Jump to content

Voigtländer Color-Skopar 21mm f/3.5 VM Vintage Line


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi everyone!

Voigtländer’s two most recent vintage lenses have been widely available for quite a few months, but I find very few “real life” reviews on line, and none from the usual suspects :)

specifically, I am looking for feedback on personal experience/testing with the  Color-Skopar 21mm f/3.5 VM on digital Ms (not curious about other 21mm lenses, nor Sony mount version, nor speculation based on specs sheet, nor inferences from the 35mm Ultron nor general talk about VM lenses).

Anyone in this forum actually used the lens with a digital M yet? If yes, how did it perform for you (resolution/contrast, potential quirks in corners, distortion, vignetting, rendering in general, focusing reliability, etc) ? Please forgive me if the specific performance topic was already discussed in detail in this forum.

Or can you point to any (good) output-based  review blog/video (found one  using film M, a couple showing lens rather than discussing performance and plenty of reviews for E-mount version)?

Or simply pictures shot through the lens (preferably high res downloads)? i have seen the promotional picture samples published at launch, so no need to point there! :)

Thanks beforehand!

Edited by Balivernes
Link to post
Share on other sites

We've been discussing about this recently. Did yo do a search on the forum? In a nutshell it works fine on my M240 without any disturbing color shift, it is a sharp lens indeed, sharper than the CV 21/4 at wide aperture, but it shows more CA than the latter.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, lct said:

We've been discussing about this recently. Did yo do a search on the forum? In a nutshell it works fine on my M240 without any disturbing color shift, it is a sharp lens indeed, sharper than the CV 21/4 at wide aperture, but it shows more CA than the latter.

 

1 hour ago, a.noctilux said:

Thanks both.

I had seen that combined 21/35 thread but missed the couple of posts discussing specifically the 21 on M240, and comparing it with CV 21/4.

@lct ‘s experience is encouraging of course but I’d love to read something comparing the 21/3.5 with Leica’s own 21 SE or older elmarit asph (a lens I know from my M6 days). The SE was my preferred option....until the new CV 21/3.5 was launched at half the price of a good 2nd hand copy of the 21 SE (cannot afford that one new).

Always the same dilemma.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the Super-Elmar 21/3.4 as well. Similar sharpness with less CA than the CV 21/3.5. It is a bulkier lens though. Feels better balanced on my Ms than on the digital CL and has not the focus stick of the CV 21/3.5. I much prefer the regular Leica's or CV 21/4's focus tab personally. I have also the Elmarit 21/2.8 asph which has a bit less micro contrast and shows more color shift at corners and edges on the M240. Never tried it on the CL due to its larger size. Only reason to keep it is f/2.8 AFAIC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By jaspervanduuren
      Because Voigtlander has released the VM Apo Lanthar 50 mm I thought you might be interested to see a comparison of the Apo Summicron and the Apo Lanthar. 
      I have tested with the Sony A7R4.  If you see the pictures you can hardly tell them apart. The Apo Lantar is a gem for its money. Contrast and sharpness of both lenses are full open already impressive. The Leica has the advantage that it has the same quality and is even smaller then the Lanthar
      For all pictures see 

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!  
    • By crony
      Hi, there is a lively discussion of the 35 and 50 Leica Apos. This made me look how my Voigtländer Apo-Lanthar 2/50 behaves (M9 - f2) :

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!  
      Crops :

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!  
       
       

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By Al Brown
      This awesome 21mm lens with f/1.4 f-stop totally deserves its own thread.

      The popularity of fast wide M lenses among Leica photographers seems to drop as soon as one drifts away from the optical viewfinder lines of the eternal 28mm / 35mm / 50mm trinity. Leica even went as far as to discontinue its entire 24mm M line of lenses at some point in 2020, including the precious Summilux 24.
      Yet for reportage, conventions, events, concerts, wedding receptions and people photography, a fast wide angle is usually priceless. What the Summilux 21 f/1.4 offers over other slower (f/1.8 to f/3.4) lenses from the 21mm scuderia (there are not many for the M, although Voigtlander and TTArtisan offer direct competition with same or very similar f-stop) is the incredible separation of the subject from the background, an amazing feature for a wide angle lens. The 21 lux is of course a Karbe masterpiece, Erwin Puts even said in one of his articles that "If you compare the 1.4/21 with the 0.95/50mm you see comparable quality."

      Please post your images and share your experience with the 21 lux - everything from series VIII/8 filters and other adapted filter solutions to your experience with this light beast in the field and on assignments, preferrably wide open. This is NOT a SEM thread, but a comparison between the two is OK.
    • By Slash53
      Hi there,
      I purchased the Voigtlander 35mm f2 Ultron about 6 months ago at my local Leica store. I have a problem regarding the focus ring; it's a bit loose in a way where I can move the focus ring horizontally and vertically (about a mm or so). Its not a big movement or anything but I can feel the loose when I'm trying to accurately focus an image. I've never seen anyone mentioning this problem from this lens., or any Voigtlander lens in this matter. I wonder if any user had such an issue or if I'm getting crazy about small stuff.
      Thanks in advance for the answers,
      Renaud
    • By eyespeak
      Hallo Leute,
      nachdem ich mir manchmal denke, das man nur einmal lebt, muss jetzt eine M240er her. Aus meiner Sicht gerade preislich ein guter Einstieg in das M System. Gesagt getan. Meine Traumlinse, das Leica Summilux-M 24mm 1.4 ASPH ist mir aber einfach zu teuer - und zu schwer.
      Ich wusste, wenn es mal eine M wird, dann ist das Voigtländer Classic Collection Nokton 35mm 1.4 auf jeden Fall meine engere Wahl.
      Meine Frage: Auf was sollte man achten? Es gibt auch SC und MC, und warum gibt es diese kaum gebraucht, oder bin ich blind?
      Danke schon mal.
       
      Euch allen schon mal eine gute Zeit. Möge das Jahr 2021 besser werden als dieses!
       
       
×
×
  • Create New...