DwF Posted December 20, 2019 Share #101 Posted December 20, 2019 Advertisement (gone after registration) Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! A couple of images made with the Monochrom (MM) and Zeiss 50mm f 1.5 C Sonnar. David 11 Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! A couple of images made with the Monochrom (MM) and Zeiss 50mm f 1.5 C Sonnar. David ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/291595-zeiss-c-sonnar-5015-images/?do=findComment&comment=3876368'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted December 20, 2019 Posted December 20, 2019 Hi DwF, Take a look here Zeiss C Sonnar 50/1.5 Images. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Ray Vonn Posted December 20, 2019 Share #102 Posted December 20, 2019 Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Untitled by Otim, on Flickr Melbourne - Architecture - December 2019 by Otim, on Flickr 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Untitled by Otim, on Flickr Melbourne - Architecture - December 2019 by Otim, on Flickr ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/291595-zeiss-c-sonnar-5015-images/?do=findComment&comment=3876461'>More sharing options...
Rollin Posted December 20, 2019 Author Share #103 Posted December 20, 2019 Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! M10 f/2ish 1/90 ISO 5,000 DNG/LR no NR M10 f/2ish 1/90 ISO 8,000 DNG/LR no NR 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! M10 f/2ish 1/90 ISO 5,000 DNG/LR no NR M10 f/2ish 1/90 ISO 8,000 DNG/LR no NR ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/291595-zeiss-c-sonnar-5015-images/?do=findComment&comment=3876562'>More sharing options...
Rollin Posted December 20, 2019 Author Share #104 Posted December 20, 2019 Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! M10 f/2ish 1/90 ISO 4,000 DNG/LR no NR 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! M10 f/2ish 1/90 ISO 4,000 DNG/LR no NR ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/291595-zeiss-c-sonnar-5015-images/?do=findComment&comment=3876563'>More sharing options...
Archiver Posted December 23, 2019 Share #105 Posted December 23, 2019 On 12/19/2019 at 3:44 PM, farnz said: There's something odd going on with one of the 'bokeh balls' in the final picture ("Signing in") where a bokeh ball has intruded in front of the top of her nose whereas the rest look to be much further back. Optical illusion? Pete. Yes, I could never quite work out how that happened. I've never seen this in any other photo I've taken, nor indeed in any taken by others. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
otto.f Posted December 23, 2019 Share #106 Posted December 23, 2019 (edited) 40 minutes ago, Archiver said: Yes, I could never quite work out how that happened. I've never seen this in any other photo I've taken, nor indeed in any taken by others. What was the shutter time? Wild theory: the bokeh ball needs shorter exposure to be seen as it is shown on the image. If she moves a little forward during an exposure of let’s say at 1/60, her movement is slowly enough to not get movement blur, but then the ball is already registered at say 1/250 within the 1/60. And her nose is then overlighted Edited December 23, 2019 by otto.f 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephengv Posted December 25, 2019 Share #107 Posted December 25, 2019 Advertisement (gone after registration) Is this lens worth it? Despite owning a 50 summicron Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bags27 Posted December 25, 2019 Share #108 Posted December 25, 2019 1 minute ago, stephengv said: Is this lens worth it? Despite owning a 50 summicron it's often available nicely used for around $700 on ebay. You gain a stop and it's a very different draw. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephengv Posted December 25, 2019 Share #109 Posted December 25, 2019 Is the bokeh and rendering of this lens really different from other lenses? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
farnz Posted December 25, 2019 Share #110 Posted December 25, 2019 32 minutes ago, stephengv said: Is the bokeh and rendering of this lens really different from other lenses? It has the classic Sonnar rendering and bokeh but with colours and sharpness enhanced by modern manufacturing techniques and coatings. If you mean "Is the bokeh and rendering of this lens really different from all other lenses?" then possibly not but it certainly is different from some other lens designs, for example, Anastigmat, Double Gauss, Ernostar, Biotar, Triotar, Biogon, Tessar, and Planar lens designs. Also different from earlier Sonnar lenses. Pete. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adan Posted December 26, 2019 Share #111 Posted December 26, 2019 On 12/18/2019 at 9:44 PM, farnz said: There's something odd going on with one of the 'bokeh balls' in the final picture ("Signing in") where a bokeh ball has intruded in front of the top of her nose whereas the rest look to be much further back. Optical illusion? Pete. I put this down to an old lens design full of aberrations, combined with modern, contrasty coatings. My 35 f/1.4 Nokton C/V does something similar (and comes from the same factory ). Here's the only example I have at the moment (other pictures where I saw it were not saved, for other creative reasons). Basically, you get a hard-edged, bright-ring "bokeh-ball" in the background, that eats into an edge in the foreground. In this case the background spotlights through the fuzzy building column (top right). The intense light burns through the more neutral foreground edge. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 2 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/291595-zeiss-c-sonnar-5015-images/?do=findComment&comment=3879630'>More sharing options...
stephengv Posted January 7, 2020 Share #112 Posted January 7, 2020 (edited) Trying out the legendary sonnar: Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Edited January 7, 2020 by stephengv 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/291595-zeiss-c-sonnar-5015-images/?do=findComment&comment=3886581'>More sharing options...
stephengv Posted January 7, 2020 Share #113 Posted January 7, 2020 Trying out the sonnar 50 1.5: Mine arrive calibrated at 1.5, so I have to adjust for back focus when shooting anything above 1.5. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 9 Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/291595-zeiss-c-sonnar-5015-images/?do=findComment&comment=3886681'>More sharing options...
grick Posted January 7, 2020 Share #114 Posted January 7, 2020 3 hours ago, stephengv said: Mine arrive calibrated at 1.5, so I have to adjust for back focus when shooting anything above 1.5. Did it come that way, or did you have it calibrated like that after purchase? Greg Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephengv Posted January 7, 2020 Share #115 Posted January 7, 2020 3 hours ago, grick said: Did it come that way, or did you have it calibrated like that after purchase? Greg It came that way. I just have to adjust focus when using lower apertures. Hence, when the image in the RF patch match, I just have to twist the focusing tab a little clockwise to compensate in higher apertures Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephengv Posted January 7, 2020 Share #116 Posted January 7, 2020 another shot: Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/291595-zeiss-c-sonnar-5015-images/?do=findComment&comment=3886937'>More sharing options...
otto.f Posted January 7, 2020 Share #117 Posted January 7, 2020 8 hours ago, stephengv said: Trying out the sonnar 50 1.5: Great bokeh indeed, very Zeissy. The colors are bit M10-ish or am I mistaken here? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephengv Posted January 8, 2020 Share #118 Posted January 8, 2020 9 hours ago, otto.f said: Great bokeh indeed, very Zeissy. The colors are bit M10-ish or am I mistaken here? It was shot on a M 240 ☺️ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
otto.f Posted January 8, 2020 Share #119 Posted January 8, 2020 Not much difference between them Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberti Posted January 11, 2020 Share #120 Posted January 11, 2020 (edited) On 1/7/2020 at 10:05 AM, stephengv said: Trying out the sonnar 50 1.5: Mine arrive calibrated at 1.5, so I have to adjust for back focus when shooting anything above 1.5. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Stephen, well, looking at this performance, then I prefer the lens calibrated at f:1.5 ! When calibrated as such, is the lens in focus at say 2 and 5 meteres and f:1.5 too? Edited January 11, 2020 by Alberti Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.