Jump to content

135 f2.8. - any good ?


rsolomon

Recommended Posts

The APO is technically the better lens, at least at wider apertures. So is the Tele-Elmar-M f/4 (predecessor to the APO).

 

But the f/2.8 (which also comes in M-mount natively, with rangefinder goggles, as well as in R mount, and they were the same optics in either mount, throughout most of their life) is no slouch.

 

I'd rate it as the second-best SLR-mount 135 f/2.8 ever made (after the Zeiss/Contax/Kyocera Sonnar MM 135 f/2.8, and not counting the Nikon/Canon/Zeiss f/2.0 135s, which are a whole different ball game). It is quite sharp, lower contrast than the APO 135-M or the Zeiss/Contax MM, with the family characteristics of the other Walter-Mandler-designed non-APO faster teles (75 Summilux, 90 Summicron, 180 Summicron-R f/2.8 or f/4, 250 f/4 Telyt-R, etc.) to a greater or lesser extent. Cooler color balance, nice bokeh at certain distances, a certain amount of chromatic aberration (color fringes around fine details wide-open).

 

There were two R versions - 1964 design and 1968. The second version is marginally better (clarity and contrast) - but bottom line, is still a 1960s design (even if made in the 1990s).

 

I tried the v.2 R version on a Canon 5D - very nice, but my native M 135 f/4 was even nicer, and weighed less as a package with an M camera, for about the same price - so I stayed with that choice.

Edited by adan
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Apo-M is the technically better lens, no doubt about it (and priced accordingly, though)

However, the Elmarit-R is a Mandler-style, wonderful lens, sharp wide open and great from f/4 on, and at that price tag it's an absolute bargain.

No doubt it's a 60s design... just like other excellent 60s design such as Tele-Elmar-M 135, Summicron-R 50 v1, Summicron-M 50 rigid (v2), Elmarit-R 90 v1, and so on.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

At one time I had the 135/2.8 and used it in various configurations on film bodies and then on my Nikon DSLR. My overall feeling was that its size and weight overshadowed its added f/stop. I didn't have that issue with a Canon 135/2, and the Tele-Elmar 135/4 was such a good performer that I went back to it for my Leica (and much other work). I also tried the 135/3.4 APO, but it was too clinical, and as I recall the head wasn't removable, so I couldn't use it on my Nikon DSLR. As for your situation, I'd say first - determine if it is something you may be carrying for long periods or distances and whether you really need the extra f/stop. If those are issues for you, there are much better choices, IMHO.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an original single cam 135/2.8 R lens c.1965 … used with my Leica T and bought from Ffordes for £95 …

 

https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/276596-leica-t-budget-macro/?hl=lizards&do=findComment&comment=3354182

 

it's a superb lens and the final single lizard image recently won an an exhibition print award.

 

dunk 

Edited by dkCambridgeshire
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I bought one (the R version) yesterday, and while it was a little more than £95 it was still VERY cheap for a Leica lens. I've only used it at the dealer's shop and around the house so far, but from what I've seen it's a splendid lens which I'm going to enjoy a lot. I do also have the Tele-Elmar-M, (also bought for a song, at a recent Photographica fair)  but I bought the new lens for its extra stop for portraits, and as I shall mainly be using it for that purpose at home the considerable weight isn't really an issue. If I want a 135 to take out and about I can still use the excellent T-E-M. 

At f2.8 it definitely gives a more melting background if that's what one wants, apparently without being significantly less sharp than f4 where it matters.

Edited by Musotographer
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

TL on tripood, self-timer 12 s, focus on the red brick building,which is distant 570 m.

135 af f/2.8 – 4.

 

Fernando.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

135/2.8 at 5.6, and 8.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

135/2.8 at 11, and 16.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally, at 22.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...