Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I wanted to see how well (or poorly) my TL2 could be coaxed into producing infrared or near-infrared photographs.  So I started this informational topic to pass along some of what I found out.

I used infrared film only very occasionally during my predominantly film days, but there were times when it was just the ticket.  One of my favorite B&W films was and still is Ilford's near-infrared SFX-200 processed in PMK Pyro, both for normal and occasionally for near-infrared photos (but that's another story).

It turns out that the TL2's sensor collects an impressive amount of infrared light.  (Simple test: try viewing the business end of an IR TV remote through the camera.  If you can see the IR diode--I assume it's a diode--light up when pressed, then you've got something to work with.)  The TL2 shows the diode very well.  So did the X2, but the X2 didn't fare nearly so well once I tried using it with IR filters.  The exposure times were way too long.

Getting the TL2 converted to Infrared is an option, and one that will preserve exposure times we are more used to.  Filters, as you all know, slow exposure times down.  But if you only use IR occasionally, as I do, IR conversion of the camera isn't a desirable option.  So I experimented with filters, and the results are as follows:

I used three filters on the TL2 in various types of scenes.  The three filters were--in order of ascending visible light filtration--first, the B+W 092 (which Schneider says "...blocks visible light up to 650 nm, and at just below 700 nm it allows 50% to pass through ....  From from 730nm to 2,000 nm the transmittance is very high at over 90%").   The second (perhaps the Goldilocks filter) was the HOYA R72 Infrared, which is designed to pass 95% of the light between 760nm and 860nm.  The third, and darkest, filter was the B+W 093 which . . . well, I'll let them tell it: "blocks the entire visible light spectrum.  It therefore appears black and in contrast to the B+W 092 infrared filter 695, it enables shots in pure infrared without the visible red.  The transmittance does not exceed 1% until 800nm, but increases to 88% at 900nm."  

I'll put results in subsequent posts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First let's look at this scene.  Here it is in color.18mm, -2/3 EV.  f/5.6, 1/3,200 sec. exposure, ISO 1600.

 

And here's the B&W jpg, straight out of the camera.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

NOTE: ALL INFRARED FILTERED IMAGES ARE JPG FILES, STRAIGHT FROM CAMERA.

B+W 092

1/10 sec. exposure (everything else the same as above).

 

HOYA R72

1/4 sec. exposure

 

Edited by bcorton
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's one more sequence.  ISO 1600, f/5.6, 1/4000 sec., -2/3 EV, lens at 18mm.

(NOTE ESPECIALLY THE LEAVES IN THE UPPER RIGHT HAND CORNER AS THEY DISAPPEAR AND REAPPEAR VIS A VIS THE SKY VALUES)

color:

 

B&W straight out of camera

Edited by bcorton
Link to post
Share on other sites

B+W 092

1/8 sec. exposure

 

HOYA R72

1/4 sec. exposure

 

B+W 093

6 sec. exposure

Edited by bcorton
Link to post
Share on other sites

Leica CL 25mm Canon with Leitz IR filter (from 1970s) ISO800 f4 1s again a dreary day.

Edited by tommonego@gmail.com
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, RCM9 said:

Thank you for sharing. I have had my TL2 now for several months and take it with me almost everywhere I go. This series has given me several ideas. Thank you for opening my eyes to something I would not have considered. 

RC 

Thank you for commenting and you are welcome.   I was so jazzed when I chimped the first results on the back of the camera and realized the TL2 was quite capable of IR photography.  It was a revelation.  I hoped sharing would help someone else.  Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Marac said:

Great to play with IR filters

 

I had my old T converted to IR 830 now it shoots at normal speeds in gorgeous IR.

Yes.  I saw your posts and images on another thread.  Unfortunately, I traded my old T in on the TL2.  If I had thought about infrared at the time, I might have done the same.  'Live and learn, eh?

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, tommonego@gmail.com said:

Leica CL 25mm Canon with Leitz IR filter (from 1970s) ISO800 f4 1s again a dreary day.

Thanks for that.  The image is very lovely: vintage seeming.  There is almost something platinum print-like about it.

Do you have any idea what wavelengths the old Leica IR filter passes?

Edited by bcorton
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure about the filter's wave length, it is very dark red but not opaque, much darker than the Red 29 I have. IR works best on a sunny day, just got inspired to try after reading your post. Obviously ISO 800 and one second exposures aren't a usable formula. But I did a lot of IR photography back in the 70's and 80's. May still pick up an M8 which didn't have an IR masking filter. Having problems finding 41mm filters for my 25 Canon and 35 Canada Summilux.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, CL with 23 Summicron, a Wratten 29 gel ISO 800 1/640 sec f4. This is interesting with High Speed Infrared film this would give a light weight IR rendition, doesn't do much with a full spectrum sensor. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, tommonego@gmail.com said:

OK the sun came out same scene CL 25 Canon, Leitz IR filter ISO 800, 1/5 sec f4

Interesting.  This has a very similar feel to the "dreary day" image using the same filter.  Go figure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By kalifornier
      Lupines are blanketing the areas around Folsom Lake. Here are a few images from a morning visit. All pics/panoramas taken with TL2/18-56 mm combo. It was frustrating to watch people trample wildflowers for their dumb selfies and/or kid portraits as well as 'professional' photogs doing model shoots and dragging all their gear on the flowers.

       

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By sandro
      Does anyone know when the infrared marks on Leitz/Leica lenses were not used anymore? I am checking my own lenses:
      Hektor 13,5 cm (1956): yes; Elmar 135 mm (1962): no
      Elmar 9 cm (1937): yes; Elmar 9 cm (1952): yes; Elmar 9 cm collapsible (1954): yes; Elmar 90mm (1962, new version or II): no
      Summicron 50mm II (1960): no; Summicron 50mm III (1968): no
      Summitar 50mm (1948): yes
      Summar 5 cm (1937): yes
      Elmar 5 cm (1939): yes
      None of my 3,5cm/35mm lenses has the R-mark
      Best, Lex
    • By MikeMyers
      I think this is an impossible question to ask, without someone seeing it in person, but back in the 1960's and 70's I accumulated a small collection of Leica gear, most of which went into storage when I got into digital.  Then Leica came out with the M8 and M8.2, so I bought one as soon as I could afford it.  When I read about the problem the camera had with infrared, for me that was a bonus - I wanted to take infrared photos, and now I had a chance.  I did this back in 2009 and 2010, and then I mostly moved on to other things.  I've now got a M10, and all my other gear is put away in drawers, but I again want to start taking infrared photos.
      50 or so years ago I got what was supposed to be a Leica infrared filter that screws into my equally old 50mm Summicron.  There are no markings on the filter, but I've been using it all this time.  I know there are several filters I can buy nowadays, but my first question is whether anyone recognizes this as a Leica filter.  Did Leica make several variations of this, or was this "it".  
      It's nice that I can take hand-held photos with the M8.2 using this filter.  
      A related question is about focusing.  I read that on the 50mm Summicron, I need to focus normally, then take the distance mark on the lens and turn the focus adjustment such that this mark is now opposite the f/5.6 mark that's used for depth of field.  (from here:  https://www.photo.net/discuss/threads/why-no-ir-mark-on-summicron-50mm.162704/ )
      I'm surprised there are no markings on the filter.  

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By Andrk
      Hi guys, 
      I am sure this topic is covered over and over again, but I can't help starting a new thread to help me out in a very difficult decision. It feels like a very difficult decision anyway. 
      Some background: I have been photographing for the past 15 years, and for a few of those professionally. I have been a strong Nikon fan throughout (sorry for swearing in the church), but have also owned and used a lot of film cameras, such as Mamiya, Hasselblad 2000FCW, Canon and Nikon 35mm film cameras. I would say i am a fairly decent photographer with, maybe, a bigger passion and lust than talent. :)
      Two years ago soon my son was born, and I just didn't bring the big cameras with me any longer, and I missed capturing those moments. I stopped all professional photography to make time for family and my day job. I sold all my other cameras, DSLRs and film alike to buy a new, smaller, more handy one. That I actually would bring with me everywhere and take photos. I never bought one, and now I miss I so much. So I started the hunt for the best camera for ME. 
      I have been googling, foruming all across, and I just don't know how to drill it down any further and decide on the actual camera to buy. One thing I do know is that it is going to be a Leica. I just love Leicas philosophy, the picture quality, the "to the roots" thing, and I have decided once and for all that now is the time for me to finally own a Leica. 
      I also know that I am on a budget. Coming in at a total of 2000 USD would be ideal - but if course, Leica is not cheap and there are many factors here. So anywhere between 1000-3000 USD is something I look at. 
      For that money you could buy either a Leica CL kit brand new, Leica TL2 brand new, a used Leica Q, used Leica M9. 
      I am not a rangefinder guy really, but I really like the concept. However, I will use the camera for many different scenarios such as travel photo, family photo, art works that I do, and just general hobby/art photography. 
      I don't do any studio work any longer, so that I don't need, I don't do street photography in that sense, and I don't to long tele situation photography like concerts or sports. So basically, I do everyday photography and would like my photos to be nice to have, maybe frame them, and if I find time again start taking art work photos again. But let's focus on travel, everyday life typ photo. 
      Now - what do you guys think? Where should I place my bets? I guess many of you have tried many of the cameras - which one do you believe I will be happier with?
      Thank you so much! I appreciate all and any input!
       
       
    • By simonCL
      Hi everyone! Nice to finally make the decision to join this community. 
       
      I made the switch to Leica from Nikon last year when I purchased the CL with a 23mm Summicron f2. 
       
      I absolutely love the camera and the setup for the type of photography I do. 
       
      at the moment, my current setup is the CL with a f/1.4 Super Takuma 50mm (thorium glass model). 
×
×
  • Create New...