Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hello,

I am renting an M10 this week to try it out and see if it works for me. I have an M6 (.58) and  Q.

I tend to shoot on the wider end (35, 28,  or even 24).  Sadly I sold my 21 Elmarit years ago. Loved that lens.

It hadn't occurred to me that the .73 finder on the M10 might be a concern.  I might look into a good M9 or maybe a 242 or 262 if the .73 is not working for me.  Or I might just get a 50 and see things a different way.

 

I'm curious if any wide angle M10 shooters have opinions on this.

 

Thanks,
Mike

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use my M10 and Ultron 21mm all the time. One of my favorite combinations. I don't have years of habit using the OVF to overcome, so just switching to using the back displays for composition and focusing works well for me. I suppose the Visioflex would be an option too, I've heard decent things about the M10 Visio (typ 020).

 

Most the the images in my Shanghai album (link!) were taking with that combination using the back to focus / compose.

 

fullJPG-20190710-M_106865 by Brandon Harris, on Flickr

 

fullJPG-20190707-M_106370 by Brandon Harris, on Flickr

 

fullJPG-20190710-M_106814 by Brandon Harris, on Flickr

 

fullJPG-20190708-M_106558 by Brandon Harris, on Flickr

  • Like 8
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

the .73 finder can be a problem if you are a wide angle shooter, I too prefer wide lenses on an M and although I do have a 75mm VC 2.8 lens I rarely if ever go above 50mm. I've wished for a long time that Leica would offer a .58 finder on their digital M's even as an "Ala Carte" option, but I really don't believe that's ever going to happen and that's a shame. That .58 finder was ideal for WA users. As it is the .73 finder on the M10's is ok, but many users like myself find it impossible to see even the corners of the 28mm frame lines.

I am also not a big fan of the Visoflex 020 EVF, even though I own one, what I do use though is the Leica clip-on 21-24-28mm OVF and I find that it suits my needs extremely well, so I would recommend that you check that out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on if you want to use an external viewfinder. I think your best option would be the EVF, if you can stand the screen quality. 
I hate using external viewfinders, when I use my 21mm elmarit, I just imagine what’s on the edges :) and if I need more exact framing I use live view. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Thanks for all of the replies. I will check out the recommendations made. I am not thrilled with the idea of an EVF - I have my Q for that. Part of why I want the M10 is so I can use the excellent M rangefinder system to compose and focus.

Just spent a few hours outside with the M10/35mm F/2 and my glasses. It wasn't as difficult as I was concerned it might be.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, nameBrandon said:

I use my M10 and Ultron 21mm all the time. One of my favorite combinations. I don't have years of habit using the OVF to overcome, so just switching to using the back displays for composition and focusing works well for me. I suppose the Visioflex would be an option too, I've heard decent things about the M10 Visio (typ 020).

 

Most the the images in my Shanghai album (link!) were taking with that combination using the back to focus / compose.

 

fullJPG-20190710-M_106865 by Brandon Harris, on Flickr

 

fullJPG-20190707-M_106370 by Brandon Harris, on Flickr

 

fullJPG-20190710-M_106814 by Brandon Harris, on Flickr

 

fullJPG-20190708-M_106558 by Brandon Harris, on Flickr

 

Love the look of a 21. Now you have me wanting to get a 21 before I even get the M10.

Thanks
Mike

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

I have enjoyed using my 21, 28 and 35 on my M10. I had my 21 SEM in tow when I visited Granville Island (Vancouver) in Decemebr

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nachtmsk said:

 

Love the look of a 21. Now you have me wanting to get a 21 before I even get the M10.

Thanks
Mike

 

It's hard to go wrong with the CV 21mm at 1/10th the price of the equivalent Summilux. It's a pretty good one too, it's the only non-Leica M-Mount lens I've kept around.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a wide-angle freak - and a happy M10 user.  A 20/21 has been the first focal length I've bought in any/every camera system since 1978.

But I am also now (since 1999) in love with external window finders. "I don' need no stinkin' EVF" to use wides/superwides.

Using up a Voigtlander Bessa-L (no internal RF/VF at all) with their first 15mm twenty-one years ago was so - liberating. Everything is going to be in the picture and everything is going to be sharp - so let it all count. Rather like a better-quality Diana, Holga, or Lomo. See it, snap it. ;)

https://www.cameraquest.com/voigtbl.htm

Both this and another thread have reminded me just how liberating (and actually - life-changing) that was. Since it was what led me eventually to Leica M - same view, but a bit more variety than "15mm" all the time.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I often use a Zeiss Distagon 4/18 with the M10-D. I got an EVF 020, but I don't use it and the M10-D has no display - after a short while you get e feeling for the "frame", no problem at all. I simply cut my virtual slice out of the landscape and I am satisfied with the results.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I love using my Super Elmar 18mm on my M10 with the VisioFlex. Here are a few samples.

Regards,
Bud James

Please check out my fine art and travel photography at www.budjames.photography or on Instagram at www.instagram.com/budjamesphoto.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here another shot with my M10 and Super Elmar 18.

Regards,
Bud James

Please check out my fine art and travel photography at www.budjames.photography or on Instagram at www.instagram.com/budjamesphoto.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 1/31/2020 at 3:47 PM, Nachtmsk said:

 

Love the look of a 21. Now you have me wanting to get a 21 before I even get the M10.

Thanks
Mike

 

I find anything wider than 28 is a bit of a waste on the rangefinder system. Because of the close focus limitations you can never really put a subject close enough to the camera to really emphasize it. 90% of the time I either crop in or have too much foreground on my 21mm shots. 
 

Honestly, the only thing that keeps me in the 21 game is how AMAZING the IQ is from the 21sem. It’s one of the best lenses I have ever used. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Not the M10, but the M9. I use the Zeiss 21mm f2.8 on the M9 with the 21mm VF, and it works really well. If I had the M10, I'd definitely use liveview to focus and compose, it would be even easier.

M9 + ZM21/2.8 - Ueno by Archiver, on Flickr

M9 - Imperial Hotel Osaka by Archiver, on Flickr

M9 - Chi Lin Nunnery by Archiver, on Flickr

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...