Jump to content

M10, M240, M262 or stay with Leica CL

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi all! 


Apologies in advance for the length of this post! 


I was wondering if you all are able to give me some advice or words of wisdom on whether I should get a Rangefinder Leica. 


At the moment I’m currently using and enjoying my Leica CL & 23mm f2 Summicron. Purchased in Oct 2018. I absolutely love shooting with the CL and for me it was the upgrade I was always wanting. I even adapt some rare and unique vintage m42 lenses to it and get some amazing results. 


Now I’m no professional photographer, just a hobby shooter but the Leica CL I have had really developed my love and passion for photography. At the time of purchasing the CL I was using a Nikon D7500 which I still have (but never use) so for me, at the time the CL was the next step up, and I never thought of going for a rangefinder (couldn’t afford the m10 and lenses anyway lol). 


But now having visited the Sydney Leica store on many occasions to try out the M10 and the rangefinder systems, I’ve grown more interest for a Rangefinder. 


I’m interested in the M240, maybe the M262. I like the appeal of a brassing body though (a bit of individualism I’d say). But honestly I’m not sure which system to go for (and I don’t have the money for a new M10). 


What are the PROS and CONS for each system? What makes you want to stay with that system? (if you have one) what would you recommend I do or go for? 


Now I’ve done heaps of research and reviews on both systems but I really want to hear from everyday people who use them. 



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait six months and the market will be awash with used M10s once the M10-R ( with the 40Mpixel M10M sensor } arrives on the market .

The refined handling and the thinner M10 body, same feel as film M, is worth it. Many M9 users skipped the M.240 and M.262.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you do not have M-lenses already, I would stay with the CL. Otherwise you could have a look at the Leica SL (nice priced in the used market). The rangefinder technology has some disadvantages.

Edited by jankap

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


The rangefinder is my preferred camera because of the experience of seeing with the M viewfinder coupled (no pun intended) with rangefinder focusing. The latter takes some practice but is fun and easy enough to develop speed and accuracy in focusing. I have used and will continue to use other cameras (X Vario) that have the LCD or  EVF but for me it is not the same experience. I seem to draw an inspiration from the "seeing" experience that the M offers. 

The CL from what I have seen and system is really more than adequate so I agree that you are best to stay put with that unless you want to invest further.  I was recently  impressed playing with the SL2 and it's finder but the whole camera is unwieldy-large for me. I see Leica in large part (going back to early Leicas I had) about compactness. The new CL builds on that in a way that the other cameras do not.

Leica M262 cameras can be had for $2800-3300 lightly used and you're off! ...to buy more glass ;)


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By bgb
      I purchased a Q end of last year, liked it so much that I sold my Nikon DSLR, Lumix FZ-2500 and Fuji XE-T3. I then purchased the CL with the 18-56mm lens a few months later. Now with adapters to use my Rokinon wide-angles, and 7 Artisan lenses I find myself using the Leica CL way more than the Q.  There's no doubt that the IQ of photos from the Q, a full-frame camera, are better than the Leica CL, t's a fantastic camera and lens with macro capability.. But I'm thinking of selling it add more lenses for the CL (or at least pay it off 😎).   Anyone else face this situation?    BTW, with all that's going on in the world at this time, I'm fully aware that this is no big deal, but it keeps my mind off the other cataclysmic issues  we're experiencing.  All opinions welcome, any recommendation for lenses?...thanks.  I am currently waiting for arrival of the TTArtisan 35mm F1.4 lens to ship.  Be Well everyone.
    • By UltraDan
      So I just picked up an M240 and wanted to ask current users - how do people shoot these to get the best results ? Do you under or overexpose the files? I'm using uncompressed DNG is it noticeable over the compressed files? 
      Thanks for any info. 

    • By twcxz
      Hi everyone, 
      I'm currently working on a project to once and for all fix the analogue Leica CL's broken take up spool problem, by 3D printing them. 
      I've ran a roll through mine with version 2 of the spool and it works pretty good, but i'm working on version 3 which should be better still - I got the dimensions slightly wrong on this one - it's too short.
      How many of you CL owners would be interested in buying such an item? They'd cost around £20 and be sold through eBay all said and done, and I'd make a video showing how to take apart the CL and install them, as well as reassembly - International shipping would happen too through the eBay GSP as I'm UK based.
      The attached photo is version 2 and not by any means the final version as this is still in very early development, but the quality of the ones that go on sale will be much higher. This one was printed by a friend of mine, but I'm soon going to acquire my own printer and make them much better.
      I know also that this doesn't look anything like the original, but when I copied the original part dimension for dimension, curve by curve, it didn't work and suffered the same problems as the original.. immediately. Thus I simplified it and made it more "3D Printer friendly."

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By Holger1
      RESERVIERT   Verkaufe aus Sammlung eine Leica M 10 silber. Die silberne Version ist vom Werk her ausverkauft. Die Kamera ist sehr wenig benutzt worden und hat zwei minimale Gebrauchsspuren. Das Display und der Sucher sind frei von Kratzern. Der original Leica-Akku ist dabei, die Kameraschatulle, sowie ein unbenutzter Tragegurt, ein Ladegerät, Anleitung und mehrere Kabel. Mit dabei ist das 224 Seiten starke Buch "Leica M10" von Michel Birnbacher. PDF als Leseprobe: https://www.franzis.de/media/pdf/3c/b0/d5/60648-6_LP_Kamerabuch-Leica-M10.pdf?sPartner=1134 Dies ist ein Privatverkauf- I send only within EU.     FOTOS-- weiter unten! bitte runterscollen  


    • By UltraDan
      I have posted this on the M240 forum but thought I'd ask the same question here as well as it's relevant to this forum :
      Question to those that have used or have both of the above cameras - is there much IQ difference between the two? I'm guessing that the M10 just has slightly better ISO performance? 
      looking at both of these and struggling to find a reason to pay the extra for the M10 other than it's the latest and greatest. 
  • Create New...