Jump to content

Compatibility of a new CL with a SF 24D flash?


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

As the "SF 24D" flash unite was designed for the film Leica cameras before, would it be usable on a new CL digital body?   It is a nice little flash unite for occasionally fill flash use before, but would it be compatible with a new CL?

 

As well would the tiny little flash unit that comes with the D-Lux (109) work with the new CL body?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, but the SF40 is much better.

 

The D-lux one probably not.

 

The SF should be a much bigger (and heavier) unit compared with the SF24D?     If only is for fill-flash usage in case of bright sunlight outdoors taking people photos, do you think the SF24D is enough to term up with the CL?  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I put it on, te camera recognizes the flash, the flash "sees" the aperture, and the shot I took in TTL mode was correctly exposed as far as the SF24 exposes correctly.

However, flash shots from the SF40  simply look better, the SF40 has a tiltable head and takes AA batteries, has an automatic zoom reflector, HSS and a slave function.

In comparison, the SF24 D is obsolete. Nowadays I would only recommend the SF24D for fill flash. In fact, I only used it for fill in the past. For real flash shots I would use the CT 32-7 SCA by Metz.

BTW, when unfolded, the SF40 fits exactly into a vintage Minilux2  leather bag.

 

So the short answer, I guess, is:  Yes, the SF24D is compatible to the CL but not very impressive.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you!    Yes I only use a flash for fill-flash when need, e.g. in bright sunlight of people's photo to reduce the shadows on the face...      Looks then the SF24D could do the job combine with a CL, and the total size, weight of the SF24D should be still a lot less than other newer flashes... make it much easier to bring along, even though often may not use it at all during a trip or session...

 

 

In comparison, the SF24 D is obsolete. Nowadays I would only recommend the SF24D for fill flash. In fact, I only used it for fill in the past. For real flash shots I would use the CT 32-7 SCA by Metz.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

A little off-topic, but I use flash so infrequently and this thread reminded me that I should see if my old Nikon SB-30 will work on the CL (in-flash metering only, no TTL). The sad news is that it doesn't: the shape of the viewfinder ocular interferes with fitting it to the camera.

 

I did check that my ancient RF triggers (Cactus V2 and Cactus V5) do work and trigger the flash nicely with the CL body.

 

I suppose that if I want an on-camera compatible flash unit, I might buy one of the Leica ones and get the TTL capability. Which one would you suggest?

Link to post
Share on other sites

SF40.

 

 

Thanks, that's what I thought. On the other hand, I can find an NOS SF24D for about half the price of that one ... For the amount that I actually need a flash, its limitations may well be fine. I put both on my list to consider. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Metz/Panasonic won't work with the CL. You need the Leica variant.

the all ebay selling are metz 26 af-2 listed as panasonic/olympus/leica,,,this works? not buy if listed only panasonic/olympus? must have 4pins flash foot?3pins only for olympus/panasonic? correct? Edited by leonasj
Link to post
Share on other sites

the all ebay selling are metz 26 af-2 listed as panasonic/olympus/leica,,,this works? not buy if listed only panasonic/olympus? must have 4pins flash foot?3pins only for olympus/panasonic? correct?

 

 

It's for the small point and shoot Leicas which are manufactured by Panasonic. Not for the Q/M/CL/TL/SL/TL2 cameras, which have a different flash protocol. These require the SF26 from Leica.

 

I agree, it's confusing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

+1. Great little flash for this casual user (SF 26 on CL).

I agree. I bought mine when they first were released some years ago. The main drawback is that it is very expensive for such a simple small flash which tilts but does not rotate. The SF40 costs a bit more but is a much more sophisticated and powerful flash and therefor better value. Still pricey as you expect from Leica. If you want a small, light compact fuss free flash for fill in or indoor use on social occasions  with good TTL the SF26 is ideal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...