smartbot Posted March 20, 2019 Share #1 Posted March 20, 2019 Advertisement (gone after registration) Leica Rumors just posted a comparison (from Photons To Photos) of the Leica Q2 sensor vs Q1 and it found that it was more noisy. Has anyone noticed this in their photos? Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! https://leicarumors.com/2019/03/20/leica-q2-sensor-measurements-published-at-photonstophotos-compared-with-leica-m10-sl-nikon-d850.aspx/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! https://leicarumors.com/2019/03/20/leica-q2-sensor-measurements-published-at-photonstophotos-compared-with-leica-m10-sl-nikon-d850.aspx/ ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/295412-q2-sensor-noise/?do=findComment&comment=3706622'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted March 20, 2019 Posted March 20, 2019 Hi smartbot, Take a look here Q2 Sensor Noise?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
SrMi Posted March 20, 2019 Share #2 Posted March 20, 2019 7 minutes ago, smartbot said: Leica Rumors just posted a comparison (from Photons To Photos) of the Leica Q2 sensor vs Q1 and it found that it was more noisy. Has anyone noticed this in their photos? Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! https://leicarumors.com/2019/03/20/leica-q2-sensor-measurements-published-at-photonstophotos-compared-with-leica-m10-sl-nikon-d850.aspx/ This graphs cannot be used to compare cameras. The source of the graph writes: "These raw values are not appropriate for comparing camera models because they are not adjusted for gain or area." We need to wait for data in "Photographic Dynamic Range Chart" to do any comparisons. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tnturnerx1 Posted March 22, 2019 Share #3 Posted March 22, 2019 I was wondering about the same Leica Rumors bit. All of the graphs shown, except for some short segments, showed the Q2 not faring very well w/respect to the competitors (including Q1). But SrMi's qualification is a consideration I'll have to watch for. Thanks Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scroy Posted March 22, 2019 Share #4 Posted March 22, 2019 On 3/20/2019 at 5:47 PM, SrMi said: This graphs cannot be used to compare cameras. The source of the graph writes: "These raw values are not appropriate for comparing camera models because they are not adjusted for gain or area." We need to wait for data in "Photographic Dynamic Range Chart" to do any comparisons. Dynamic Range vs ISO below - looks like the page was just updated http://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm#Leica Q (Typ 116),Leica Q2 Interesting similar characteristics except at ISO 400. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dkmoore Posted March 23, 2019 Share #5 Posted March 23, 2019 Not the only credible reviewer that found this. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.