Jump to content
Mscott842

How many M9s with original sensor

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

9 hours ago, capelini61 said:

Summing up

Sums don't seem to be your strong point. If as you claim you bought the M9 when it came out in 2009 and you changed the sensor 4 years later, that is 2013. The second generation sensor was not installed until end of 2015 so if your timeline is correct you don't have the latest version. So then we move on to, according to you, 4 years later. 2017. (which fyi is 3 years before now). I'm not sure but I think in 2017 the free exchange program was still running.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, ianman said:

A soma não parece ser o seu ponto forte. Se, como você afirma, comprou o M9 quando saiu em 2009 e mudou o sensor 4 anos depois, ou seja, 2013. O sensor de segunda geração não foi instalado até o final de 2015, portanto, se sua linha do tempo estiver correta, você não terá o última versão. Então passamos a, de acordo com você, 4 anos depois. 2017. (que fyi é de 3 anos antes agora). Não tenho certeza, mas acho que em 2017 o programa de troca gratuita ainda estava em execução.

you are absolutely right about the chronology I am very sorry. They exchanged the sensor of my M9 for the same, this way the problem happened again and I still have a corroded sensor, it is not my fault.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No it's not your fault, of course!  They replaced your sensor with a "bad" one back then because they were still working - with Kodak I guess - to find a solution. It was a temporary solution. When your second sensor developed the same issue you should have sent it back to have the newly developed sensor. It depends when that was, but if as you wrote, it was in 2017 then you would still have got it for free.

As I have written elsewhere, I understand your frustration and I still think that Leica should have provided free replacement parts for much longer. The sensor is the heart of a digital camera and the initial design had a fault. It's not normal wear and tear as another member posted. Mine actually developed the problem in 2012 but of course I had no idea at the time. I'm not blaming Leica for the poor design, these things happen and can happen to any company. I do think they handle the whole thing very badly, especially for a company which prides itself on the quality of it's products and services.

It may be worth your while to write to them explaining your situation... who knows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, ianman said:

No it's not your fault, of course!  They replaced your sensor with a "bad" one back then because they were still working - with Kodak I guess - to find a solution. It was a temporary solution. When your second sensor developed the same issue you should have sent it back to have the newly developed sensor. It depends when that was, but if as you wrote, it was in 2017 then you would still have got it for free.

As I have written elsewhere, I understand your frustration and I still think that Leica should have provided free replacement parts for much longer. The sensor is the heart of a digital camera and the initial design had a fault. It's not normal wear and tear as another member posted. Mine actually developed the problem in 2012 but of course I had no idea at the time. I'm not blaming Leica for the poor design, these things happen and can happen to any company. I do think they handle the whole thing very badly, especially for a company which prides itself on the quality of it's products and services.

It may be worth your while to write to them explaining your situation... who knows.

Agree. Free sensor replacements for corroded sensors lasted AFAIK until Leica’s policy beginning 2018...

https://en.leica-camera.com/World-of-Leica/Leica-News/Global/2018/CCD-sensors-of-the-Leica-M9-M9-P-M-Monochrom-and-M-E-camera-models

I thought Leica should have done more, especially for folks who already had suffered through earlier replacements.  But it was also incumbent upon the owners to communicate on a timely and professional basis with Leica.  The kind of rant we’ve seen here (on 10 separate threads) is unlikely to translate to any favors from Leica, even if the solution should have been formalized, not requiring favors.  A little bit of honey....

Jeff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue., Read more about our Privacy Policy