Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Sorry for double-posting, but this is a pressing decision, as I am about to take a long trip with my family!

 

I'm looking for some feedback on these lenses. The short story is that I sold off all my M equipment, including a 75 lux, some 8 years ago. I've now decided to get back in because, after borrowing a friend's camera, I found that I take more interesting pictures with the system!

 

Anyway, I had a 75, but only briefly. It takes beautiful pictures. I found it a bit awkward, however, because it is big, block part of the viewfinder, and is heavy to use. I don't feel that, aside from ergonomics, it has any drawbacks. Also, I usually stop down.

 

Meanwhile, in my absence the 75/2 has come out. Obviously, I haven't had a chance to use one. It is very attractive in that it has a newer design that optimizes close-up performance and the ergonomics, or at least size, are more attractive.

 

Questions: I rarely shoot wide-open (it's not my thing) but I'm wondering what is the difference in depth of field in the 1-3 meter range between both lenses? Minimal at best?

 

Can anyone compare the handling?

 

Is the 75, while sharper on paper (hard to imagine!) actually "sharper" in practive?

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...