Jump to content
me.daveobrien@gmail.com

How would the Zeiss Biogon 25 or 28mm 2.8 perform on the CL?

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hey all,  was curious about how the technical aspects of the Zeiss Biogon lenses ( 25mm or 28mm ) would match up with the CL + adapter. Im between either of those or the TL 23mm Summicron. Main use cases being travel and street photography.

The image render from the Zeiss seems almost better than the 23mm but worried that it wont perform as well on the CL vs a dedicated lens. 

Has anyone used both on a CL or T? 

Thanks in advance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why should it perform less on the CL? The camera is not aware of the brand of the lens. These are simply excellent lenses on any camera. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jaapv said:

Why should it perform less on the CL? The camera is not aware of the brand of the lens. These are simply excellent lenses on any camera. 

 Biogons are typically symmetrical in the optical layout so if true to form have more extreme sensor incidence angles than Distagons , and are more likely to have sensor stack specific  corner color shift or smearing.

I found the TL 23 an average lens not stellar, so understand the desire to look further afield.

The 25 and 28mm ZM lenses never looked great on paper ( MTF graphs show quite a resolution fall off across the image before any sensor stack effects  ) so never tried them , but did use the 21/4,5 finding it to resolve well, but had slight edge color shift.

Sold the 21/4,5 hoping to soon get the 21 Leica SEM. 

The Leica 28 Elmarit ASPH and Summicron do work well and can be recommended.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@me.daveobrien@gmail.com I have no experience with the 25mm or 28mm Biogon lenses but can highly recommend the 24mm Elmarit-M ASPH. Easily my favorite lens with the CL.

@FrozenInTime Very interesting to read about your first-hand experience with the 21mm Biogon. I was considering this lens as well for the CL. Can you confirm that your results were obtained with a CL? If so, do you have any pictures available online that were taken with this combination of Leica CL and 21mm Biogon? Thanks a lot.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have ZM 25mm. It performs excellent on M, SL, and C, but I prefer Leica X much more.   I assume that's an indicator of TL 23mm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

10 hours ago, FrozenInTime said:

 Biogons are typically symmetrical in the optical layout so if true to form have more extreme sensor incidence angles than Distagons , and are more likely to have sensor stack specific  corner color shift or smearing.

I found the TL 23 an average lens not stellar, so understand the desire to look further afield.

The 25 and 28mm ZM lenses never looked great on paper ( MTF graphs show quite a resolution fall off across the image before any sensor stack effects  ) so never tried them , but did use the 21/4,5 finding it to resolve well, but had slight edge color shift.

Sold the 21/4,5 hoping to soon get the 21 Leica SEM. 

The Leica 28 Elmarit ASPH and Summicron do work well and can be recommended.

The original question was not the quality of these lenses as such, but whether it would be advantageous to use them on the CL. The short answer is: yes.
The CL is an APS-C camera, reducing any corner or edge falloff. The CL has been optimized for high-incidence angle lenses to accommodate older M lenses, which would further improve quality towards the corners by lack of sensor stack problems.
So,  if anything, the CL should  bring out the best in these lenses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I looked at the 2.8 25mm Biogon, but ultimately wasnt a faster lens, so I got the 23 Summicron. I haven't looked back. But if you are looking check out the 21mm fast CV lenses too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
vor 19 Stunden schrieb FrozenInTime:

 ...

Sold the 21/4,5 hoping to soon get the 21 Leica SEM.

I own the SEM 21 since several years, but for me, and the CL it's a bit too much on the heavy side.
Think about exchanging it with the new Skopar 3.5/21 VM, a great lens too!

Edited by cp995

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use the Biogon 25mm and the Summicron 23mm on my CL. Here are two quick test shots.

Summicron 23mm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Joachim_I said:

 

@FrozenInTime Very interesting to read about your first-hand experience with the 21mm Biogon. I was considering this lens as well for the CL. Can you confirm that your results were obtained with a CL? If so, do you have any pictures available online that were taken with this combination of Leica CL and 21mm Biogon? Thanks a lot.

 

At the time I only had a TL2. Sorry, I can’t see the images on my active drives, so must be hidden away on the card backups.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, cp995 said:

I own the SEM 21 since several years, but for me, and the CL it's a bit too much on the heavy side.
Think about exchanging it with the new Skopar 3.5/21 VM, a great lens too!

The Voigtländer 40/1.2 is my all time favorite lens, but I just can’t get close enough to buy the 21/3.5 due to the styling of their classic 21, 35 and 50mm lenses.

Edited by FrozenInTime

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
vor 29 Minuten schrieb ruskkyle:

This Biogon looks sharper to my eyes (admittedly on a phone) ... is that what you see?

Yes, the Biogon is sharper than the Summicron.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, ralf3 said:

Yes, the Biogon is sharper than the Summicron.

I do think the so-so performance of the 23 Summicron coupled with it’s high dollar price, is one of things that has held back the APS-C system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gee guys, I’m less sure about the criticism of the 23mm: I used in a library setting for shooting documents informally, handheld, stopped down to 5.6 or 8, and had no complaints at all. Much better than the (compressed) newspaper shots above. 

I don't think its it’s as good as 21 SEM, but few lenses are. My 21 Skopar drops sharpness on the sides, but this may not be a factor on CL. 

Edited by geoffreyg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s not a bad lens, I used it exclusively for a year before adding the 35. In good light it can produce pretty nice images. Just doesn’t have much magic to it in many scenarios.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the initial post, unless you already have M-lenses, why would you buy an M-L adapter (I highly recommend the $450 Leica adapter and not knock-offs) just to use an M-lens?  I, personally, would want to leverage the AF capabilities of the CL and since the Leica TL lenses are really good, I purchased the 23mm, 35mm, and 60mm TL lenses. 

Also, I  have both the 35mm TL (highly acclaimed) and 23mm TL and the 23mm TL is not far from the quality level of the 35mm TL, IMHO.  I wouldn't diss the 23mm TL so quickly unless you've used it in real life situations.  The absolute sharpness I lose with the 23mm TL, I gain with it's compactness; the 35mm TL is pretty obtrusive.  See below compressed pic attesting to the sharpness of the 23; although it's at f5.6.

No post processing outside of saving as compressed JPEG.

Cheers!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Jose_Salcedo
      The optical and mechanical elements of the lens are in excellent condition, with clear glass and perfectly smooth focusing. The retractable sunshade has some minor damage but that does not interfere with the optical or mechanical operation of the lens, that work superbly.
      The sale also includes an original Leica R-M Adapter ROM, #14642, in new condition, as well as a 60mm Leica Uva filter to use with the lens.
      This lens has an exceptional optical resolution and color rendition.
       
    • By RF’sDelight
      Hi, does somebody own a Leica Summicron-M 1:2/28 Edition "Safari" or has seen real life pictures? I’d love to see additional pictures of the lens except the one official photography that’s spread all over the web. 

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By TheGodParticle/Hari
      Most of us seem to be photographers as well as collectors.
      Show me your favorite lenses, old and new alike.
      I like the Noctilux range for the extreme apertures, but I prefer the Summilux range for the best speed:size/weight ratio.
      Here’s a Summilux gathering of 21, 24, 28, 35, 50 and 75mm. All in black. 

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By AeroMirage
      Leica 23mm f2 Summicron-TL ASPH Lens with Case, #4265480, is in excellent cosmetic condition. It has minor paint wear on the bayonet where the hood mounts. I rate it at 9+. 
      The glass is clean and clear with no haze, fungus, or marks. No internal dust. Mechanically, this lens is in proper working order. The aperture blades function properly and are free of oil. The focus ring turns smoothly. This lens comes with original soft case, hood, filter, front and rear caps. This Leica 23mm f2 Summicron-TL is ready to roll! Serial number is clear, so it can be registered with Leica. Genuine Leica E52 UV filter included. (Not shown) Email your location and we can work out shipping.
    • By nicci78
      After lots of discussion about future of APS-C. How many of you think that the real reason for CL/TL being held back is the lack of native lenses ? 
       
      A little history :
      - 2014 : T was released with two lenses : 18-56mm f/3.5-5.6 & 23mm f/2.0
      - 2015 : Then two more with 11-23mm f/3.5-4.5 & 55-135mm f/3.5-4.5
      - 2016 : Leica release the only two made in Germany TL lenses : 35mm f/1.4 & macro 60mm f/2.8
      - 2017 : CL was released with 18mm f/2.8 pancake lens  
      Leica were on a good track, 1 or 2 TL lenses per year. But after 2017 ? Nothing happened at all ! 
      We should have 10 to 14 lenses by now. Not 7. 
       
      Only 1 fast lens. Only a trinity of slow zoom lenses. Only 2 compact prime lenses.
      None of them have OIS. None of the bodies have IBIS. 
      No portrait lens, aka equivalent to fast 85/90mm or 70-200mm f/2.8. 
      No fast wide angle. ex : equivalent to fast 18/21mm. 
      These lens cannot be replaced with any adapted M and R lenses. 
       
      So what’s the problem here ? Leica may think that APS-C line do not sell well enough. So they stop releasing new lenses  ? It is a kind a vicious cercle. But  no new lens = death of the system. 
      Just like they left the S line died by releasing only bare minimum body upgrade and no new lenses for half a decade. 
       
      So what do you think about this situation ? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue., Read more about our Privacy Policy