Jump to content

Leica M-A Negatives - Rounded corners?


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I recently purchased my first Leica M camera, an M-A.  I've only owned it for a short time but I'm already in love with it. 

 

I just started to make my first darkroom prints and have been enjoying the learning process thus far.   The first few prints I've made are 8x10s.  I didn't want to crop my images at all so I've been scaling down the image slightly on the enlarger so as to print the full frame on an 8x10 easel.  I noticed that my prints all had rounded corners rather than sharp 90 degree corners.  I took a look at my negatives under a loupe and see that the corners of the exposed images do, in fact, have round corners.  I don't see this in the scans of my images and I'm guessing that the scanner's negative carrier is masking off the corners and producing nice 90 degree angles.

 

So, my question is, is this normal or is there something out of whack with the camera?  Or is there some novice mistake I'm making that may be responsible for this?  If it's relevant, I've used a 35mm Summarit ASPH lens with hood attached to shoot all of my photos with the M-A and they all show this characteristic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Logan,

 

Welcome to the Forum.

 

When you look at the film frame in the camera, when you open the bottom & lift up the back: What do the corners of the film frame look like?

 

Best Regards,

 

Michael

Thanks Michael.

 

I took a close look at the corners of the film frame and, lo and behold, they certainly look rounded to me. I guess I should have thought to look before posting.

 

The next obvious question is, is that normal?

 

I did spend some time searching for other discussion threads that mentioned this but came up pretty empty. It is pretty subtle until you blow up the negative on an enlarger.

Edited by logan2z
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Logan,

 

I just went & checked: Nice square corners here with an M3.

 

By "rounded" do you mean rounded as it would be in a Kodachrome slide or on the 50mm frame of an M3 range/viewfinder?

 

Or do you mean: Just a tiny rounding in each corner?

 

How many times did you enlarge the image in order to see the rounding?

 

By the way, do you have an instruction booklet?

 

If you do: It should have a section devoted to what the film gate looks like.

 

Do you have a way to put a photo of your film gate here in this Thread?

 

Curious.

 

Please follow up & continue here.

 

Best Regards,

 

Michael

Edited by Michael Geschlecht
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll check out some of my M-A negatives when I get home from work and report what I find. I think it also is somewhat lens dependent because I recall that when I was using a 21mm Super Angulon the frame spacing was almost non-existant where using something like a 50mm Summicron or Elmar produced more distinct spacing (and edges).

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hello Logan,

 

I just went & checked: Nice square corners here with an M3.

 

By "rounded" do you mean rounded as it would be in a Kodachrome slide or on the 50mm frame of an M3 range/viewfinder?

 

Or do you mean: Just a tiny rounding in each corner?

 

How many times did you enlarge the image in order to see the rounding?

 

By the way, do you have an instruction booklet?

 

If you do: It should have a section devoted to what the film gate looks like.

 

Do you have a way to put a photo of your film gate here in this Thread?

 

Curious.

 

Please follow up & continue here.

 

Best Regards,

 

Michael

It's a pretty subtle rounding in each corner when looking at the film gate (and the negatives), but much more pronounced when the image is enlarged.

 

Not exactly sure how many times the image was enlarged, but it filled up a good portion of an 8x10 sheet of photo paper.  So a pretty decent amount of magnification.

 

I checked the instruction booklet and don't see any detailed information or images relating to the film gate.

 

I'll see if I can get a good enough photo of the corners of the film gate and post it here.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll check out some of my M-A negatives when I get home from work and report what I find. I think it also is somewhat lens dependent because I recall that when I was using a 21mm Super Angulon the frame spacing was almost non-existant where using something like a 50mm Summicron or Elmar produced more distinct spacing (and edges).

That would be great, thanks so much!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Logan,

 

What portion of how big of an enlargement are we writing about here?

 

!/4, 1/6 1/12 ?

 

OF:

 

4 X, 10 X, 20 X ?

 

That is to ask: How many centimeters is the right side portion in the photo on this Thread & how many centimeters is the bottom portion of the photo in this Thread.

 

NOT the size of the photo they were abstracted from.

 

Best Regards,

 

Michael

Edited by Michael Geschlecht
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Logan,

 

What portion of how big of an enlargement are we writing about here?

 

!/4, 1/6 1/12 ?

 

OF:

 

4 X, 10 X, 20 X ?

 

That is to ask: How many centimeters is the right side portion in the photo on this Thread & how many centimeters is the bottom portion of the photo in this Thread.

 

NOT the size of the photo they were abstracted from.

 

Best Regards,

 

Michael

 

The right side white border is 2.5 cm and the bottom white border is 1.25 cm.  Hopefully I'm answering the question you are asking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Logan,

 

You are doing just fine.

 

And How many centimeters by how many centimeters is the entire photo.

 

Having asked that question: I am now going to have to change into a pumpkin for a while.

 

I will be back.

 

This gives you time to measure the dimensions of the entire photo.

 

Best Regards,

 

Michael

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Logan,

 

You are doing just fine.

 

And How many centimeters by how many centimeters is the entire photo.

 

Having asked that question: I am now going to have to change into a pumpkin for a while.

 

I will be back.

 

This gives you time to measure the dimensions of the entire photo.

 

Best Regards,

 

Michael

 

The photo is 15.25 cm wide by 23.25 cm high.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a quick photo of the corner of my print so you can see the level of roundedness I'm talking about.

The rounding comes from the negative carrier. Most negative carriers crop into the image area, which is why a lot of people file them out to show the full frame and also give a black border.

 

Regarding the differing aspect ratio of the film frame and 10x8 paper, A4 is an alternative paper size with the same aspect ratio as the frame.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding the differing aspect ratio of the film frame and 10x8 paper, A4 is an alternative paper size with the same aspect ratio as the frame.

 

That was my original thought as well, but I see the rounding on my negatives and didn't see any rounded corners on the negative carrier(s) that I tried.

Edited by logan2z
Link to post
Share on other sites

That was my original thought as well, but I see the rounding on my negatives and didn't see any rounded corners on the negative carrier(s) that I tried.

If this was from the full frame of the negative it would print as black on the outer side of the curve.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If this was from the full frame of the negative it would print as black on the outer side of the curve.

Hmm that's true. Maybe the rounded corners I'm seeing on my negatives is a red herring. I did try multiple negative carriers in order to eliminate them as a cause and the prints came out the same. I also didn't see any rounding of their corners. I can't explain it. I guess I'll have another close look at the negative carriers and see if I overlooked something.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with the commenters who say those rounded corners look like the negative carrier not the camera.

 

That said, I have both an M-A and an M4, and while my M4 aperture is close to a perfect rectangle, my M-A aperture wobbles ever-so-slightly slightly on the right and left edges. Not easy to see by eye looking at the aperture itself, but apparent on a full-frame scan. My friend's M-A is the same way. As Leica's apertures are filed out larger than the 36x24mm standard (my M-A is close to 36.9mm x 24.7mm at its widest points), it's not something I worry too much about.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...