Jump to content

Zeiss 35mm 1.4 Distagon user experience


Ertos

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Back when I was deciding on what 35mm lens to buy, I looked for user experiences with the Zeiss 35mm 1.4 Distagon but couldn't find that many. There are a few posts on the forum but there isn't all that much out there. Now that I own this lens and have used it for a while, I thought it makes sense to write a short blog post about it: https://www.erwinhartenbergphoto.com/post/a-new-point-of-view-the-zeiss-distagon-35mm-f1-4-zm 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree absolutely about those lens caps – cheap screw-in filter is the best answer. Used mine without the optional hood but, ultimately, gave up on the lens because of its weight on an M camera. Tempted now to try another as the new VC v3 seems to be not quite as wonderful as I had hoped for, from what others say.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

For years, the Nikon 35mm f/1.4 was my favorite lens and my favorite focal length on my Nikon SLR film camera.

When I finally purchased my Leica M6 rangefinder, I knew that I wanted a 35mm f/1.4 for my first lens. I considered the Leica, Voitlander, and Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 lenses. I selected the Zeiss for the following reasons:

1. I had never used Leica or Voitlander lenses but was familiar with Zeiss lenses because I used two (28mm f/2 and 135mm f/2) on my Nikon SLR, I used four (21mm f/2.8, 28mm f/2.8, 45mm f/2, and 90mm f/2.8) on my Contax rangefinder, and I used one (12mm f/2..8) on my Fuji mirrorless digital.

2. Reviews of the 35mm f/1.4 Zeiss lens were very favorable.

3. The price of my 35mm f/1.4 Zeiss lens was half the price of the Leica.

Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 on M6 by Narsuitus, on Flickr

 

Edited by Narsuitus
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Narsuitus said:

 

1. I had never used Leica or Voitlander lenses but was familiar with Zeiss lenses because I used two (28mm f/2 and 135mm f/2

I had the 135 as well on my Nikon Df (and the 100 f2) - Fantastic lenses.....

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Thanks for your impressions.

I bought the Distagon a couple of weeks ago and I am really impressed of its quality with the M10. Many reviewers think, that it is one of the best 35mm lenses and I think they are absolutely right (https://sites.google.com/site/wosimsphotography/leica-camera-lens-reviews/links-testberichte-reviews/testberichte-objektive-leica-lens-reviews-28mm-35mm here are the reviews I found so far).

Only negative points: It is big and you have to buy the hood separately.

Best regards!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi, this could be a generic query for any lens really. I have the lens cap of this lens and don't want to put a hood. Is putting a filter generally enough for carrying around? I am careful with my camera anyway and mostly carry in a bag.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mahesh said:

Hi, this could be a generic query for any lens really. I have the lens cap of this lens and don't want to put a hood. Is putting a filter generally enough for carrying around? I am careful with my camera anyway and mostly carry in a bag.

I don't care for large hoods.  For my 50 'cron, I use a filter and step up rings as a hood.  That is, a 39mm filter, a 39-43mm ring, and a 43-46mm ring.  They also protect the lens (and filter) from frontal bumps.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Danner said:

I don't care for large hoods.  For my 50 'cron, I use a filter and step up rings as a hood.  That is, a 39mm filter, a 39-43mm ring, and a 43-46mm ring.  They also protect the lens (and filter) from frontal bumps.

How did I forget this? I have done this in the past for another camera system and is a nifty trick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, the Distagon is the best of my 5 Mount lenses.

(My other 4 :

-Leica Summarit 2,5/35

-LEITZ Summicron 2/35 v4

-ZEISS Biogon 2/35

-VOIGTLÄNDER Nokton 1,2/35 v1.)

I do not like the fiddly lens cap, when the hood is fitted. I bought a bayonet hood made in China, at a reasonable price.

The review posted by padam showed that the Summilux FLE produces onion ring bokeh balls, so I do not need it, because my Nokton does this already.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 5/24/2021 at 12:59 PM, crony said:

Hi, the Distagon is the best of my 5 Mount lenses.

(My other 4 :

-Leica Summarit 2,5/35

-LEITZ Summicron 2/35 v4

-ZEISS Biogon 2/35

-VOIGTLÄNDER Nokton 1,2/35 v1.)

I do not like the fiddly lens cap, when the hood is fitted. I bought a bayonet hood made in China, at a reasonable price.

The review posted by padam showed that the Summilux FLE produces onion ring bokeh balls, so I do not need it, because my Nokton does this already.

 

 

But which is your favourite?!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, haikos said:

But which is your favourite?!

Hi, I like my dear old Summicron best. I have it since 1988, bought with my M6 then. Maybe, it's a first love kind of thing ...

Next comes the Summarit.

My preferences for small lenses result from my appreciation of compactness, developed over the years. This is a matter of taste, of course.

Strange as it may sound, I like the results of the Distagon, not its bulk and weight ... ---

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...