Stealth3kpl Posted February 23, 2018 Share #1 Posted February 23, 2018 Advertisement (gone after registration) There are murmurs on the web of a Kodak announcement. Could it be T-Max 3200? Pete 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 Hi Stealth3kpl, Take a look here Kodak T-Max 3200. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
wattsy Posted February 23, 2018 Share #2 Posted February 23, 2018 That seems be the consensus opinion. I think the announcement is later today. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrozenInTime Posted February 23, 2018 Share #3 Posted February 23, 2018 Hope it’s so. Loved TMZ - night shots with black blacks and sharp edged grain. Looked great when optically printed on to fiber paper. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith (M) Posted February 23, 2018 Share #4 Posted February 23, 2018 (edited) Info here! Edited February 23, 2018 by Keith (M) 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wattsy Posted February 23, 2018 Share #5 Posted February 23, 2018 Yep, it's also on Kodak Alaris's website here (you need to scroll down the page). Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/282106-kodak-t-max-3200/?do=findComment&comment=3467210'>More sharing options...
MarkP Posted February 23, 2018 Share #6 Posted February 23, 2018 (edited) Bodes well for the future of film :-) Now they just need to bring back Kodachrome and all will be well with the world :-) Edited February 23, 2018 by MarkP 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsj Posted February 23, 2018 Share #7 Posted February 23, 2018 Advertisement (gone after registration) exciting news. I wonder how it will compare to Delta 3200, especially price wise. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith (M) Posted February 23, 2018 Share #8 Posted February 23, 2018 I see that it is stated as While the nominal film speed of P3200 TMZ is ISO 800, the “P” means it’s designed to be push processed to EI 3200 or higher.. Don't recall being in a position where ISO 3200 was needed, but it will be interesting to see how the results from exposing at ISO 800 & ISO 1600 compare with pushing films such as Tri-X. And of course, the price differential! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin B Posted February 23, 2018 Share #9 Posted February 23, 2018 (edited) That's good news - it is my favorite high ISO film. I still have a few of the old P3200 left in my fridge which delivers outstanding quality with low grain for the speed. Can be nicely used at ISO 1600, 3200 and even 6400. I wonder if the remake of the original P3200 will use the same formula - just thinking on Tri-X which has seen several iterations over the years, and the current film has supposedly not too much in common with its original. A few examples which I shot last year with outdated P3200 - all taken with Leica M3, film developed in Xtol (1:2) Edited February 23, 2018 by Martin B 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikemgb Posted February 23, 2018 Share #10 Posted February 23, 2018 I'm looking forward to trying this. I pushed some Delta 3200 to 6400 last year and wasn't too happy with the results, I'll be happy if TMZ performs better. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin B Posted February 23, 2018 Share #11 Posted February 23, 2018 I'm looking forward to trying this. I pushed some Delta 3200 to 6400 last year and wasn't too happy with the results, I'll be happy if TMZ performs better. I found Delta 3200 horrible even otherwise I really love Ilford films. P3200 performs much better! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrian Lord Posted February 23, 2018 Share #12 Posted February 23, 2018 Martin were those shot at 3200? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin B Posted February 23, 2018 Share #13 Posted February 23, 2018 Martin were those shot at 3200? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Yes, all at ISO 3200! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A miller Posted February 23, 2018 Share #14 Posted February 23, 2018 Is this just like Tmax 400 only one stop faster? Or will the "3200" but inherently more pushable than the 400? 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrian Lord Posted February 23, 2018 Share #15 Posted February 23, 2018 (edited) Yes, all at ISO 3200!Impressive contrast and resolution. The last time I shot 3200 was the Ilford version and I made the mistake of keeping it for too long before exposing it and it had fogged. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Edited February 23, 2018 by Adrian Lord 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sblitz Posted February 23, 2018 Share #16 Posted February 23, 2018 Is this just like Tmax 400 only one stop faster? Or will the "3200" but inherently more pushable than the 400? According to one of the posts above, it is 800 film designed to be pushed to 3200 ..... if it really is that good, who needs a digital sensor? :-) 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A miller Posted February 23, 2018 Share #17 Posted February 23, 2018 (edited) According to one of the posts above, it is 800 film designed to be pushed to 3200 ..... if it really is that good, who needs a digital sensor? :-) right, but the Delta 3200 is a native 1600 designed to be pushed a stop. But many people generally just rate it at the native 1600. I'm wondering whether people will end up rating the Tmax at 800 or 1600 in order to avoid a heavily contrasty result (such as many posted above). Still a great thing (contrast is good!). Just posing some thoughts. Edited February 23, 2018 by A miller 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sblitz Posted February 23, 2018 Share #18 Posted February 23, 2018 right, but the Delta 3200 is a native 1600 designed to be pushed a stop. But many people generally just rate it at the native 1600. I'm wondering whether people will end up rating the Tmax at 800 or 1600 in order to avoid a heavily contrasty result (such as many posted above). Still a great thing (contrast is good!). Just posing some thoughts. Just have to buy a role and see .... some shots in daylight and some in the dark and see what happens Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Albertson Posted February 23, 2018 Share #19 Posted February 23, 2018 right, but the Delta 3200 is a native 1600 designed to be pushed a stop. But many people generally just rate it at the native 1600. I'm wondering whether people will end up rating the Tmax at 800 or 1600 in order to avoid a heavily contrasty result (such as many posted above). Still a great thing (contrast is good!). Just posing some thoughts. You can rate it at whatever speed you want for a different look. They've resurrected the developing-time tables of the old F-32 data sheet (and placed them in the new F-4001 data sheet on the Alaris Web site); there are developing times for a number of developers, at various EIs. I always thought it looked a bit flat at EI 800, and pushed Tri-X or TMX to that speed instead. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith (M) Posted February 23, 2018 Share #20 Posted February 23, 2018 right, but the Delta 3200 is a native 1600 designed to be pushed a stop. But many people generally just rate it at the native 1600. I'm wondering whether people will end up rating the Tmax at 800 or 1600 in order to avoid a heavily contrasty result (such as many posted above). Still a great thing (contrast is good!). Just posing some thoughts. From their data-sheet:- Because of the shape of the characteristic curve of the film, you will obtain better shadow detail and highlight separation when you expose it at EI 3200 or 6400 than you can obtain with 400-speed films pushed by 3 stops. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.