Jump to content

I got the new Leica Q today...


Anika

Recommended Posts

Same route: started with the Q and ended up selling my a7rii for the SL. The SL is a beast. The Q is the same!

 

I keep thinking about adding the SL to the Q and leaving the RF to my film Ms -- yes I view the SL as an SLR in experience (TTL, WYSIWYG). How do you like the combo, and do you have SL lenses for the SL?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I made my Q perfect with new flash SF40 - all I need now is a nice strap :-)

There are many great straps as shown on this forum. I have the Arte Di Mano case and matching 125cm strap. I love it. Luxurious every time I use it. Expensive. Worth it to me. Good luck finding one that works for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I keep thinking about adding the SL to the Q and leaving the RF to my film Ms -- yes I view the SL as an SLR in experience (TTL, WYSIWYG). How do you like the combo, and do you have SL lenses for the SL?

For me, the combo is perfect.  I use 28mm on everything (street photog, campaign shots-an overall go to cam).  The SL as well, or starting to.  I have the 50mm sl lux.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I keep thinking about adding the SL to the Q and leaving the RF to my film Ms -- yes I view the SL as an SLR in experience (TTL, WYSIWYG). How do you like the combo, and do you have SL lenses for the SL?

 

The Q is a fantastic camera, but it has its limitations. The SL is also a fantastic camera, but it is more versatile. That's why I think it's good to have both, which gives one the ability to choose the kit that best suits a particular photographic project or assignment. Sometimes it makes sense to carry both. As for myself, I have no history with Leica rangefinders, so I feel no sense of allegiance to them. It seems to me that more than a few SL owners have largely stopped using their Ms, though not all, to be sure.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

M9, M240 and M10 are the way to keep the legend of the M6, M7 etc. Only who had or wanted the Leica in the past, would really want the digital version of it. I could not afford the M6 or M7 that time and was able to get one now, so I got the one from today - the M10.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

The Q is a fantastic camera, but it has its limitations. The SL is also a fantastic camera, but it is more versatile. That's why I think it's good to have both, which gives one the ability to choose the kit that best suits a particular photographic project or assignment. Sometimes it makes sense to carry both. As for myself, I have no history with Leica rangefinders, so I feel no sense of allegiance to them. It seems to me that more than a few SL owners have largely stopped using their Ms, though not all, to be sure.

 

This is exactly my story... I never had any experience with Leica before the Q,

 

Bought a Q. Loved it. Bought an SL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...