Jump to content

New subforum for L mount lenses? - L mount system?


marcg

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Does anyone else think that it might be time for a new subforum dealing simply with the range of L mount lenses which now cross a range of different Leica camera bodies.

 

This would reflect the approach in the M forum.

 

It's rather difficult to have to go searching for information and opinions about L mount lenses by visiting each of the particular camera subforums.

 

This could be a time to arrange a new "L mount system" forum and then have it contain all the various camera body sub- forums and also a dedicated L mount lens subforum.

 

This would fit in exactly with the M system organisation of subforums

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree too - and will do this sooner or later.

 

For SEO reasons I'll leave the Leica CL forum for a while and will then merge it with the T/TL section.

 

The right name will take some consideration:

Leica has named this L-bayonet APS-C system „APS-C system“ which contradicts the existing scheme. I'm not sure if they will stick with this...

 

We'll see...

 

Andreas

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree too - and will do this sooner or later.

 

For SEO reasons I'll leave the Leica CL forum for a while and will then merge it with the T/TL section.

 

The right name will take some consideration:

Leica has named this L-bayonet APS-C system „APS-C system“ which contradicts the existing scheme. I'm not sure if they will stick with this...

 

We'll see...

 

Andreas

 

 

Perhaps "Leica CL/TL System" (or "Leica TL/CL System")?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Bumping this thread as I believe it still makes sense...   

 

Both cameras have more in common (especially the lenses) than what divides them.  Even Leica's website puts the CL and TL2 together under LEICA APS-C SYSTEM.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. We are about three months down the line from the original request.

 

I'm not quite sure how the SEO issue is solved by delaying.

 

I would have thought that the transition to a single sub- forum should be made as quickly as possible so that the new setup can build up the Google reputation as early as possible.

 

Allowing a lot of time to pass simply allows a reputation to be build up in the old system which then has to be rebuilt when a new structure is implemented.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...