Jump to content
jonatdonuts

chrome-brass versus black aluminium telephoto lenses

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi guys,

 

I'm interested in acquiring a 90mm Elmarit-M for the M10. I will be primarily shooting handheld. 

 

I was wondering if others had found that heavier chrome-brass versions of telephoto lenses helped reduce motion blur in their images, or did it have the opposite (or negligible) effect? 

 

Any insights into the use of telephoto lenses (not necessarily 90mm) would be greatly appreciated. 

 

Thanks in advance!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never tried the chrome version (which weighs 150g more than the black according to Leica's spec sheet) but I have no problems handholding the black version and provided you use a viable shutter speed, motion blur is not a problem. I don't really think that the extra inertia added by 150g is going to make any difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the 90 Elmarit 2.8 and have one in chrome. It is heavy and probably does add some stability to handheld shooting.  BUT...

 

if you are lugging it around all day along with other lenses the weight may have the opposite effect and can be tiring.

 

As a side note: I ordered a 6-Bit bayonet with screw holes (on Ebay from the Chinese dealer who has a goo rep for them) so I could code it and and replace the original bayonet and it never arrived. Something about all the stock being held in US Customs. He did refund the money, however.

 

The lack of coding is not a huge issue to many but I dislike having the wrong EXIF data in Lightroom. The lens shows as a MATE 28-35-50 on my M10 (the minute you turn off the camera and then turn back on, its code reader moves back from the correct Manual setting to Auto and MATE.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Holger1
      Verkaufe ein Elmarit-M 2,8/90 in der seltenen schwarzen Ausführung.
      Das Objektiv ist in einem top Zustand (siehe Fotos)
      Dies ist ein Privatverkauf. I only send within Germany
      www.HolgerDaberkow.de
    • By Hans-Peter
      Objektiv kommt im Karton, der aber nicht nummerngleich ist. Rückdeckel ist dabei. Die Produktionsnummer ist 2914903. Keine Kratzer oder Fungus auf dem Glas.
    • By WanLevia
      Hi to all Leica lovers,
      I'm new to the forum, at least as registered user, and I want to thank you all for all your invisible support you gave me when searching for precious info about Leica. Probably the best resource online on this specific and lovable world.
      I'm interested to test some 35mm prime lenses (no Leica) for my digital M.
      I've heard about great results with:
      Voigtlander 35mm f2.5 Color Skopar Zeiss Biogon C 35mm f2.8 Zeiss Biogon C 35mm f2.0 (someone online affirming it is not sharp as the Zeiss 2.8) I know this is probably an old challenge but I just wanted to follow up it on 2020 , and I'm interested to a new lens.
      Anyone here who want to share its opinion both on digital or analogical is very very welcome.
      Furthermore....is it worth the Zeiss price gap (currently double the price for new)?
      Thanks a lot
      WanLevia
    • By theweijian
      I was listening to an interview between Dr Andreas Kaufmann and Ralph Gibson, and I was intrigued by this statement by Ralph Gibson:
      I am curious if any of you have found that to be the case - that 75mm is "normal" for digital photography.
      See 3:55 in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Yaf8l1quJQ
    • By Al Brown
      Have searched for a while for the ultimate pouch (neoprene, not leather) for my Leica M lenses. Finally found one for the "average" Leica/Zeiss/Hexanon lens. This bag can also be hooked to the belt via the sewn loop, having enough room for a finger to reach for the lens. I cut off the adjacent carabiner as it was useless. Now I can stack two lenses on top of each other (I have 4) in my ONA bag. I am not naming any brands, I am not associated with anyone, just informing anyone that was after such product that this company is in Munich, Germany and on amazon.de. They have even smaller (XXS) bags but they are too tiny for Leica lenses. The proper size they offer for the pouch IMHO was XS (7cm x 8cm). The bags are not the icons of design, nor very beautiful, but they do get the job done.

      PLEASE SHARE YOUR LEICA LENS POUCH EXPERIENCE(S).

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
×
×
  • Create New...