Jump to content

LEICA M10 to M10-P Upgrade..or ways to dampen M10's shutter


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I have the opportunity of upgrading to the M10-P for $1,500 from the M10. There are no known issues. Is it worth the upgrade? I am sure others say it is ultimately up to me to decide this, but wanted to know if the M10-P shutter alone is worth the upgrade (and I am aware resale value on P models are much, much better). Or, if there is a way to dampen the M10's shutter?

Edited by danieldouloslee
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, danieldouloslee said:

I have the opportunity of upgrading to the M10-P for $1,500 from the M10. There are no known issues. Is it worth the upgrade? I am sure others say it is ultimately up to me to decide this, but wanted to know if the M10-P shutter alone is worth the upgrade (and I am aware resale value on P models are much, much better). Or, if there is a way to dampen the M10's shutter?

If you can get the full upgrade for $1,500 go for it. If you are not aware, there are two upgrades available. Engraved top plate and touch screen is $ 1,300. The full upgrade including the silent shutter is $ 3,000.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

If I loved the M10 I would not be able to resist this offer. I know the sound of the shutter of the M10P and it is almost unbelievable that this sound is still mechanic and not electronic. It is not just the beauty of the sound, but it is very functional in the first place. Especially for theatre photography and in combination with the higher ISO’s in the M10 only natural. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, danieldouloslee said:

I have also dunked it underwater and it seems to have muffled the noise.

Dunking it in molasses muffles the sound even more.  Of course your subject needs to be okay with being dunked in molasses too ...

Pete.

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

$1,500 (!) when you can instead feign a cough as you press the shutter for free? If you are concerned about 'authenticity' and your cough sounding contrived drop me a pm and I'll send you some cold germs. Clearing the throat also works to mask the shutter sound but it can sound disapproving depending on the situation.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have two M10s. After dinging the top plate of one of them, I sent it to Leica for the M1oP conversion. The quote to replace the top plate was $1,000, so I sprung for the conversion. 

My converted M10P was returned about 2 months ago. I love the quiet shutter and electronic level. The sound difference is significant. I thought that the M10 was quiet before shooting with the M10P.

I looked at trading in an M10 for a new M10P,  but the net cost was more expensive than the conversion.

Regards,
Bud James

Please check out my fine art and travel photography at www.budjames.photography or on Instagram at www.instagram.com/budjamesphoto.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, jaapv said:

Why not get one of the Leica models that  offer an electronic shutter? An SL, or CL if you can adapt to the crop (I found it easy) can be completely silent.

They don't offer fast enough sensor read-out speeds. You will get rolling shutter (bent golfclubs, poles, and anything and everything that moves quickly will be deformed). A secondary trait thanks to the slow read-out speed is also the sensitivity to severe banding under artificial light.

The only camera that pulls off the "electronic shutter" is the Sony A9. In most other cameras the use-case for the electronic shutter is very limited, borderline gimmicky.

The A9 is a cracking camera that I wouldn't consider. I'd rather use the M10-P which offers nearly the same effect but without the bad side-effects of an electronic shutter with a slow read-out speed.

Edited by indergaard
Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, indergaard said:

The only camera that pulls off the "electronic shutter" is the Sony A9. In most other cameras the use-case for the electronic shutter is very limited, borderline gimmicky.

I have about 110,000 frames with a pair of Nikon Z6's and one Z7 and I am very much able to use the electronic shutter in a great variety of situations that include people not being still. I'm not having any issues like the above and instead, find the use of it truly revolutionary in discreet and quite genres.

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, indergaard said:

They don't offer fast enough sensor read-out speeds. You will get rolling shutter (bent golfclubs, poles, and anything and everything that moves quickly will be deformed). A secondary trait thanks to the slow read-out speed is also the sensitivity to severe banding under artificial light.

The only camera that pulls off the "electronic shutter" is the Sony A9. In most other cameras the use-case for the electronic shutter is very limited, borderline gimmicky.

The A9 is a cracking camera that I wouldn't consider. I'd rather use the M10-P which offers nearly the same effect but without the bad side-effects of an electronic shutter with a slow read-out speed.

I can only provoke rolling shutter effects on very fast moving objects like airplane propellers, both on the CL and Panasonic GX8. In circumstances where one would need an electronic shutter for silence, like for instance a theater performance or in a church, it is not very likely that there would be  aircraft or formula1 cars at full speed present. A matter of using the feature when needed , not as a permanent setting. Yes. LED light will provoke banding - also on the A9. Fortunately theater lighting is usually incandescent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For as long a mechanical shutter is needed in certain cases a near-silent, vibration-less mechanical shutter that can be used under all circumstances has the huge advantage that it doesn’t need a menu setting, so it cannot be set wrong. Nothing to fiddle with. As simple as possible, but not simpler than that.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 9/16/2019 at 9:38 AM, danieldouloslee said:

I have the opportunity of upgrading to the M10-P for $1,500 from the M10. There are no known issues. Is it worth the upgrade? I am sure others say it is ultimately up to me to decide this, but wanted to know if the M10-P shutter alone is worth the upgrade (and I am aware resale value on P models are much, much better). Or, if there is a way to dampen the M10's shutter?

Short answer - NO, the shutter sound alone is not reason enough for the upgrade. The M10-P is does not have a silent shutter.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed, the M10-P does not have a silent shutter. However, it is the quietest shutter that Leica has produced in any digital camera. It is so quiet that I bought one to replace my noisy m240-P.

It is so quiet that most people don't hear the shutter when being photographed, and yet there is the confirming 'click' heard by me, when taking a shot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...