Jump to content

Delta 400 in Rodinal - Dev Time?


Keith (M)

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Delta 400 in Rodinal - dev times? I was given a roll of 35mm Delta 400, a film I have never used before (for ISO 400 I generally use Tri-X). MassiveDev app for Delta & Rodinal 1:50 states 20mins - which seems a rather long time to me. Anyone any experience of processing Delta 400 in Rodinal?

PS - am not in a position to use anything other than Rodinal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My 20-year-old Ilford Data Guide says 18 minutes for Delta 400 at ISO 400 in Rodinal 1:50 - but Rodinal has probably been slightly reformulated since then, in transitioning from Agfa (RIP) to Adox. If Ilford today thinks 20 minutes is better, I'd go with that.

Anyway - yes, at 1:50 dilution there is darn little developer actually in the can - it will take longer to produce a given silver density (TANSTAAFL). Rodinal was originally designed (a century ago or more) for the 1:25 dilution as standard - but many photographers decided that they preferred the longer tonal range (compensated development) of 1:50 or even 1:100, so those have become a "standard" of their own. They work - they just take longer.

Always remember that Delta 400 (like TMax 400) has significantly different physical chemistry of the pre-exposed silver crystals compared to Tri-X. So while the ISO is the same, don't assume the development times will be similar.

In exchange for generally-finer grain, TMax and Delta take longer to develop and to fix - the pancake crystals are just not as responsive to the chemistry. And are much "pickier" about precise development - timing, dilution, temperature. Although my experience is that Delta is sort of "in between" TMax and Tri-X - not quite as "high-strung" but also not quite as fine-grained. Good tones.

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I use Rodinal a lot with FP4 at 8 minutes for 1:25 and find that 8 to 9 minutes is about the right general time for most 125 iso films.

My bottle of Rodinal says 8 minutes for Delta 400 at 1:25 or 18 minutes at 1:50 so that is what I would use.

My friend uses Delta 400 all the time in Perceptol and gets good results.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Thanks for all the replies, much appreciated!  I searched on Flickr and trawled through lots of images, most of which gave dev details. Of those I looked at, those exposed at ISO 400 and developed for circa 18 to 20mins @ 1:50 had quite coarse grain whereas those given stand-development @1:100 had less obvious grain and were certainly more pleasing to the eye.

This is just a one-off roll that will be interesting to use/develop but then it will be back to using the stack of Tri-X residing in the freezer (alongside my last two rolls of Acros 100!).

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Loaded the Delta 400 in my Leica R5 on Thursday and spent mid-afternoon (dark & gloomy) walking around Avebury. Dev'd the film Fri afternoon using 1:100 Rodinal stand development (1hr with 15secs agitation at the start and mid-way). Resulting negs are like the afternoon - dark, gloomy and gritty. Example below (scanned on V700 using EpsonScan2 & imported into LR CC.  21-35mm Vario Elmar-R.

Places of worship, millennia apart!

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Keith (M)
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...