Jump to content

CL telephoto options


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Having a recently-orphaned Canon 300mm f/4 IS USM in the dry cabinet, I decided to try to adapt it to my CL.  The EOS-LM adapter arrived yesterday, bridging the lens (and 1.4X EF Extender) to the M-Adapter-L (so as to retain use of the dial for magnification); and the rain let up this morning long enough for me to put it to some known targets and a couple of unknown critters.  

I expected it to be optically a notch or two below the Nikon 300PF+1.4X, which I used on the CL in the past.  But to my surprise, it's very much on par in terms of acuity, and actually better on backlit and underlit subjects.  And where the 300PF was a bit too light for inertia to aid stabilization, the Canon 300mm lens hits the sweet spot for being just heavy enough (1190g) to be fairly stable for hand-held shooting on the CL, without making the setup front-heavy.

AOV is roughly 630mm on the CL, with the added benefit of having a ~450mm AOV at f/4 available if the speed is needed.  Attached is a shot of a Pacific Swallow in dim overcast lighting (literally seconds before the rain started again) with the CL/300mm f/4 IS USM/EF Extender 1.4X/EOS-LM adapter/M-Adapter-L:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by tritentrue
Grammar correction
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, tritentrue said:

Having a recently-orphaned Canon 300mm f/4 IS USM in the dry cabinet, I decided to try to adapt it to my CL.  The EOS-LM adapter arrived yesterday, bridging the lens (and 1.4X EF Extender) to the M-Adapter-L (so as to retain use of the dial for magnification); and the rain let up this morning long enough for me to put it to some known targets and a couple of unknown critters.  

I expected it to be optically a notch or two below the Nikon 300PF+1.4X, which I used on the CL in the past.  But to my surprise, it's very much on par in terms of acuity, and actually better on backlit and underlit subjects.  And where the 300PF was a bit too light for inertia to aid stabilization, the Canon 300mm lens hits the sweet spot for being just heavy enough (1190g) to be fairly stable for hand-held shooting on the CL, without making the setup front-heavy.

AOV is roughly 630mm on the CL, with the added benefit of having a ~450mm AOV at f/4 available if the speed is needed.  Attached is a shot of a Pacific Swallow in dim overcast lighting (literally seconds before the rain started again) with the CL/300mm f/4 IS USM/EF Extender 1.4X/EOS-LM adapter/M-Adapter-L:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

That`s a lovely shot .Which make of adapter did you decide to go for  ?

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...