Jump to content

Q2 high iso images


Recommended Posts

in order of 3200, 6400, 12500, 25000, 50000

Default LR Sharpening and no NR

3200 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr

6400 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr

12500 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr

25000 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr

50000 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, viramati said:

Thanks so much for this Dan. So I'm beginning to see banding at iso 25000 which is pretty good though not quite up there with the Sony A7rIII sensor. A huge improvement on the Q

Let's see shall we, here's the Q1

Q1 - 3200 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr

Q1 - 6400 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr

Q1 - 12500 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr

Q1 - 25000 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr

Q1 - 50000 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dancook said:

in order of 3200, 6400, 12500, 25000, 50000

Default LR Sharpening and no NR

3200 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr

6400 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr

12500 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr

25000 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr

50000 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr

 

the 25000 would look very cool in b&w :)

Edited by frame-it
Link to post
Share on other sites

Reset and re-exported Q2 files after I updated Adobe software

3200 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr

6400 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr

12500 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr

25000 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr

50000 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Reposting my question here (missed this thread, sorry :( )

What about shutter speed at high ISO? The Q was limited in bulb mode when pushing ISO high. Not handy for night photography.

Is it now possible to make long exposures with ISO at 3200 or 6400? Does it still require the NR frame to be taken before the shot?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ufuk.

I am not really interested in the super high ISO settings, I never use them.

I would like to know if the shutter length has been increased at 3200 or 6400 ISO compared to the Q, which would also mean a better performance of the sensor in my opinion (the length limit of the Q was probably there to preserve image quality).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...