Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Looking at a preowned CL. Anybody know how to bring up the shutter count?  Appreciate it.

 

Edited by colmac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
On 8/12/2019 at 2:54 PM, colmac said:

Looking at a preowned CL. Anybody know how to bring up the shutter count? 

No way sorry. Leica is incapable to understand that we may need to buy or sell its stuff second hand... 

Edited by lct

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure Leica CLs record shutter counts somewhere for statistical purposes, e.g. field performance vs product specs. MFT Lumix cameras conceal shutter counts well, but they are accessible to Pana technicians and dexterous users. 😀

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, colmac said:

I'm sure Leica CLs record shutter counts somewhere for statistical purposes, e.g. field performance vs product specs. MFT Lumix cameras conceal shutter counts well, but they are accessible to Pana technicians and dexterous users. 😀

I'm sure of one thing only sorry. Shutter counts did work on my M8.2 but since then neither on my M240 nor on my digital CL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shutter count is rather irrelevant with cameras that have electronic shutters and video. A camera may be heavily used and still show a very low number of shutter actuations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, jaapv said:

Shutter count is rather irrelevant with cameras that have electronic shutters and video. A camera may be heavily used and still show a very low number of shutter actuations.

Then it proves that the shutter is not worn at least. I see zero reason for sellers and buyers to ignore the truth. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

As shutters can run for well over 100.000 actuations, I still think that things like wear and damage are far more important. Better a well-cared for 20.000 camera then a 5000 one that has been through the wars.

As most shutter failures are catastrophic and I have never seen a camera with a worn shutter, I don't think that a low number of actuations is any kind of guaranty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why stop at the shutter count? The battery lids have failed on more of my cameras than did the shutters. What about a battery lid actuation counter? While we're at it, add a storage card removal counter. The storage card compartments fail alarmingly often. And focusing? With the modern autofocus lenses, many more components are put under stress by refocusing the lens. I absolutely demand a focus actuation counter. I want objective evidence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, dau said:

Why stop at the shutter count? The battery lids have failed on more of my cameras than did the shutters. What about a battery lid actuation counter? While we're at it, add a storage card removal counter. The storage card compartments fail alarmingly often. And focusing? With the modern autofocus lenses, many more components are put under stress by refocusing the lens. I absolutely demand a focus actuation counter. I want objective evidence.

The same could be said about cars. Would you buy a car w/o knowing its mileage because the seller assures you that you don't need to count miles more so than gearbox or brakes actuation? Mileage as well as shutter count are objective evidences buyers, at least this one, are after.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, lct said:

Go explain this on e**y or elsewhere. Buyers want objective evidences, and rightly so IMHO. 

But the point is that it is not objective. Using the electronic shutter will keep the count on zero, despite the camera being worn to the bone. The same for video. Getting dust in the shutter will kill it after relatively few exposures.

That some people want meaningless figures doesn't make the numbers more relevant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jaapv said:

But the point is that it is not objective. Using the electronic shutter will keep the count on zero, despite the camera being worn to the bone. The same for video.

But again it proves something objective, the good health of the shutter. Nothing can excuse that lack of transparency to me. YMMV.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No it does not prove the health of the shutter. They fail because of mechanical reasons, not because of wear. Shutters don’t wear down for many tens of thousands of actuations, up to hundreds of thousands. The chance of a breakdown of a fairly new shutter is about the same as a well-used one. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Go tell this on e**y or elsewhere again. Just a matter of truth. If you don't need to know it so much the better for you :cool:.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why should anybody tell it? Shuttercount unknown by design. Endof.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...