Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I'm considering switching from dedicated film scanners to scanning with a digital camera, light pad, etc. Does anyone here know how much space between a film holder (the Flextights, for instance) and a light pad one should be aiming for to avoid picking up the texture of the latter's surface? And, does adding a slab of anti newton ring glass change that? If so, by how much?

 

Thanks,

Daniel

Edited by d.s.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the anti-Newton rings glass is only relevant when the two surfaces are very close (touching range). The further away the light is the lower the intensity. Trial and error is your best guide.

Edited by Exodies
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

My Epson flat-bed scanner's light source is essentially "a light pad" - large glowing LED-backlit panel to light the film from behind. Epson recesses theirs about 1 cm/0.5 inches behind the film, and I'd assume they know what they're doing. ;)

It should be noted that anti-newton-ring glass itself has an extremely small-scale texture or roughness of its own - microscopic "mountains" to prevent the glass and film touching all across their joined surfaces. It is scaled to be well below visual perception except as a slightly "frosted" or diffuse look in reflected light...

https://www.yoycart.com/Product/36586837075/

- but with enough camera/lens resolution, that texture may itself become visible. Shouldn't be a problem with most (< 36 Mpixel) cameras, unless one is cropping severely in-camera to a small part of the film.

Edited by adan
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...