Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Big John

3rd party lens hoods for Zeiss 35/1.4 ZM distagon

Recommended Posts

I do not think that there is anything that really works well other than the Zeiss hood. The problem is the inevitable increase in finder blockage, and the official hood is vented to minimise this (though it is still a problem).

 

A simple alternative would be a single step-up ring (49mm to 52mm). I sometimes find this useful to avoid accidental finger marks, but it will not do much for flare suppression if that is what you want.

 

FWIW, the official hood is too shallow to do all that much for flare suppression (not a big problem with this lens anyway), but it does help protect the front element. Clear filters are not a good alternative because they can produce some nasty flare interactions with the concave surface of the front lens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Clear filters are not a good alternative because they can produce some nasty flare interactions with the concave surface of the front lens.

 

Better than the Zeiss pinch-cap, however, and you can always unscrew filter when taking photos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I should have added more. I will be using the ZM lens on an SL, so there are no issues about viewfinder blockage. I have today ordered the lens with a Zeiss UV filter. I don’t know if/how the hood fits with a filter installed - I have asked Zeiss via FB Messenger but they have had to speak to their product specialists.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As Lens is going to be used on SL and RF blockage is non issue try B&W who makes rubber collapsabl3 lens hoods, this’s is from Amazon UK, probably similar offering where you live.

 

https://www.amazon.co.uk/49mm-Collapsible-Rubber-Lens-Hood/dp/B0012FJF9Y

 

I usually find miscellaneous items in rummage bins of photo retailers, typically selling for pound/dollar a piece.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cosina makes the Zeiss ZM lenses and also their own Voigtlander. I found the Voigtlander hood for the VC 35 f1.4 lens also fits the Zeiss Biogon 35 f2.0 and the Planar 50 f2.0.

The Voigtlander 35 f1.2 also takes a bayonet hood. I don't know if it might fit the Zeiss 35 f1.4. The Zeiss takes an M49 filter and the VC 35 f1.2 an M52 filter, so it probably doesn't, but you might check.

I think the VC and Zeiss hoods of the same size are identical except for markings. The VC are priced some less, but not a lot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just realised that my Fuji x100s has same 49mm filter size so will try the 3rd party metal hood I bought for that (JJC from Amazon, v good quality).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For my 28 an 35mm Lenses acually I use these great hoods:

https://www.ebay.de/itm/Schlitzblende-kurz-49mm-Gegenlichtblende-Sonnenblende-Metall-Universal-49-mm/172361544871?hash=item28218c74a7:g:vQYAAOSwHBVZzPim

Available for  different filter sizes ...

Thanks Chris, these look v good. Can you pls confirm that they are bayonet mount and fit ok?

 

I tried my Fuji X100S hood and while it did sit on the front of the lens, it was very loose and rattled - so no good.

 

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Chris, these look v good. Can you pls confirm that they are bayonet mount and fit ok?

 

No, they are Threadmouint; as I wrote in different sizes.

So the fit is great

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By shirubadanieru
      Hi everyone, I was wondering if anyone has used the Sonnar 50mm f1.5 on a M film body and can tell me if the focus shift is noticeable? 
      I used to have this lens and loved it's small size and bokeh, but the focus shift on my digital M was too much so I decided to sell it.
      Thanks in advance!
    • By TM1ka
      2403520ZM,
      Imperia (IT)

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By malbooth
      LEICA Q (Type 116) 24.2MP Full Frame Summilux 28mm f/1.7 ASPH Lens Digital Camera. Condition is Used (purchased June 2017). 
      Includes all original boxes and documents, Leica Q strap and lens hood, plus one spare Leica battery and charger.
      I will post within Australia for free (standard shipping by Australia Post).
      I have been extremely happy with this camera and I'm only selling it to upgrade to the Leica Q2.
    • By malbooth
      LEICA Q (Type 116) 24.2MP Full Frame Summilux 28mm f/1.7 ASPH Lens Digital Camera. Condition is Used (purchased June 2017). 
      Includes all original boxes and documents, Leica Q strap and lens hood, plus one spare Leica battery and charger.
      I will post within Australia for free (standard shipping by Australia Post).
      I have been extremely happy with this camera and I'm only selling it to upgrade to the Leica Q2.
    • By Dennis
      Hola everyone!
       
      I had a hunch! And I made a lens exchange with a colleague. I changed my Elmarit 28mm for a Zeiss C Biogon T 35mm F2.8. Of course, I got also some very good money because of the difference in price ($2,300 vs $900 approx).
      I tested already and I'm incredibly happy with the result. I'm new in the world of Rangefinder, I only owned an Elmarit for one year, and now this one. I always used lenses for SLR and DSLR. So I'm very newbie.
      I was so surprised (in a very good way) about the Zeiss contrast, details, sharpening and almost the lack of imperfections... Wow... so light, small but soooo powerful. I'm a 35mm guy, I always have been. I got a 28mm with my first Leica (M10) because my plan was a 28+50 combo. One lens first, then later the 50mm. I didn't resist and I made the change. And I was 100% happy about it.
      I like the 35mm frames better than the 28mm. And the focus ring range is better, shortest. I like 1/3 aperture stops etc....
       
      But the lens comes with a detail...  check the videos here
      https://www.dropbox.com/sh/2y1inj9cq2tj8w6/AACwHw27CsRg6uhz1OTwKjBJa?dl=0&lst=
      ... you will understand it better.
       
      Check also this video at 1'08" 
       
      The little four screws are tight. And of course, most important... The lens performance is almost perfect, better than any Nikon I ever had 🙂 It works great. But it feels like is weak or more delicate, do you know what I mean
      Thanks in advance for your time
       
       
       
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue., Read more about our Privacy Policy