Jump to content
Hlarocca

24mm Lux w/ SL- purple center spot issue

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hello everybody, I’m fairly new still to photography as a hobby, but am an avid Leica SL shooter. I switch between seven different Leica SL and M lenses on my SL. But I’m hoping perhaps SOMEONE can help me figure out why my SL/ 24mm Lux pics are getting purple spots in the center of the photographs. This doesn’t happen with any of my other lenses on the SL. Only with the 24mm LUX, and I actually don’t recall this being an issue when I first bought the 24mm. It seems to be something that only developed after about 4-6 months of owning the lens. Could it need a proper cleaning? It appears clean to the naked eye.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you show the picture?

 

You don't say under what conditions you shoot Summilux 24mm and what other lens you use. 

 

It may be so called purple fringing, it appears with fast lenses when shot at maximum aperture with strong highlights in the picture.  If that is the case it is completely normal and it can be easily fixed in post processing software.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve had to compress this photo all the way down to 500kb to upload it, it you can still see the purple-ish blue-ish spot above the kayakers. I don’t believe this is vignetting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The apartere Settings are not extreme, not stopped all the way down or up, but basically anywhere between 4-8 it happens. I can control it somewhat by the direction of the camera, but it’s usually a very small window in which it does not appear. In. Ist directions it is visible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is another example. You can see the purplish spot in almost the exact center. I’ve cropped this pic to help get it down to 500kb, but the spot is always very close to the center.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I use 8 different Leica lenses, in the M line- the 24 LUX, 35 Lux, 50 Noc, 75 Lux, 28 Summaron, in the SL line a 50 Lux, 24-90 Vario and 90-280 Vario. This only happens with the 24 Lux. I can’t replicate it with any of the other lenses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say that 90% + of the shots have the anomaly. The pic is breaking down due to the compression to get it to 500kb. I’ll crop it more later when I’m in the office. Thanks everyone for your comments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Something's also going on with the background in the pictures you posted...

How were they compressed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of these pics were taken at Glacier national park during the fires last month, so the sky is very smoky/hazy.  Here are some links to these pics in Dropbox, these are jpg samples, I'm on the road and don't have access at the moment to the DNG files.

 

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/rhao27xdodr93l5/AABATzRDcOGm-HuEWM_tw4hWa?dl=0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like a blue version of the 50/2 apo's CVF (central veiling flare). Did you shoot your pics at f/16 of f/11?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiarocca,

 

My guess is that the purple spot is light entering through the lens, reflecting off the SL's sensor cover glass onto the rear lens element and back onto the sensor where it's recorded along with the rest of the picture.  It's coloured purple because it reflecting off the wrong side of the lens coating.  If the 24/2.4 Summilux's rear element is concave that would explain the small size of the spot because the concave shape will diminish the reflected size onto the sensor.

 

This is only a guess but it seems reasonable to me.

 

I haven't had the same with any of the M and R lenses I use with my SL.

 

Pete.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, 24 Summilux has a concave rear element. 75 Summicron can do the same thing, and sometimes the 28 Summicron (less tightly focused, since it is the second-to-last element in the 28 that is concave).

 

Whether it shows up in any given picture depends on the picture composition - it'll show more when the center of the picture is a dark tone (i.e dark green water or trees). One can shoot 1000 pictures of sand or sky or medium-gray stuff and not see it - but project purple onto the contrasting/complementary color of dark green and it stands out like a spotlight.

 

It'll also vary with the exact curvature or "focal length" of the concave surface, and how far that is from the sensor. The various 35 ASPH lenses also have a concave rear element, but don't seem as prone to the central bright spot effect.

 

The light gets the purple coloring from the lens coating - but not because it is "the wrong side" of the coating (no such thing). The coating is intended to (and does) eliminate reflections of all wavelengths except purple, as designed, but the curved shape of the glass itself focuses all the purple into one place, producing the purple dot.

 

It is just Leica's luck that, having discovered a really cool new tool for designing great lenses (a concave element on the back, dating to the 1990 35mm Aspherical), along comes digital with a nice shiny sensor to bounce the picture back to the lens, which then bounces it (refocused) back to the sensor again.

Edited by adan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I referred to it as 'the wrong side of the coating' because I vaguely presumed the coating works in the same way as interference (dichroic) filters absorbing some visible wavelengths in the intended direction, which would reflect them in the other - similar to the way that UV/IR filters work with the M8. Mea culpa.

 

Pete.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By calidre
      I currently have an MP (240) and a 35 summilux.  I was at the leica store today and the employee mentioned when I decide to upgrade my camera I should look at the M10 or SL.  He then said the SL was probably best because of cost and proceeded to show me a sample of the SL with 35 lux (with adapter) The focusing was great to me but did feel bulky. 
      My question is - If I'm really just going to use it with my M lens does it make sense to go SL route?  I know it would be alot cheaper; but not sure on performance difference etc.
      Apologies if this was asked previously in another post and thank you for any response.
    • By snapshot1
      I’m using my SL with a 90mm lens and a studio strobe setup to photograph some still life’s.  As I need a f16 aperture I cannot see through the view finder as its so dark. Is there a setting for a bright view finder that will then stop down as the strobe is fired?  Cheers Stephen 
    • By Tom1234
      For Using Leica's Historical line of Manual Focus Leica-M Lenses
      are the Leica SL, SL2, AND Nikon Z6, Z7, Bodies Essentially Equivalents?  
      Same Ease Of Use?  
      Same Easy focusing?
      Ease of Carry?
    • By chris_tribble
      I never thought I'd be asking this question, but when I look back at the use I've been getting out of my kit over the last 6 months, it feels like one I need to address.
      I now have SL2 + 24-90 / 90-280 + Sigma 45 + Voigtlander 15 v3.  This feels like a remarkably competent system for the kind of work that I can do during the pandemic.  No theatre, no concerts, no international documentart commissions ☹️
      I also have to M10 bodies + Summicron 28 asph / 35 asph / Summilux 50 / Summarit 70 / Macro-Elmar 90 and Apo-Telyt 135.  
      If you'd asked me a year ago, I'd have said that if I only had one system, it would be the M.  A bit of me still feels that way.  I love the images, the size and weight, the discreetness.  But when I consider what I'm using, I find that the SL2 + 24-90 is the one that comes out in the wind and rain.  I love the range of focal lengths it offers, I love the IQ.  OK - I'm not happy with battery life, and I'd be happier with a couple of interface changes (especially Exposure Lock assignable to a button rather than only to the joystick), but these aren't deal breakers.
      Is a life without an M camera in it imaginable?  For the better part of 30 years, it wouldn't have been.  Now, I'm not so sure...
      Anyone else with these thoughts?  Has anyone converted completely? How does it feel?
       
       
    • By tom0511
      Aufgrund Umstieg auf SL2 biete ich hier an:
      Leica SL Gehäuse
      sehr guter Zustand, nur privat und sehr wenig genutzt Es war von Anfang an ein Displayschutzfolie auf dem Display mit allem Originalzubehör und Originalverpackung gekauft im deutschen Fachhandel (Fotogena, Worms) Die Kamera kann auch bei mir in Bensheim nach Absprache gerne besichtigt werden. Fragen bitte gerne stellen.
      Am liebsten wäre mir Abholung gegen Barzahlung. Versand bei Vorkasse wäre auch möglich. 
      Bei Paypal müssten wir über die Gebühren reden.
      Wer nicht die 47MP der SL2 braucht, kommt hier zu einem sehr günstigen Preis den Einstieg in das SL System. Die Flexibilität - SL Objektive, M-Objektive, Voigtländer, Nikon etc., der tolle Sucher und die Leica Bildqualität und Bedienphilosophie machen für mich die SL/SL2 zu einer der universellsten Kameras, die man heute kaufen kann.
×
×
  • Create New...