Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
}{B

Fomapan Retropan 320 soft

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I've just come across this Black and White film which is new to me and I was wondering if anyone has used it and if so what they thought of it? I'm familiar with both Fomapan100 and 200 and have developed them in Ilfosol 3 with good results for scanning. Foma recommend their own special brew for developing but do give a limited number of other options.

I'm thinking of picking up a couple of rolls to experiment with and any thoughts on this film would be welcome. I'll be using Ilfosol 3 and my usual developing time is 5 minutes with agitation to start and at the end of every minute. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, haven't tried it yet. Is this the stock that has little anti-halation property? If so that might explain the "soft" characteristic.

I have recently tried Fomopan (Arista) 100 & 400 and have liked the films - especially how they dry totally flat for scanning. I've tried both DD-X and Rodinal on these, and prefer Rodinal for tonality and "sharpness" (acutance). They seemed a bit soft in DD-X.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've now read a bit about it and it is the one with anti-halation properties. It also appears to have a propensity to exhibit grain. This may be more to do with the developer being used although the examples I've seen online developed in Foma's own brew showed obvious grain.

I'll pick up a couple of rolls to try as I've got a batch of Ilford Delta films ready to be processed .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried some a couple of years back, the guy who I buy my Foma stuff from had some, and I tried a roll or two.

I haven't gone back to it though, and this normally tells me something. My process is usually R09, and this possibly isn't the recommended soup, but it's what I use.

If needed, I'll dig out some shots, but recall them being "soft(ish)" (no surprise there I suppose) and grainy (and the grain could be the developer not the film).

But, try it yourself, and be sure of what it really is like, I am sure that for some subjects it will be perfect. At the time I was using Fomopan 100 and 200 and they "seemed" more all-round for what I was shooting.

Gary

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. It does appear that this film has 'special qualities' one of which could be excessive grain. I'll pick up a couple of rolls and develop one in my usual chemistry and see what I get. I'll probably buy a few rolls of Fomapan 200 at the same time. At least I know where I am with that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve tried a couple of rolls, and have one on the go at the moment.  I’ve posted a couple of foggy day example in the past in the I Like Film thread so perhaps not ideal examples but it may give you some idea. In my experience I have found that It is grainy and soft but that may be no bad thing.  If I recall the example were also developed in Ilfosol 3, and scanned on my Paton. Before using it I read that it is better at ISO 250 rather than box speed and again the examples were at that speed.

Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...