 IQ is stellar. But focus by wire, lack of distance and magnification scales, make it difficult to use for precise macro work. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted July 1, 2020 Share #7 Posted July 1, 2020 Advertisement (gone after registration) I don't quite see the point of AF for macro works but i may be missing something. Now given the stellar performance or the R 60/2.8, let alone its affordable price, it is a lens i will never replace most probably. YMMV. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted July 1, 2020 Share #8 Posted July 1, 2020 Not all macro is static; AF is useful for moving insects, etc. There is also the option, which the CL and TL don't have, for semi-automatic focus stacking using AF in conjunction with Post-Focus. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EUSe Posted July 1, 2020 Share #9 Posted July 1, 2020 vor 1 Stunde schrieb nicci78: TL 60 IQ is stellar. But focus by wire, lack of distance and magnification scales, make it difficult to use for precise macro work. Using the EVF and magnification I don‘t see what the scales would be good for. Then there are moving objects like insects, flowers in the wind etc. where autofocus or even AF-C is needed. Apart from that, the Macro-Elmarit-TL is more than a macro lens. It is excellent for landscapes. Last not least its sitze fits the CL and TL nicely. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kalifornier Posted July 1, 2020 Author Share #10 Posted July 1, 2020 9 hours ago, EUSe said: Have you considered the 60 mm Apo-Macro-Elmarit TL? It is a stellar performer, rhe best in the TL.lens bunch. The price tag might play a role, though. I did consider it, but as you pointed out, price did play a role. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.