Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My supposition, never found from some right source.

Simply 200 ISO, if it's the same as M10.

Considering it was 160 ISO but not easy to set if not in the menu.

As 100 ISO is  kind of "pull" in my use since early 2017, I'd say base ISO160 or 200 not really different.

ISO 200 is the most use and when I use at ISO 100, I've found shorter dynamic and not better noise.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Somewhere around 135-150 - even Leica (Stefan Daniel) was not very specific when asked. For all variants of the M10 (-P, -D, etc.)

100 is a definite "pull" - overexposed and corrected in the camera processing. Risks blown highlights, but has less-noisy shadows

200 is a slight "push" - slightly better retention of highlights, but also slightly noisier.

It was discussed at length 2 years ago, just after the M10 intro. Leica originally allowed Auto ISO to select down 100, but changed the base of Auto ISO to 200 at some point with new firmware.

It has been a point of contention that there is no way (dial, menu, Auto) to actually select the true Base ISO.

Although to my thinking, setting 100 or 200 and then exposing for 135 or 160 (100 underexposed .3-.7 stops, or 200 overexposed .3 or .7 stops), and just brightening or darkening a touch in post-processing, amounts to the same amount of light and same amount of brightness as being able to set "135" or "160" in the first place.

Edited by adan
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...