Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Is it possible for a manual focus lens to be out of focus when focused properly on an SL??

I was wondering... I have an F1 Noctilux and focusing a NON MOVING target on a tripod. I thought if it is focused in the EVF (using mag)... that should be the best possible focus I could achieve.

I'm not sure if my eyes are playing tricks on me.... but it seems that the focus point is off a tiny bit as compared to a different area.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In practice mirrorless always delivers images as it was focused.  Any unsharpness you see could have been induced at the moment you pressed shutter even with camera on tripod, maybe earth moved or you shook the camera.

In my experience M lenses that were at times unsharp on M camera and sometimes provided images with some gorgeous character are now all bland and perfectly in focus when used on SL 😁

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mmradman said:

In practice mirrorless always delivers images as it was focused.  Any unsharpness you see could have been induced at the moment you pressed shutter even with camera on tripod, maybe earth moved or you shook the camera.

In my experience M lenses that were at times unsharp on M camera and sometimes provided images with some gorgeous character are now all bland and perfectly in focus when used on SL 😁

Focus on left red knob... and cropped a bit. Seems OK I guess...

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Donzo98
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Appears there was slight movement of the camera.  Try using the self timer to delay release of the shutter and use electronic shutter.  

Also, check the eyepiece diopter adjustment is set correctly for your eyes.   My eyes play tricks on me, and occasionally I need to change diopter settings.  Tired eyes vs. fresh eyes, young eyes may not have any issues but who here is young?  

Edited by darylgo
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, darylgo said:

 

Appears there was slight movement of the camera.  Try using the self timer to delay release of the shutter and use electronic shutter.  

Also, check the eyepiece diopter adjustment is set correctly for your eyes.   My eyes play tricks on me, and occasionally I need to change diopter settings.  Tired eyes vs. fresh eyes, young eyes may not have any issues but who here is young?  

This was handheld... at F1. Good point about the adopter though. I'm 55... is that young?? LOL.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Donzo98 said:

This was handheld... at F1. Good point about the adopter though. I'm 55... is that young?? LOL.

 

Age is irelevantno but it helps with younger eyes and steadier hands. As Daryl suggested adjusting VF dioptre could be helpful.

Nice picture (second)  by the way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

29 minutes ago, mmradman said:

Age is irelevantno but it helps with younger eyes and steadier hands. As Daryl suggested adjusting VF dioptre could be helpful.

Nice picture (second)  by the way.

This is about as good as it going to get with the F1. Played with the diopter... still this is what I get. Focus on top HALF.

In terns of steady hands... I'm OK I think (I'm a neurosurgeon)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Chaemono said:

Lens looks a bit soft at the focus point. It could be a lemon. I would send it back. 

I was thinking the same, but I don't have experience with this lens.   The mtf curves say it resolves less than 10 in this off center position at f1 however there appears to be astigmatism and the curves don't support that.  The image is at close distance, so this could be normal as the curves are at infinity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe curvature of focus field? On that lens, I'd guess that the the focus is not a plane at a particular distance, but rather more close to an approximately spherical surface a constant distance from the lens (in practice its probably a more complicated non-planar surface than that). In the absence of a planar focus field you would not expect the flat surface of the milk carton to be in uniform focus. On the other hand, some lenses are designed with a flat (planar) focus field, for applications like reproduction (photographing documents) and arial surveillance.

Edited by ModernMan
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chaemono said:

Lens looks a bit soft at the focus point. It could be a lemon. I would send it back. 

The guy who sold it to me has had 6 of them... all different versions of the F1... and has been a Leica Ambassador.

He says this one is the best he has had.

Edited by Donzo98
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Donzo98 said:

In terns of steady hands... I'm OK I think (I'm a neurosurgeon)

 

:P  The worst intention tremor I have ever seen in my career as a doctor was a Neurosurgeon ...... luckily he steadied up at the last moment ..... :)

He also had a habit of catheterising himself for long operations and then refusing to let any other theatre staff go to the loo...... 

50/0.95 performance is not that good at minimum focus distance either ...... over a couple on meters and it is much better. 

Edited by thighslapper
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, thighslapper said:

:P  The worst intention tremor I have ever seen in my career as a doctor was a Neurosurgeon ...... luckily he steadied up at the last moment ..... :)

He also had a habit of catheterising himself for long operations and then refusing to let any other theatre staff go to the loo...... 

50/0.95 performance is not that good at minimum focus distance either ...... over a couple on meters and it is much better. 

I didn't realize that you were a doctor too. What was your specialty??

and wow... just wow!! LOL.

Not going the catheter route anytime soon :)

Edited by Donzo98
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chaemono said:

Lens looks a bit soft at the focus point. It could be a lemon. I would send it back. 

Don't know much about any of the Noctiluxes but i think my Summilux 75mm at max aperture has shallower DOF and i think i am getting slightly better results at closer focusing range.

If that is the best out of the set of 6 i hate to think what others are like.  So why would he sell you the best and keep others?  Does he by chance also sells elephant skin camera bags?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mmradman said:

Don't know much about any of the Noctiluxes but i think my Summilux 75mm at max aperture has shallower DOF and i think i am getting slightly better results at closer focusing range.

If that is the best out of the set of 6 i hate to think what others are like.  So why would he sell you the best and keep others?  Does he by chance also sells elephant skin camera bags?

He doesn't have 6 now... he upgraded optically over time. He sold me his only copy, and has dibs should I sell it.

He is a friend... and don't think he mis-advertised the lens to me at all. I trust him.

Here are two others shot today at F1 as well. I think the Nocti just sucks at MFD.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Edited by Donzo98
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 4 Stunden schrieb Donzo98:

The guy who sold it to me has had 6 of them... all different versions of the F1... and has been a Leica Ambassador.

He says this one is the best he has had.

The only way I would believe him is if he shipped me all six and I got to choose. I used to have two Apo 50 Summicrons. Now I have one, I kept...the sharper of the two 🤣 and I’m not even a Leica Ambassador. 

Edit - I just saw the comment above. I would still not keep the lens. Don’t you have three other 50s?

Edited by Chaemono
Link to post
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Chaemono said:

The only way I would believe him is if he shipped me all six and I got to choose. I used to have two Apo 50 Summicrons. Now I have one, I kept...the sharper of the two 🤣 and I’m not even a Leica Ambassador. 

Edit - I just saw the comment above. I would still not keep the lens. Don’t you have three other 50s?

 I have the 50 SL.. and two F1 Nocti’s.

One of the 2 F1’s are going. 

Oh yeah... I have the Nikon Noct too. The 58 :) 

The 50 SL is INSANELY GOOD wide open!! Crazy 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Donzo98
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chaemono said:

Maybe it’s time for you to go a bit more wide, like 16-35 mm? 😁 

Check this out... much better than MFD. BTW... I have the CL and 11-23 for wide angle :)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...