Jump to content
jmahto

How much film do you shoot in one year?

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I completed my first year of back to film (stopped shooting film in 2003 when digital became convenient). I did shoot digital for past one year as well and it was fun to compare.

I shot around 32 rolls of film (mostly 36 frames each) and almost 90% was in M2 (rest on Nikon FM2 and Konica T2). Many were experimental but I did use it for my summer roadtrip and to capture life as well. I got around 86 pictures that I like very much. That is 7% of total. Still small but I was experimenting a lot. 

Around the same time I shot more than 6000 digital pictures (with M240 and Nex6 evenly distributed). I got around 4% keepers from that.

How much do you shoot in one year?
(Note: Nobody pays me, I shoot for myself)

All my film keepers


 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I shot 35mm film, I shot around 10 rolls per week average (some weeks (heck, some weekends!) 25, some weeks 2). About 90% color slide, often a long way from home, and with no chance to check the results - so I did a lot of experimenting in the sense of bracketing exposures, making multiple "versions" of pictures just in case, and otherwise shooting scared ("Everything I've shot so far is probably garbage, so I'd better keep looking for something better.")

I never worried about percentage of keepers, just absolute number of keepers. The latter counts on the gallery wall; nobody cares about the former.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I shoot about one 12-exposure roll of film a week. I take substantially fewer digital pictures than that - always with my iPhone. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My total last year was 62 rolls of various formats, this year I will end up shooting much the same amount plus sheet film (new for this year). The term keepers is a loose one for me, it depends, but of the negatives, I print (in the darkroom) approximately 10 - 15%.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Funny, I just did my annual count a few days ago (and didn't shoot with film since ;)): about 855 frames taken with 35 mm film (approx. 24 rolls of 36 frames), 234 frames in medium format (6x6, 6x7, and one film roll with 4x4), and 16 frames in 4x5" large format. Mix of B&W, C-41, and E-6 films, all self-developed and scanned. 

I shot with 7 analog cameras (four 35 mm ones, 2 medium-format cameras, and one large format camera). 

Edited by Martin B

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t use much film anymore and I really don’t keep a tally on how much I’ve used. No color film.  I use black & white film only now.  I still bulk load as I’m working down film I bought quite a while ago. 

No scanning.  Why scan as I can capture with digital cameras? Film is film and, to my way of thinking, film is meant to be printed with an analog darkroom. 

When I had my business, I would carry a cooler divided up into various parts each with a different type of film.  When I went completely digital in 2004 what a relief! My process stage went from the darkroom to an iMac.

 

Edited by Bill Clark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The number of rolls is increasing since I sold of my digital stuff except the Monochrom I. Up to now, I shoot approx 6 films/months (35mm and 120, mostly b/w 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Bill Clark said:

No scanning.  Why scan as I can capture with digital cameras? Film is film and, to my way of thinking, film is meant to be printed with an analog darkroom. 

 

I do exactly this with my film negatives, but in a very limited amount compared to the images I scan. Why - because that's the only way to show the taken film photo to a greater audience which a single print will rarely get. There is some loss when digitizing film, but I find it marginal. It is still different especially in B&W compared to a photo from a digital camera. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Enough film in a year for the developing and scanning costs to pay for an M10 and a new lens ..... but in this day and my age rational is not the driving force. To your original point, though, when I go out with my digital and film cameras, I shoot many more digital .... it is free....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, sblitz said:

Enough film in a year for the developing and scanning costs to pay for an M10 and a new lens ..... but in this day and my age rational is not the driving force. To your original point, though, when I go out with my digital and film cameras, I shoot many more digital .... it is free....

This is why when I want to shoot film, I leave digital behind. Yes, film cost is not rationally justifiable, but I love the variety of different films. Digital becomes monotonous in comparison.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/17/2018 at 11:39 PM, jmahto said:

This is why when I want to shoot film, I leave digital behind. Yes, film cost is not rationally justifiable, but I love the variety of different films. Digital becomes monotonous in comparison.

+1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's 20, December. I'm not going to make a hundred. Worse, I'm less happy with them. But "1, January, 2019" is an excellent albeit phony temporal landmark at which to begin trying to see deeper. I suppose Now is an even better one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In 2018

33 rolls of 35mm film in 24 different cameras (mostly Leica), plus a few rolls of 120 film and some 5x4 and 5x7 sheet film.

mostly FP4, sheet film Adox CHS100.

Edited by Pyrogallol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • avarage of 52 films 36 exposures 
  • Ilford FP4+ & Ilford HP5+ only 
  • self development & self wet printing
  • I don't shoot digital
Edited by Paul Verrips

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/21/2018 at 2:31 PM, pico said:

Can we measure by square inches of film? :)

 

The digital equivalent will be storage bytes of all pics taken. Why not? :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue., Read more about our Privacy Policy