Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Dear All

 

I wonder if anyone can give me some advice or help.

We were burgled last week from north west London and all of my precious cameras have been taken.

I don't have the reference numbers for the whole stash, but what was taken included

 
an M2, son-1085967 with a 40mm/ f2 Summicron lens in a brown leather case
 
an M8 body, fabrication number 3196666, VK number 10702
 
an M9 body body number 0384,with 35mm/ 2.8 summaron lens , son-2081257
 
There was also a 50mm/ f2 Summicron
and a 90mm / f28 Elmarit
 
as well as a Hasselblad 500C/M with an f/2.8 80mm and a f/3.5 100mm lens
 
and my old Nikon FM2 with a 24 mm, a 35mm, a 50mm and an 80mm lens
 
and a Canon 5D mk 2 body
 
a Polaroid SX-70
 
an old battered Mamiya 645 in a metal case
 
I'm devastated, not least by the M2/ 35mm  which was the first Leica I bought, and which after a particularly terrible time working in DRC was the only thing that was evacuated with me.
 
I wonder if anyone has been through the same devastating experience and can offer any advice? The police have done forensics/opened a case but is that all I can do?
 
I’d be hugely thankful for any help/ lead in this
 
All best
 
Miriam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for your loss. However, as the police appear to be active, you stand at least a chance of recovering the M2.  Such a camera can only be sold through eBay, Craigslist or similar, or through a specialized dealer. Notify the dealers, check the auction sites daily and let the police know if you find it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Miriam, that is terrible news. I do hope some equipment is recovered.

 

Before contacting Leica, try to retrieve more digital camera body numbers by studying recorded metadata via your image processing software. Also search for any repair or servicing receipts you may have kept in the past.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear, Miriam, and hope you recover items via actions taken and efforts suggested. Beyond that, I hope that you have insurance (preferably itemized, but at least through home contents) to compensate for any lost gear and that you notify your insurance company.

 

This of course won’t replace important personal sentiments, but can at least assist financially. I’m always doubly troubled when I hear these type reports and find that there isn’t (itemized) insurance, which can often be relatively inexpensive.

 

But of course I hope you recover items without need to resort to insurance, especially the M2 and 35mm lens.... as suggested, get info to Leica, notify local dealers, and search ads. And maybe post this on other forums.

 

Jeff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would do as Jaap has already suggested and send a list of all items to Leica HQ as well as to all the London dealers (there's not that many to cover) and check ebay. Digital Leica's have to go back to Wetzlar for any repairs/service so those will probably turn up at some point in the future.

 

However, assuming you had insurance, and they're accepting a claim, remember that your cameras are now their property.

 

Hope you find some at least.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

Miriam, that is terrible news. I do hope some equipment is recovered.

Before contacting Leica, try to retrieve more digital camera body numbers by studying recorded metadata via your image processing software. Also search for any repair or servicing receipts you may have kept in the past.

This is where the Leica members area in the Leica www is useful.

Leica owners are able to list each piece they own inc serial number. Even possible to record date bought,where from,and receipt number. The hardest part is remembering to keep it up to date.All the info that is required and a couple of clicks and the info can be with anyone who needs it in seconds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

However, assuming you had insurance, and they're accepting a claim, remember that your cameras are now their property.

 

Companies, policies and circumstances vary. I insure my photograph collection (same company that covers my camera gear) and one print worth five figures dollar value was damaged during a house move. The company paid fully insured value and told me I was free to keep the print, even if I were to sell it for additional money later on. They didn’t want to mess with it and considered it small potatoes in their insured portfolio. But, yes, it’s up to the company and its rep to decide.

 

Jeff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a very good argument for using the free facility Leica provide to list all your equipment in the Members' Area, with all serial numbers and any additional data you want to provide. I am just in the middle of changing my UK homeowners insurance after 20 claim free years, my current insurers wanted another 10% hike after a 9% hike last year. I printed my Leica equipment list off as a PDF document, with all the serial numbers from my list on the Leica-Camera.com members' area. The two potential insurers I am talking to, thought the Leica equipment list with the serial numbers, was brilliant. 

 

Leica used to have a stolen equipment register but I think that has gone. My Digilux 1 was on the list, although admittedly I was not terribly sad over its theft - my least liked Leica over the last 60 years as a user. 

 

Wilson

Edited by wlaidlaw

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Andrk
      Hi guys, 
      I am sure this topic is covered over and over again, but I can't help starting a new thread to help me out in a very difficult decision. It feels like a very difficult decision anyway. 
      Some background: I have been photographing for the past 15 years, and for a few of those professionally. I have been a strong Nikon fan throughout (sorry for swearing in the church), but have also owned and used a lot of film cameras, such as Mamiya, Hasselblad 2000FCW, Canon and Nikon 35mm film cameras. I would say i am a fairly decent photographer with, maybe, a bigger passion and lust than talent. :)
      Two years ago soon my son was born, and I just didn't bring the big cameras with me any longer, and I missed capturing those moments. I stopped all professional photography to make time for family and my day job. I sold all my other cameras, DSLRs and film alike to buy a new, smaller, more handy one. That I actually would bring with me everywhere and take photos. I never bought one, and now I miss I so much. So I started the hunt for the best camera for ME. 
      I have been googling, foruming all across, and I just don't know how to drill it down any further and decide on the actual camera to buy. One thing I do know is that it is going to be a Leica. I just love Leicas philosophy, the picture quality, the "to the roots" thing, and I have decided once and for all that now is the time for me to finally own a Leica. 
      I also know that I am on a budget. Coming in at a total of 2000 USD would be ideal - but if course, Leica is not cheap and there are many factors here. So anywhere between 1000-3000 USD is something I look at. 
      For that money you could buy either a Leica CL kit brand new, Leica TL2 brand new, a used Leica Q, used Leica M9. 
      I am not a rangefinder guy really, but I really like the concept. However, I will use the camera for many different scenarios such as travel photo, family photo, art works that I do, and just general hobby/art photography. 
      I don't do any studio work any longer, so that I don't need, I don't do street photography in that sense, and I don't to long tele situation photography like concerts or sports. So basically, I do everyday photography and would like my photos to be nice to have, maybe frame them, and if I find time again start taking art work photos again. But let's focus on travel, everyday life typ photo. 
      Now - what do you guys think? Where should I place my bets? I guess many of you have tried many of the cameras - which one do you believe I will be happier with?
      Thank you so much! I appreciate all and any input!
       
       
    • By raxnitz
      Hi,
      I wonder if others had the same problem: I have a 2nd SF 24D that I use regularly with my M3 on A setting, no problem. Now, recently I obtained an M9 and tried out the 24D with it but it instantly switches to a flashing ISO 3200 and an LGN of 45. This cannot be changed by the +/- buttons, nor anything else (such as f-stop). This occurs in A and M setting (TTL/GCN I can forget - it doesn’t work at all with the M9 but reminds me to switch to A). 
       
      The odd thing is that it resets once off the M9 and then the settings can be used just as normal. I tried it also on a friend’s D-Lux 5 and his ancient Digilux 2 - the former works fine on A,  the latter produces the same problems as with the M9. 
       
      I usually am fine working on A or M since I normally use the 24D as a filler flash but even that doesn’t work with the M9 under these circumstances. 
       
      Ideas?
      Thanks very much
      raxnitz
    • By rpsawin
      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By strangeboy
      Hello.
      I'm interested in hearing from anyone whose made the move from an M9/M-E to a 262.
      How are you feeling about your decision?
      I've recently replaced the sensor in my M-E, which included a full CLA from Leica, NJ. It feels like a new camera, but I'm also reminded of the only gripe I've ever really had about it: Limited ISO performance. I max out at 1200, but even that can turn a Summer afternoon into a snowy day in B/W. I'd love to (when necessary) shoot between 1600 & 3200 without the resulting photograph becoming an exploration in Pointillism.
      In addition, weather sealing and the larger sensor seem like a plus.
      Let the CCD vs CMOS debate begin!
      So good people...
      What say you?
      Thanx!
    • By Herr Barnack
      Here is an interesting article about the M8, along with some photographs that show the camera's capabilities, if you are willing to work within its limitations of the 160-2500 ISO range: 
      https://www.35mmc.com/26/06/2020/leica-m8-finally-falling-in-love/
      At the risk of stating the obvious, with any Digital M camera ISO appears to be a very significant factor with regard to image quality.  I tend to work with ISOs of around 10-15% of maximum on my digital Leicas (Q2 and M-P 240) in the interest of image quality. 
      I/Q does not always seem to be a linear proposition, though.  With my M-P 240, I have made images at ISO 1600 and even 3200 that still result in exhibit quality prints at 16x24 inches, depending on subject, lighting, shutter speed and probably a whole kettle full of other intangible factors.   
      The M8 was a "gateway drug" for this photographer, as he has decided to upgrade to an M10.  He took the affordable bait and now he is hooked!  😄
×
×
  • Create New...