Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi!

Can anyone explain why Leica has chosen -0.5 as default optical correction in the OVF on the M10?

Are Leica users all wearing -0.5 glasses??

I'm using +1 glasses. According to Leica I should then use a +1.5 correction lens. Why not -0.5 +1 = +0.5 ?

When I use my +1 glasses seeing through the OVF, I see perfectly clear.  Why should I then buy a +1.5 correction lens and not a +1 correction lens?

 

Cut from Leica:

The Leica Correction Lenses M provide optimum eye-to-camera matching, making composing images in the viewfinder more precise and comfortable. They are available in grades of +/- 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 3 diopters. Please note that the Leica M-Viewfinder is preset by default to -0.5 diopters, so anyone wearing glasses of 1 diopter strength would require a +1.5 diopters correction lens.

Edited by Tanndoktorn
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 8 Minuten schrieb Tanndoktorn:

...When I use my +1 glasses seeing through the OVF, I see perfectly clear.  Why should I then buy a +1.5 correction lens and not a +1 correction lens?

Did you check it with +1.5 too?

On the other hand, if you feel fine with a +1 correction, take that one ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

Since M3 from 1954, the -0.5 correction in VF was choosen I think that was from "market study" by then.

Nothing changed since then..

Just backward move from LTM Leica which had continous diopter correction for rangefinder.

Not so simple as math to see clear in M's VF.

Best way to sort it out first time is to go to a Leica Store to try the diopters and some people just use the M with their glasses.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I wear glasses to correct for astigmatism and for distance.  But I found by using free trial diopters at a local optician that adding a +.5 diopter (still with glasses on) optimized focusing on my M10.  Years ago, with younger eyes and a different M, no diopter was needed.  

Easy to try... the only way to really know.

Jeff

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The focus patch is set at a virtual distance of 2m, so ideally one needs to see that clearly, as well as have enough eye accommodation to see the background clearly, which appears actual distance.  Eyeglass prescriptions vary for all kinds of circumstances, so one simple solution rarely fits all.  

Somewhere here others have written about the logic of the default -.5 setting.  I don’t recall the specifics, but someone will likely chime in.  Leica has obviously determined that this provides the best viewing for those with ‘normal’ vision, without resorting to aids, glasses or diopters.

Jeff

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
On 1/24/2019 at 1:04 PM, Jeff S said:

I wear glasses to correct for astigmatism and for distance.  But I found by using free trial diopters at a local optician that adding a +.5 diopter (still with glasses on) optimized focusing on my M10.  Years ago, with younger eyes and a different M, no diopter was needed.  

Easy to try... the only way to really know.

Jeff

Does one need to buy an adapter thread for M10 in order to put the diopter?

EDIT: Please ignore this, I found it on Leica web page.

Edited by mirekti
Silly me
Link to post
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, mirekti said:

Does one need to buy an adapter thread for M10 in order to put the diopter?

EDIT: Please ignore this, I found it on Leica web page.

Better to buy the new diopter specifically made for the M10.  This will provide better viewing as intended with the larger diameter VF, which offers higher magnification and better eye relief.  

Jeff

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jeff S said:

Better to buy the new diopter specifically made for the M10.  This will provide better viewing as intended with the larger diameter VF, which offers higher magnification and better eye relief.  

Jeff

Right, that’s what I meant, I found on Leica site there are M10 version released.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am 24.1.2019 um 20:33 schrieb Jeff S:

The focus patch is set at a virtual distance of 2 m [...] others have written about the logic of the default -0.5 dpt setting.  I don’t recall the specifics, but someone will likely chime in.

So you know the answer but aren't aware of it: -0.5 dpt = -2 m.

The framelines in the viewfinder are just an inch or two from your eye physically but appear as if there were 2 m/6 ft away. So the eye-piece's optics is -0.5 dpt.

.

vor 6 Stunden schrieb Jeff S:

... they also make adapters for the prior, smaller-diameter [correction lenses] ... avoid IMO.

While it is preferable to use the new correction lenses which fit the M10's eye-piece immediately, the older and smaller correction lenses on the eye-piece adapter are working just fine. In particular, there's no obstruction or narrowing of the filed-of-view.

Edited by 01af
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, dickgillberg said:

I just bought a correction lens for my M10P. -1.5 like the prescription for my right eye. It works beautifully for distances from about 1.5-2 m to infinity, but not as good for closer distances. Might be my old eyes doesn't work as they should.

One needs to account for the built-in diopter correction discussed above. See Rick’s comment in this old thread..

Better yet, experiment first with a diopter at your Leica dealer, or use a free trial diopter at your local optician.  Seeing is believing.

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, 01af said:

While it is preferable to use the new correction lenses which fit the M10's eye-piece immediately, the older and smaller correction lenses on the eye-piece adapter are working just fine. In particular, there's no obstruction or narrowing of the filed-of-view.

Maarten wrote in a prior discussion that the glass in the new diopter was larger in diameter than the old glass.  I haven’t verified,  but if so, it would seem that it might provide some viewing benefits, although I recognize that the focus patch is centered. But it’s always risky to assume.  I tend not to like adapted solutions (even lenses) when there is a more direct, native design, but that’s a personal bias. 

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...