Jump to content

The Leica Forum uses cookies. Read the privacy statement for more info. To remove this message, please click the button to the right:    OK, understood.

Photo
- - - - -

Extended warranty for used lens?


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 lmak

lmak

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts

Posted 12 July 2018 - 18:25

Advertisement (Gone after free registration)
Hi, just got a 2008 Summicron 90/2 Asph/apo that looks pretty new. Some minor scuffs on the front end of the lens hood is all I can see. Local shop offered a 2 year warranty extension on manufactured defect from Mack. Doesn’t cost too much but curious if anybody thinks it is worth it at this point. Doesn’t cover accidental damage. Kind of thinking at 10 years and Leica build quality it’s not really rational to get. Thanks!

#2 JAC

JAC

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 12 posts
  • City / Ort:California

Posted 12 July 2018 - 21:44

Maybe I'm lucky but I've never had a problem with a lens of any brand. 



#3 Jeff S

Jeff S

    Erfahrener Benutzer

  • Members
  • 12,209 posts

Posted 12 July 2018 - 22:16

Money better spent IMO on personal insurance that covers loss or damage for all your gear.

Jeff
  • lmak said thank you to this

#4 Peter Kilmister

Peter Kilmister

    Member

  • Premium Member
  • 904 posts
  • LocationThe ancient Kingdom of Sussex, UK

Posted 12 July 2018 - 23:02

There is so little that can go wrong with a lens. My advice is to check it thoroughly and carry on without an extended warranty. Best wishes.


  • lmak said thank you to this

#5 lct

lct

    Ex-Newbie

  • Members
  • 17,009 posts

Posted 13 July 2018 - 05:39

Depends how long is the normal warranty period, if any, and how much the dealer is asking for the warranty extension.



#6 chris_livsey

chris_livsey

    Erfahrener Benutzer

  • Members
  • 2,183 posts

Posted 13 July 2018 - 08:07

 Local shop offered a 2 year warranty extension on manufactured defect from Mack. 

 

So, no manufacturing defect in the first 10 years, what are the chances of one appearing in the next 2? If it covered accidental damage a different case altogether. 

 

The other clue is the low cost, if they sell a lot of this insurance and face few claims then the premium can be low and attract even more sales, looks the case to me. Rarely, vanishingly so but there will be members who have had benefit of course, does insurance work out well for the insured. Like bookmakers few insurance companies go bankrupt, some "winners" many "losers" but always a win on their side of the fence.

 

As a Leica lens, even 12 years down the line, if it genuinely was a "manufacturing" defect I am sure Leica would step up to the mark but by then it's going to be fair wear and tear which is not covered.


  • lmak said thank you to this

#7 LocalHero1953

LocalHero1953

    Photographer

  • Premium Member
  • 4,685 posts
  • LocationCambridge
  • City / Ort:Cambridge

Posted 13 July 2018 - 08:19

It would depend on who would do the repairs. If the repairs are to be done by Leica, then OK, but if it is not specified, then I would be cautious


Paul
=============================
Paul Ashley Photography
Paul Ashley on Instagram

#8 earleygallery

earleygallery

    Ebeneezer Goode

  • Members
  • 16,670 posts
  • LocationLondon
  • City / Ort:Gtr London

Posted 13 July 2018 - 09:22

A lot of those extended warranty insurance policies (because that's what they are) are a con. So many limitations on cover and small print T&C's as to make them basically useless.

 

For example, I bought a used car that came with 6 months warranty! Great. Until you read the small print which says amongst other things that when making a claim you would have to show that the car had been maintained in accordance with the manufacturers service schedules - impossible as the car was an older model with a couple of previous owners and only some of its service history. I told the dealer to keep his warranty and negotiated a lower price instead.


  • Peter Kilmister and lmak said thank you to this

#9 lmak

lmak

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts

Posted 13 July 2018 - 16:01

Appreciate the comments. The insurance is just $40 for a lens up to $5000 in value, which sounds trivial next to the lens price. But I agree, I found myself thinking the 3 year warranty is long expired and short of an accident or theft, a manufacturing defect should have presented itself by now. Functionally it’s amazing - I can read the small print of the royal appointment on my bottle of Laphroig. The whole policy does sound designed to make an easy and enticing point of sale purchase to line the bank accounts of the company...

#10 marcg

marcg

    Erfahrener Benutzer

  • Members
  • 955 posts
  • LocationVirtually everywhere

Posted 13 July 2018 - 18:03

Hi, just got a 2008 Summicron 90/2 Asph/apo that looks pretty new. Some minor scuffs on the front end of the lens hood is all I can see. Local shop offered a 2 year warranty extension on manufactured defect from Mack. Doesn’t cost too much but curious if anybody thinks it is worth it at this point. Doesn’t cover accidental damage. Kind of thinking at 10 years and Leica build quality it’s not really rational to get. Thanks!

 

Where are you in the world?


Dictation software used. Beware homophones!


#11 lct

lct

    Ex-Newbie

  • Members
  • 17,009 posts

Posted 13 July 2018 - 21:20

Do you have a warranty without this extension? 




0 user(s) are reading this topic