Jump to content

The color of silver


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I thought I saw somewhere recently that following the M4 or M5, Leica altered their silver chrome process, and the "newer" (M4-2 and onward) bodies are a slightly different shade than the older ones, but now for the life of me, I can't seem to find the article or post where I read this.

 

Can anyone confirm (or am I making things up)? And if I'm not, if anyone out there happens to have a silver chrome M3/M2/M4 as well as a silver chrome M6/M7/MP/M-A and could post a side-by-side snapshot to illustrate the difference, I'd very curious to see! Thanks, all.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I can try and do a chrom M2 v MP. I'd have to remember to do it outside in the morning as it's dark when I get home these days and I don't have a flash for my SonyA7 that'll be taking the photo.

 

The MP has a more satin finish than the M2 some 40 years earlier. There are many pics in the I love my ... threads, sometimes the owners post there camera collection in a single photo.

 

The M6TTL and maybe the M6 had a zinc top so they were not chrome plated as the other models have brass tops for chrome plating.

 

The MP seems to show water marks more easily then M2 but the M2 shows fingerprints more easily well only slightly more, it's very subtle.

Lincoln

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The M6TTL and maybe the M6 had a zinc top so they were not chrome plated as the other models have brass tops for chrome plating.

 

 

Lincoln, thanks so much for the response. It slipped my mind when I was researching this that the M6 & M7 bodies have zinc top plates, and would thus be a third subtle variation altogether. 

 

I'm most interested in checking out the differences between the original brass body cameras (M3/M2/M4) and the current brass revivals (MP/M-A). If you have an opportunity to take a photo of your two, would love that! I found this photo of an M2 next to an M-A in a different review. It looks like your description of the newer cameras being more "satin" is right on the money. 

 

DSC0007.jpg?ssl=1

Edited by avatar230
Link to post
Share on other sites

Some bad iPhone snaps which only show the colours change more with lighting than they do between M2 and MP. The M2 is obviously 40 years older than the MP and so is slightly more worn.

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Side by side.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

While the M6 did have a zinc top plate, it was chrome plated, either silver or black chrome per order. For zinc the process would be a copper plate, then nickel plate, followed by chrome.

However, the appearance, sheen, and color of the chrome is largely a matter of the surface preparation before any of the plating starts, and the zinc prep would certainly be different than brass.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ANYWAY - yes, the "old" silver cladding from before 1980 or thereabouts has a grittier, dustier, more pebbly texture. And the fine bumps produce some diffraction, so that each speck can flash in colors slightly, especially under direct sunlight.

 

In this BIG image of an M3, you can see the faint texturing to the silver on the top and bottom plates, but also about 3 other silver "types" - brushed chrome on the center screwhead of the self-time lever; a "bright chrome" like automobile chrome on the dishes surrounding the shutter button and frame counter window (on top plate) and the screw on the rewind lever, and the lens release button/screw; and yet another "smooth" silver on the lens barrel.

 

http://www.kenrockwell.com/leica/m3/D3S_7742-1200.jpg

 

I really like the "old chrome" look - frankly, my 1967 silver Canon FX chrome looked "richer" and denser than today's Leicas.

 

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e4/Canon_FX_02.jpg

 

But I'm sure there are a host of possible reasons for the change, from cost and materials, to unsafe chemicals eventually ruled out by workplace-safety or ecological concerns, to a simple preference for the smoother, slicker, more paint-like silver chrome of today.

 

Maybe if I sand-blast my silver M10 slightly.... ;)

Edited by adan
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that aspiration, or a (mis)statement of fact?

 

I don't think the M262 is brass - isn't it aluminium? Similarly, the M6 had a zinc top plate, didn't it?

Facf.

 

Well this is the film forum so M262 really means nothing to me.

 

And yes, while the M6 was Zinc, it had a brass bottom plate. All film M had brass bottom plates.

---

 

Typos

Edited by NB23
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...