Julian H Posted March 11, 2018 Share #1 Posted March 11, 2018 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hi I am looking for a 90 to complement my M4-2* and 50 collapsible Elmar-M when I go hiking and [modest] climbing. I really like what I see written about the late Elmarit but I fear it is too heavy and too big. I was looking at the Tele-Elmar M but reports of flare and potential optical issues [haze?] put me off. What else compares to the Elmarit and is smaller and lighter and not too expensive? I am open to other brands and wonder about the Apo Lanthar? Cheers, Julian * I will also use it on my M262 but I don't take it hiking / climbing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted March 11, 2018 Posted March 11, 2018 Hi Julian H, Take a look here A lightweight 90. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
LocalHero1953 Posted March 11, 2018 Share #2 Posted March 11, 2018 Hi I am looking for a 90 to complement my M4-2* and 50 collapsible Elmar-M when I go hiking and [modest] climbing. I really like what I see written about the late Elmarit but I fear it is too heavy and too big. I was looking at the Tele-Elmar M but reports of flare and potential optical issues [haze?] put me off. What else compares to the Elmarit and is smaller and lighter and not too expensive? I am open to other brands and wonder about the Apo Lanthar? Cheers, Julian * I will also use it on my M262 but I don't take it hiking / climbing. Macro-Elmar-M 90 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomB_tx Posted March 11, 2018 Share #3 Posted March 11, 2018 The Macro Elmar-M is indeed the smallest and lightest, but fairly expensive. I like the 90 Elmar C, made for the old Leica CL. People warn that focus may not be best on an M body, but mine has been perfect on M6, M9, & M10 as well as my old CL. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdlaing Posted March 11, 2018 Share #4 Posted March 11, 2018 Lanthar is pretty stout in its own right. Macro Elmar 90 is good and as small as you can get. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bertolotti Posted March 11, 2018 Share #5 Posted March 11, 2018 (edited) Macro Elmar is reallythe top... but, given that your camera is a M4-2, for mountain usage I'd go for a fine Elmar collapsible (even in VG conditions, they are no costly) or for a Tele Elmarit V1 (a bit more costly, but a really fine lens... I used mine for years) ; is someway heavy but really VERY compact, and, differently from the collapsible Elmar, has no sort of issue with your digital M. Edited March 11, 2018 by luigi bertolotti Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
earleygallery Posted March 11, 2018 Share #6 Posted March 11, 2018 The 9cm Elmar f4 is very light, very compact and very cheap. Perfomance wise it's good, but get a late coated version with nice clean optics. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adan Posted March 11, 2018 Share #7 Posted March 11, 2018 Advertisement (gone after registration) I've actually used the 90mm APO-Lanthar, mostly in the mount for Canon EOS (same glass) and it is exceptional at rangefinder distances (1 meter - infinity). A bit weak in the close-up range (0.7 meters or so). 260 grams in Leica LTM mount (requires thin adapter for M use) - so only 30g heavier than the Macro-Elmar, and a sturdier mount. http://www.opticallimits.com/sony-alpha-aps-c-lens-tests/553-voigtlander90f35nex 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ko.Fe. Posted March 12, 2018 Share #8 Posted March 12, 2018 (edited) 90 f4 Elmar LTM. 195g + M to LTM adapter. On M-2: Edited March 12, 2018 by Ko.Fe. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckuwajima Posted March 12, 2018 Share #9 Posted March 12, 2018 The “THIN" Tele-Elmarit weights about 226g, without the (necessary) hood. On M4: Leica M4 w/ Tele Elmarit 90mm f/2.8 & IUFOO Hood by Celso Kuwajima, on Flickr 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julian H Posted March 12, 2018 Author Share #10 Posted March 12, 2018 Hi I think the weight and size of the Apo-Lanthar is okay, and it will mostly be used focussed at a distance. Is the 90 Elmar-C [CL lens] and the Rokkor version the Voigtlander's equal, or better? The Macro Elmar is not on the cards for me, although no doubt lovely I really can't spend that sort of money on a lens and then be camping or in shared mountain huts. It might very well be okay but I would worry too much so it would always be on my mind. The thin TE is ideal but I have read about optical issues due to age which really put me off finding a good copy. Julian Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomB_tx Posted March 12, 2018 Share #11 Posted March 12, 2018 I haven't tried the Lanthar, but I've been very impressed with the Elmar-C, especially since I picked it up for well under $300 US, and it looks like new. It can be a true bargain. I also have a 1968 TE version 1 (my first Leica lens in 1968), and a 90 Summarit. The TE spent years stored away after it suddenly would not give a sharp focus plane. Finally got it repaired a few years ago - a rear element had shifted position - and it has been fine since. In fact, all 3 of these give lovely images. But of these the Elmar-C is the smallest and lightest. It used to be my travel kit with a CL and 40 Summicron C. Erwin Puts notes that the Elmar-C has a very similar optical layout to the Macro Elmar, and also seems to be optimized for near distances, so is excellent for portraits and such. Mine came with the leather pouch and original rubber hood,which is still in fine shape after 40+ years. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmahto Posted March 12, 2018 Share #12 Posted March 12, 2018 (edited) Hi I think the weight and size of the Apo-Lanthar is okay, and it will mostly be used focussed at a distance. Is the 90 Elmar-C [CL lens] and the Rokkor version the Voigtlander's equal, or better? The Macro Elmar is not on the cards for me, although no doubt lovely I really can't spend that sort of money on a lens and then be camping or in shared mountain huts. It might very well be okay but I would worry too much so it would always be on my mind. The thin TE is ideal but I have read about optical issues due to age which really put me off finding a good copy. Julian If Macro Elmar is not in the cards (for you) then thin TE is second best option. What optical issues are you talking about? Flare? On a digital with LV you can check for flare before shooting and can control it by moving or using extra shade by hand. On Film you don't have that option for sure. Other issue could be RF alignment. Where your RF works with rest of the lenses but off only with 90mm. In that case it becomes RF alignment issue for the whole set. Edited March 12, 2018 by jmahto Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted March 12, 2018 Share #13 Posted March 12, 2018 Always liked 90mm lenses, i mush have a dozen of them but i have no experience with the Apo Lanthar at all sorry. If f/4 is fast enough for you the very best one is the Macro-Elmar 90/4 but the M-Rokkor 90/4 for Minolta CLE (not CL) is not far from it and is much cheaper. A bargain and a keeper to me. The Elmar-C 90/4 is sharp but no more so than the Rokkor and the latter flares a lot less, especially when strong light sources are just outside the frame. At f/2.8 the smallest and lightest Leica is the Tele-Elmarit "thin" 90/2.8. Great little lens but better choose the German version from 1987 if you can find one as it flares less than the earlier Canadian one as far as my copies are concerned at least. Now it is still a flare prone lens which needs a long hood anyway. The Elmarit 90/2.8 v2 is a better lens in that it flares less but it is significantly more bulky and it has more CA than the Tele-Elmarit. My advice if you need a small 90 in a budget, pick the Rokkor you won't regret it. But again it is the model for Minolta CLE made my Minolta in the eighties, not that for Minolta CL made by Leitz in the seventies. The latter is just a clone to the Elmar-C 90/4 with different filters. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernstk Posted March 12, 2018 Share #14 Posted March 12, 2018 Agree with what lct says above. The Elmar C 90/4 is a great lens. Small, light and inexpensive. Ernst Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rramesh Posted March 13, 2018 Share #15 Posted March 13, 2018 (edited) The most recent Elmarit-M is very good. Great Mandler design. Can be obtained at a bargain in the used market. The built-in hood like the 50 Lux is a nice touch. Edited March 13, 2018 by rramesh Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julian H Posted March 13, 2018 Author Share #16 Posted March 13, 2018 I would without question jump for the late Elmarit if it were smaller and lighter! I have read [perhaps too] much on the www about problematic thin T-E's, degradation between lenses, fungus, flare etc which discourages me buying one. Hi LCT thanks so much for your detailed post. How can I be sure of the later Rokkor? There is one says made by Leitz on the front ring, is that the earlier CL one, and the better Minolta version below? Thanks for your help all, its much appreciated Julian Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted March 13, 2018 Share #17 Posted March 13, 2018 This is it: M-Rokkor 90/4 for Minolta CLE. The M-Rokkor 90/4 for Minolta CL has the same design as the Elmar-C 90/4 and a « MADE BY LEITZ » engraving on the front ring (pic). Happy snaps Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/282629-a-lightweight-90/?do=findComment&comment=3479842'>More sharing options...
Julian H Posted March 15, 2018 Author Share #18 Posted March 15, 2018 Confused. The S/no on your pictured lens is 1976, the Minolta CLE came out in 1980? Surely the Minolta for the CLE looks like my posted photo? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exodies Posted March 15, 2018 Share #19 Posted March 15, 2018 I think a misreading has taken place. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernstk Posted March 15, 2018 Share #20 Posted March 15, 2018 Confused. The S/no on your pictured lens is 1976, the Minolta CLE came out in 1980? Surely the Minolta for the CLE looks like my posted photo? The CL (both Leica and Minolta versions) came out in 1973. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.