Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Leica today announces the much-heralded 35mm Apo-Summicron lens for the SL system.

Back in October when we were with the LHSA group at Wetzlar, designer Peter Karbe was clearly very enthusiastic about the future product and felt that it could be one of the finest optics ever produced by Leica. 

It fills a gap in the SL lens line-up but comes at a time when the L-Mount Alliance is broadening the appeal of the standard. From the outset, the 35mm App-Summicron will complement not just Leica’s own SL but also the two new Panasonic, the S1 and S1R.

https://www.macfilos.com/2019/02/28/leica-launches-apo-summicron-sl-35mm-f2-asph/

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Lins-Barroso
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you, Jono, for the wonderful report and astonishing photos. I see you linked it at DP Review as well, where the remarks will likely focus on its price. Some things, however, merit their price. Wow!

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The question is, for users who have yet to own neither, what is the point of getting the Summilux-TL 35mm f/1.4 now that the SL 35/2 APO has finally arrived? The SL 35/2 on the CL / TL2 is not that much longer / larger than the TL 35/1.4, but offers the same focal length of 52.5mm and an equivalent aperture (APS-C f/1.4 = FF f/2), along with weather-sealing to boot, and being able to utilize all 24 megapixels of both CL and SL cameras, unlike the other way around. 

Getting the SL 35/2 gives you a high quality 35mm on SL and a 52mm f2 on CL that uses both sensors fully, but getting the TL 35/1.4 only gets you a 10MP 52mm image on SL, without weather-sealing.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think having both 35s available, to a CL owner is like having both the 50 Summilux-asph and the APO Summicron 50s on the Leica M.  Such a terrible fate!  I suspect there may be similar tendencies in their respective renderings, although the CL 35/1.4 is perhaps a bit more restrained in its rendering than the 50 SX.  What actually happens shooting will depend on the photographer but I predict that this line of argument will dominate the pubtalk.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, jonoslack said:

It's a corker!

 

My take on the APO-Summicron 35mm SL Asph

 

All the best

Jono

Thank you - a good read, and images, as always!

Do you have the Summilux-TL 35 Asph? And have you been able to compare the image quality of both on the CL?

Physical size would be one reason for preferring the Summilux-TL; I don't 'need' a 35 on my SL, for what I use it for.

Edited by LocalHero1953
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LocalHero1953 said:

Thank you - a good read, and images, as always!

Do you have the Summilux-TL 35 Asph? And have you been able to compare the image quality of both on the CL?

Physical size would be one reason for preferring the Summilux-TL; I don't 'need' a 35 on my SL, for what I use it for.

Hi there Paul - I did have one for some time, but sadly not any more. But I do think that the defocus/bokeh on the APO is nicer than the 'lux. I'm not sure there's much difference in size, but there is certainly a difference in price!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice examples as usual - I'm a fan since the first report of the SL. But in the end I have to pass this lens - the SL 16-35 is "good enough" for me. I will wait for the 28 mm Summicron - that is probably also 'a corker' and in R lenses the choice is limited (in 28mm). (While I already have a bunch of 35mm lenses in M or R).

Will anybody make a shootout between this lens and the Sigma 35mm ? And the SL 16-35 ? Or the Sigma 2.0/24-35 ?    :unsure:

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, jonoslack said:

Hi there Paul - I did have one for some time, but sadly not any more. But I do think that the defocus/bokeh on the APO is nicer than the 'lux. I'm not sure there's much difference in size, but there is certainly a difference in price!

Thanks. I don't have either (but I've been thinking about the Summilux-TL). I suspected that might be the case from the exceptional look of the images I'm getting from the Apo-Summicron-SL 90.

From specs the two have a similar diameter, but the Summilux-TL is about 2/3 length and weight.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...