Jump to content
Balivernes

Voigtländer Color-Skopar 21mm f/3.5 VM Vintage Line

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi everyone!

Voigtländer’s two most recent vintage lenses have been widely available for quite a few months, but I find very few “real life” reviews on line, and none from the usual suspects :)

specifically, I am looking for feedback on personal experience/testing with the  Color-Skopar 21mm f/3.5 VM on digital Ms (not curious about other 21mm lenses, nor Sony mount version, nor speculation based on specs sheet, nor inferences from the 35mm Ultron nor general talk about VM lenses).

Anyone in this forum actually used the lens with a digital M yet? If yes, how did it perform for you (resolution/contrast, potential quirks in corners, distortion, vignetting, rendering in general, focusing reliability, etc) ? Please forgive me if the specific performance topic was already discussed in detail in this forum.

Or can you point to any (good) output-based  review blog/video (found one  using film M, a couple showing lens rather than discussing performance and plenty of reviews for E-mount version)?

Or simply pictures shot through the lens (preferably high res downloads)? i have seen the promotional picture samples published at launch, so no need to point there! :)

Thanks beforehand!

Edited by Balivernes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We've been discussing about this recently. Did yo do a search on the forum? In a nutshell it works fine on my M240 without any disturbing color shift, it is a sharp lens indeed, sharper than the CV 21/4 at wide aperture, but it shows more CA than the latter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, lct said:

We've been discussing about this recently. Did yo do a search on the forum? In a nutshell it works fine on my M240 without any disturbing color shift, it is a sharp lens indeed, sharper than the CV 21/4 at wide aperture, but it shows more CA than the latter.

 

1 hour ago, a.noctilux said:

Thanks both.

I had seen that combined 21/35 thread but missed the couple of posts discussing specifically the 21 on M240, and comparing it with CV 21/4.

@lct ‘s experience is encouraging of course but I’d love to read something comparing the 21/3.5 with Leica’s own 21 SE or older elmarit asph (a lens I know from my M6 days). The SE was my preferred option....until the new CV 21/3.5 was launched at half the price of a good 2nd hand copy of the 21 SE (cannot afford that one new).

Always the same dilemma.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the Super-Elmar 21/3.4 as well. Similar sharpness with less CA than the CV 21/3.5. It is a bulkier lens though. Feels better balanced on my Ms than on the digital CL and has not the focus stick of the CV 21/3.5. I much prefer the regular Leica's or CV 21/4's focus tab personally. I have also the Elmarit 21/2.8 asph which has a bit less micro contrast and shows more color shift at corners and edges on the M240. Never tried it on the CL due to its larger size. Only reason to keep it is f/2.8 AFAIC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By eyespeak
      Hallo Leute,
      nachdem ich mir manchmal denke, das man nur einmal lebt, muss jetzt eine M240er her. Aus meiner Sicht gerade preislich ein guter Einstieg in das M System. Gesagt getan. Meine Traumlinse, das Leica Summilux-M 24mm 1.4 ASPH ist mir aber einfach zu teuer - und zu schwer.
      Ich wusste, wenn es mal eine M wird, dann ist das Voigtländer Classic Collection Nokton 35mm 1.4 auf jeden Fall meine engere Wahl.
      Meine Frage: Auf was sollte man achten? Es gibt auch SC und MC, und warum gibt es diese kaum gebraucht, oder bin ich blind?
      Danke schon mal.
       
      Euch allen schon mal eine gute Zeit. Möge das Jahr 2021 besser werden als dieses!
       
       
    • By BogotaHorribLe
      M8 Monochrom, Voigtlander 35mm 1.4 @ 1/125 at f5.7 ISO 400 at the Dunkin on the corner of 97th and Madison in Manhattan's Upper East Side.

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By Dennis
      Hi all!

      I'm planning to get a new 21mm next month. My ideal FL would be a 24mm, but there is not an option with my $1k budget. So I'm getting (happily) a further 21mm. Now, I know huge differences between the two, mostly for size, weight, and speed. I heard great things about the ZM 25, but I don't want to get another Zeiss for now, except for the incredible IQ and performance, I don't like very much Zeiss lenses.
      I love the idea of a small and light $700 21mm lens, like a pancake. With wide angles (21-24-28), I really like to shoot at f/5.6-8, I never had a fast wide lens, so I never use it less than 2.8 with these FL. 
      But I also like the fact that 1.4 gives about 3 extra stops. What for? Environment portraits with shallow DOP, milky way, indoor low light, etc. It's certainly an advantage, but it comes with enormous size and weight. It's not a lens that you carry all day long, so I'm not afraid about weight and size. I can live with that. I would get of course an external VF. And, by the way, I really love the Nokton lens hood shape 🙂 Beautiful.

      My question for you guys, if you can share your feedback, it's how both lenses perform in the f/4-f/8 range. This is what I would love to know. The price difference is not so big, so I'could🤷‍♂️ get the Nokton. But if at these apertures performs a little bit worst than Color-Skopar, I don't care to lose three stops, if I have better quality. I like the modern look and sharp images.
      A minimal background: I own an M10 + 2.8/35 ZM and a 50mm Cron V. I don't have a budget now to get another Leica, so I would love to try out a Voigtlander; it would be my first.
      Thank you in advance for your opinions.
       
       
    • By Ertos
      Here is my review of the Voigtlander 21mm f1.4 - in short: I really like it! 
      https://www.erwinhartenbergphoto.com/post/wide-angle-wonder-how-i-ended-up-with-a-voigtlander-21-mm-f1-4-nokton-asph-vm

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
×
×
  • Create New...