LexS Posted November 30, 2018 Share #21 Posted November 30, 2018 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) @ramarren: I have LTR6.4 perpetual. LeicaQ, date from Factory 07 november 2018 (!), arrival in shop 13 november 2018, picked up that day, delivered with Firmware 3: I don't see any difference between embedded and Adobe. I had Nikon and Canon cameras before. What I did in the past (before the Q) was: running the all photos through the adobe DNG converter, to avoid "manipulating" through the embedded. Maybe you should try that for some photos to see whether there is a difference (or maybe I should do that again😉). Edited November 30, 2018 by LexS Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 30, 2018 Posted November 30, 2018 Hi LexS, Take a look here Lightroom and the Q. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Dave H Posted March 13, 2019 Share #22 Posted March 13, 2019 On 11/5/2018 at 10:55 AM, Alex U. said: I think that when you use Lightroom Classic in a proper way with its intensded Workflow then one can not just say that you do not like the monthly fee and that one could just switch to something else. Just an. example: I used Apple‘s Aperture for many years and unfortunately I had to go to something else as Apple discontinued their Software. The Data Management System included in LR (Database, Keywords, GPS plus plus plus) can not be just moved to something else and I suffered a lot when I had to give up Aperture. ALL my images were NOT processed any more etc. etc. You can easily say that you will change the Software and then you change again and the again, from LR to C1 to something else to something else . . means that you do not properly use these tools or just use them to quickly process a DNG and then export the JPG and delete the RAW. That kind of „workflow“ I hear again and again. But I think that this is the complete wrong way of using LR. But if I understand well it is about thre. Q here 😇 Hi Alex, I am new to this site and have just ordered a Q2 and noticed you were an Aperture user or used to be, did you ever process DNG files with Aperture? I am still using Aperture and didn't need to change as my RAW files from my Canon 5D 3 can still be processed. I am hoping that DNG files which don't need a new profile every time you upgrade a camera will be compatible with Aperture. I suppose I will have to submit to the inevitable one day, but not yet. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted March 13, 2019 Share #23 Posted March 13, 2019 Aperture has been discontinued for years. I very much doubt that it supports recent cameras. Try ON1, Affinity or other modern post processing programs. They are miles better than Aperture and quite affordable. Aperture was fine in its time, but it really doesn't make sense to buy a camera of the level of the Q2 and process your files in completely obsolete software. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M11 for me Posted March 13, 2019 Share #24 Posted March 13, 2019 vor 47 Minuten schrieb Dave H: Hi Alex, I am new to this site and have just ordered a Q2 and noticed you were an Aperture user or used to be, did you ever process DNG files with Aperture? I am still using Aperture and didn't need to change as my RAW files from my Canon 5D 3 can still be processed. I am hoping that DNG files which don't need a new profile every time you upgrade a camera will be compatible with Aperture. I suppose I will have to submit to the inevitable one day, but not yet. See jaapv. I agree with him. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exodies Posted March 14, 2019 Share #25 Posted March 14, 2019 Isn’t the raw processing on Mac a part of the OS not the Apple apps? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted March 14, 2019 Share #26 Posted March 14, 2019 1 hour ago, Exodies said: Isn’t the raw processing on Mac a part of the OS not the Apple apps? Yes. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
prk60091 Posted April 19, 2019 Share #27 Posted April 19, 2019 Advertisement (gone after registration) On 3/13/2019 at 9:13 PM, jaapv said: Aperture has been discontinued for years. I very much doubt that it supports recent cameras. Try ON1, Affinity or other modern post processing programs. They are miles better than Aperture and quite affordable. Aperture was fine in its time, but it really doesn't make sense to buy a camera of the level of the Q2 and process your files in completely obsolete software. just came across this thread.. aperture works on my 2015 mbp and works with my Q (classic)== i dont use it much but it is there and still works Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exodies Posted April 20, 2019 Share #28 Posted April 20, 2019 (edited) Repeating myself. Edited April 20, 2019 by Exodies Repetition, repetition, repetition. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted April 21, 2019 Share #29 Posted April 21, 2019 On 4/19/2019 at 7:47 PM, prk60091 said: just came across this thread.. aperture works on my 2015 mbp and works with my Q (classic)== i dont use it much but it is there and still works Probably because of the reason Exodies gave. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
prk60091 Posted April 30, 2019 Share #30 Posted April 30, 2019 aperture will no longer work on your mac beyond mojave Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted April 30, 2019 Share #31 Posted April 30, 2019 No great loss. It handled moiré rather badly and was always behind C1 (and LR/PS) in colour rendering. Compared to present-day post-processing programs not an attractive choice. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.