Jump to content

M240 and elmar 135 4.0 (1961)


tjh1023

Recommended Posts

Your photos certainly demonstrate what a good lens it is. Did you focus using the rangefinder?  I find it difficult with my 135mm Tele Elmar but get excellent results using live view with the EVF. It is possible that my lens would benefit from calibration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did focus using the range finder, I did use a 1.25x magnifying eye piece. It does make it easier to focus. I did get some wind just as I took the f22 shot, so a little movement. I am very happy at iso 2000 they look very nice. I didn’t do a thing to them other than crop and make the large photo a little small for the web otherwise sooc jpeg. I just switch to the range finder and Leica about 7 months ago. I couldn’t be happier, a definit higher price for the equipment but well worth it in my opinion. I believe it makes you more integrated in each photo you take. 

Edited by tjh1023
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the information. You did well with the rangefinder focusing. The magnifying eye piece is a good idea. I have been using Leica M cameras since I bought a second hand M2 in the 1970s. My M240 has been neglected a bit lately in favour of my new toy, a Leica CL but I still keep returning to my rangefinder.

Quote

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Leica M240 and Tele-Elmar 135 is incredible! You can get very distinctive images. You might feel that you are a painter rather than a photographer, it is that good. It has a unique OOF rendering. The only drawback is the minimum f stop! One stop faster this lens would be marvel.

 

You can see my other 135 Tele-Elmar photographs I uploaded to my account on 500px: 

https://500px.com/metintext

 

Leica M240+Tele-Elmar 135mm f4 @4

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Here is my share, shot with the Leica M 240 and Tele-Elmar 4/135 1960s: 

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have both 135 lenses, Elmar (1960) and Tele-Elmar (1965+).  Tbh I don't find a significant difference in IQ, but I suppose if I pixel-peeped and looked hard enough I would find one.  The Elmar is physically longer but at the same time, lighter, AND it has a tripod attachment. The T-E lens head comes off for use with a short focus mount, thus rendering it useful on a DSLR; however this isn't necessary with mirrorless cameras.  Interestingly (and probably due entirely to pure luck with sample variation) my Elmar was spot-on with rangefinder focusing on digital M's, whereas my T-E required major surgery.  Image-wise, if all is in proper fettle, both lenses are capable of producing stunning results.  In fact I had an APO-Telyt for a while and sold it because the older and cheaper versions gave such splendid accounts of themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another shot with the M 240 and Elmar (with slight cropping)

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

At F9.5: 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shot this today with a Lee Big Stopper: 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, sblutter said:

Wish mine was that sharp.  Probably operator fault 😣

I assume you are using the rangefinder to focus. I have found it difficult to get sharp focus with my M240 using the rangefinder (which is fine with my other M lenses) but is very sharp when used with Live view and the EVF. I suspect that the lens might benefit from re calibration but as I now use it mainly with the CL I have not felt the need to go the the trouble and expense of sending the lens off for service. Have you tried using the lens on a camera with EVF?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another shot with a 10 Stop Lee Big Stopper and 0.9 Grad ND: 

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...