Jump to content

Too much HDR


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I was wondering what forum members felt about HDR images. Personally I can't stand it. This is one example that popped up on my Facebook feed: 

 

[image removed for copyright reasons]

 

The other sin with this photograph is cliched use of a wide angle lens. 

 

I don't like over HDR'ed images, the pictures no longer look as if someone saw it. IMO it looks artificial, and they all look the same. Opinions? 

Edited by LUF Admin
[Image removed for copyright reasons]
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Opinions? 

 

Yuk! I detest excess HDR but then again I struggle to accept montages, highly manipulated photographic images or photos substantially 'converted' to watercolour simulations or similar to be photographs. Digital 'Art' perhaps, photos no.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Sorry folks, had to remove this image.

 

Please post only image if you have the corresponding rights.

Everything else can cause legal trouble for me - we are running here under German law.

 

Andreas

I think the discussion is clear: (extreme) HDR processing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The need for HDR seems to have waned as sensors have got better with wider DR ...... it was after all just a processing technique to compensate for sensor deficiencies.

 

If used to lift detail out of shadows and avoid blown highlights then I cannot see what the problem is.

 

However ..... the majority of HDR processors and algorithms that do this tend to produce pretty garish results. Almost all tend to create very artificial colours. 

 

The only one I have used that offers good control and produces 'natural' results is Oloneo PhotoEngine..... you would be hard pushed to tell it is an HDR image at all if used well. 

 

If you want a grotty example to criticise .... here's one ....

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

Edited by thighslapper
Link to post
Share on other sites

something a bit less ghastly ..... but this church interior would be impossible to photo otherwise in natural light

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

and something which to my eye doesn't look to unnatural ..... but there again it's all a matter of taste

 

I only use HDR when the alternative image is a dead loss without it ...... and I'm far too lazy to use multiple flash or lighting set-ups .....

 

You are welcome to tear any or all to shreds in the spirit of 'constructive' criticism ..... :p

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by thighslapper
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

<snip>

 

I don't like over HDR'ed images, the pictures no longer look as if someone saw it. IMO it looks artificial, and they all look the same. Opinions? 

There is a perennial question about whether the goal of an image should be to look natural, which presumably means to recreate an impression similar to that experienced by the viewer of the original the scene. If this is the goal but the result looks artificial, then clearly it's a 'fail'. However, there have been many successful images which do not look 'real'...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do some interior photography for realtors and often have to do HDR shots. When shooting a room with a window I will use a three shot bracket.  One exposed for the outside as seen through the window, one exposed for the shadow areas of the room, and one for the room mid-tones. The result is much like thighslapper's last shot above.  With a single shot, exposed for the interior lighting, the windows will be blown out.  To my mind that is far more unnatural looking.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

HDR can be used effectively - I do use it. The problem with many HDR shots is that they are about using HDR, not about producing an image. If a PP technique will deliver an image as envisaged/required that's fine. All too often though HDR images are taken simply to utilise the technique, and its shows.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yuk! I detest excess HDR but then again I struggle to accept montages, highly manipulated photographic images or photos substantially 'converted' to watercolour simulations or similar to be photographs. Digital 'Art' perhaps, photos no.

 

What pgk said.

 

@thighslapper, the #3 image that you posted looks natural; #1 and #2 of the church interior?  Not so much. 

 

Many people in my photography club (150-160 members) have in the past have had a fascination with making HDR imagery.  A few of the resulting prints have looked natural; the majority have been hideously over manipulated.  Bluck!

 

It is natural to have shadows, even dark places in a scene.  Not every nook and cranny of a scene must be illuminated as if its being blasted with the landing lights of an Airbus A380.

Edited by Herr Barnack
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

something a bit less ghastly ..... but this church interior would be impossible to photo otherwise in natural light

 

attachicon.gifL8002164-HDR-2.jpg

Better but still not good. For me the test of HDR (as natural) is very simple. The tonal values across the scene should not mess up natural order (example: direct sunlight scene should have larger tonal value than in shade). They can compress and expand in tonal range but not leave their space in tonal order. Otherwise it looks unnatural to our senses. Something seems off.

 

In this church scene, the tonal value outside window (direct sunlight) is almost same (or overlapping) compared to some parts of interior tonal values (I am eyeballing it but it is easy to check with LR whether I am correct). This seems unnatural.

 

Ming Thein wrote an article long time ago describing how tonal range can be compressed (but not overlapped) for good HDR.

Edited by jmahto
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...