Jump to content
Landiah

Experience with 50 APO on film?

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Does anyone here have experience with this combo? I have a 50 summicron v5 but am tempted by the pull of the APO. I primarily shoot film, will i see any difference?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have both. The 50APO is marvellous and definitely better then the  Summicron v5. But you can only see it with the Monochrom-M. In my opinion the 50APO is for film not necessary. If you want to buy a Monochrom (1, 2 or 3rd Version) the Apo will be your choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the lens, and I am using it with Leica M-A. I can say honestly that I would choose 50’lux if I were not seeking for the edge-to-edge sharpness. The difference is quite small between those 50’crons in terms of technical aspect. Yet the character of 50’APO is considerably unique. As result, no need to splurge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess no APO for me.  😔

Odeon, I have seen some of your photos with the 50 APO and M-A and that is actually one of the things that inspired by desire for the combo. If there really is no noticeable difference perhaps I will go for the lux. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

9 minutes ago, Landiah said:

I guess no APO for me.  😔

Odeon, I have seen some of your photos with the 50 APO and M-A and that is actually one of the things that inspired by desire for the combo. If there really is no noticeable difference perhaps I will go for the lux. 

I had 50'lux, and I sold it before I got 50'APO. I was to expect that the 50'APO made my photos more distinctive. But the opposite is truth...

50'APO offers impressive micro-contrast, cutting-edge technology on paper, and background isolation from the subject. I never argue the quality of 50'APO. On the other hand, 50'lux has more distinctive character, lesser sharpness, more overall contrast, and one extra stop... The last one, the extra stop, would be life saving while using film. I have to say that one will be surely more pleased with 50'lux if she or he captures only film.

You are probably about to ask me why I am still using 50'APO... The answer is that I would like to see the horizon while shooting in Adox CMS II, Cinestill 50D, or something else which offers great resolving power. No need to use 50'APO if you desire to choose Tri-X, HP5+, an so on. Another reason for me would be emotional engagement to 50'APO.

Leica M240 + 50'lux

Leica M-A + Adox CMS 20 II + 50'APO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have used the 50 APO with my M7 using Pan F+ and Acros 100.

I get drum scans done for prints to 30”x20”.

I think I can see the benefit of the APO for edge to edge sharpness at all apertures, and the benefit of its very flat field which is good for landscapes when i compare it to my 50 v5 .....the HUGE CAVEAT here is that my v5 was potentially a very poor copy, given it had a lot of veiling flare (low contrast in middle of image in many lighting scenes) and it had an enormous field curvature (for a landscape .... the middle of the image at infinity was sharp; the edges at infinity were completely blurred; and the edges just a metre away were razor sharp!).

Does anyone else’s v5 do that?

Hence I found the APO more “reliable” for many subjects due to knowing that it has a flat field for landscapes, and it’s tack sharp at any aperture. It also has very high acuity.

Again - it could be that my v5 was just a terrible copy, and this exacerbated the difference I see.

Regardless, from a purely tactile experience, the APO is among the nicest handling lenses I’ve ever used ....solid, dense, precise, lovely weighting to the focus ring, lovely lens hood.

It might not be relevant to you, but it’s also very “future proof” for the much higher megapixel cameras now coming out of Leica (M10 Monochrom; SL2; ....), and there I think one does more readily see a larger difference, not just resolution but also less purple fringing etc.

So the APO is technically pretty perfect within the M range. Whether it makes more “beautiful” images is a separate question to consider though!

 

Edited by Jon Warwick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shiva is dead wrong.

@benqui and @Ernest use the 50APO extensively with film and the characteristics of the lens definitely come through.  

Everything that the 50 APO is vs the other 50mm Leica lens comes through on film.

Whether it makes sense to pay full price for a 50mm to just use it on film is entirely subjective. 

I would not.  But you are not me.  If you have the budget and/or can get a great deal on one (which is the case for one of my friends) and can visualize how you would use it to up your game and achieve certain results, I could be persuaded that you are not crazy.

I am sure that Marc and Rog would be happy to provide some examples here if you would like - although be ready to be persuaded!  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, A miller said:

Shiva is dead wrong.

@benqui and @Ernest use the 50APO extensively with film and the characteristics of the lens definitely come through.  

Everything that the 50 APO is vs the other 50mm Leica lens comes through on film.

Whether it makes sense to pay full price for a 50mm to just use it on film is entirely subjective. 

I would not.  But you are not me.  If you have the budget and/or can get a great deal on one (which is the case for one of my friends) and can visualize how you would use it to up your game and achieve certain results, I could be persuaded that you are not crazy.

I am sure that Marc and Rog would be happy to provide some examples here if you would like - although be ready to be persuaded!  

I would love to see some examples, I hope they would be kind enough to share some examples. I’ve already seemed to persuade myself. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Landiah said:

I would love to see some examples

+1

After adding a film Leica to my bag, I've lost interest in premium glass. B&W films I use offer (my rough estimate) an equivalent of maybe 12MP resolution, some even less, and zone focusing requires me to shoot at f/5.6 or smaller, so out-of-focus areas look very similar across all lenses. My $400 Voightlander is absolutely kicking ass and I doubt if even a Summarit is worth it's price on film, thinking about sticking to Voightlander lenses for my film photography.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue., Read more about our Privacy Policy