Jump to content

The curious case for the 40mm Summicron... With images


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

OK, I'll admit it I'm a bit nutty for Summicrons.  I have the 35mm ASPH the 50mm classic and the recently I found a 40mm (from the CL) for a measly $450 on fleabay.  OK you say, why? You have two perfectly good lenses that actually have matching frame lines on your M10.  There are two very good reasons I can come up with, the first is size.  The lens is downright diminutive.  It takes the M10 from small mirrorless to large point and shoot.  It's now suitable for stuffing in a Billingham Aeva 5 pouch and throwing on a belt even for casual nights out or chasing the kids around the playground.  Number 2 is it's actually a spectacular little lens with all the character and sharpness you could ever ask for.
I'm actually finding it perfect for environmental portraiture and general street pics.  It's also well suited to making multiple image panorama stitches with it's natural perspective.  More than anything though it's just a pretty lens and it can do about 80% of the job of both a 35mm and a 50mm as well as have it's own character.

OK so how do you frame it?  Honestly it's not hard, the 50mm frame lines come up with it attached and I just imagine the frame is just outside those lines and I'm pretty close.  For those instances where precise framing is necessary I always have live view.

lastly I have great little Minolta double asphere close up diopter that I've adapted and this makes the little 40mm perfect for certain macro shots (especially watches and camera gear).

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

It maybe but I never experimented (since I never shot them at f/2). Going back to 40 summicron-C, I pick it up along with my single lens kit (28mm cron) if I am in a mood to change lens. This and 90 macro-elmar are light enough that I don't sweat about carrying the extra weight.   From one of my hikes. 40 summicron-c on M240. Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!

After getting the Billingham AVEA 5 case for the M10 with the M-Rokkor 40mm I can easily pack it with me to work (bike and train commute in Beijing).  Saw this on the way in this morning (@ F5.6, uncropped)...   Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!  What do they say... "The best camera is the one you have with you?"   Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden conten

Photo showing the M10 with the M-Rokkor 40mm slipping into a Billingham AVEA 5 case.  Fantastic way to carry this small kit around (includes belt loops, if you like that).   Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!

Posted Images

Minimum focus...

 

With the Minolta Diopter...

Link to post
Share on other sites

great little lens ..... got interested in during a short stay in London, traveling to take shots with a fellow forum member. picked it up at Aperture for about the same price, perfect condition, form factor is so small as well. use it on my film Ms, (M4 and MA), and the pics are great. purchased in nyc a 40mm viewfinder from voigtlander vey helpful and at f/8 pretty much everything is in focus....i think this lens doesn't get quite enough publicity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Photo showing the M10 with the M-Rokkor 40mm slipping into a Billingham AVEA 5 case.  Fantastic way to carry this small kit around (includes belt loops, if you like that).

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I have Minolta Rokkor-M 40/2 CLE which is little bit ugly for bokeh on M-E, but on film M bodies it is sharper on medium distances than my Cron 50 IV and bokeh is fine.   

 

 

I frame it as 50mm and it helps with prints on 8x10, if I print on entire paper area as it is shown above. Here is another person (half-body) in the frame on shown picture, but it was cropped "naturally" during print on 8.5x11 (letter) darkroom paper. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd welded a CV 40/1.4 on my ZI since new...my 1C1L outfit and was very happy indeed.

 

My post is not about the CV lens...although it's just as good stopped down to the same aperture as other 40mm FL.

 

What I did was filing down the lens mount claw to bring up the 35mm FL frame-lines...ground glass on film plane conparison proved it was 100% coverage at the 35mm FL. This is much easier on a digital camera...VF to LCD direct comparison will prove the point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After getting the Billingham AVEA 5 case for the M10 with the M-Rokkor 40mm I can easily pack it with me to work (bike and train commute in Beijing).  Saw this on the way in this morning (@ F5.6, uncropped)...

 

 

What do they say... "The best camera is the one you have with you?"  

Edited by mdemeyer
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a nice little and inconspicuous lens - I tested it once briefly when a friend of mine got it. The main con of this lens is its doughnut bokeh IMO - you either love or hate it. 

I have 40 summicron-C and I agree about the bokeh....but.. it is not very far from 35 FLE wide open. 35 FLE also can show not so good bokeh depending on the subject (bright with sharp corners). Compared to both, 50 lux is buttery smooth. This is why I tend to use 50 lux more now. But the size and weight of 40 summicron-c is hard to beat. I have very nice pictures shot with it.

 

40 Summicron-C bokeh crop

 

35 FLE  bokeh crop

 

50Lux bokeh crop

Link to post
Share on other sites

In practical use, 40 summicron-C's bokeh is not bad. I will happily take this lens on a outing.



This is shot wide open using 40 Summicron-C on M240.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have 40 summicron-C and I agree about the bokeh....but.. it is not very far from 35 FLE wide open. 35 FLE also can show not so good bokeh depending on the subject (bright with sharp corners). Compared to both, 50 lux is buttery smooth. This is why I tend to use 50 lux more now. But the size and weight of 40 summicron-c is hard to beat. I have very nice pictures shot with it.

 

40 Summicron-C bokeh crop

exp_sm_20160506M240_40mm_FOV_bokeh_test-1001752.jpg

 

35 FLE  bokeh crop

exp_sm_20160506M240_35mmFLE_FOV_bokeh_test-1001751.jpg

 

50Lux bokeh crop

exp_sm_20160506M240_50mm_LUX_FOV_bokeh_test-1001753-2.jpg

 

Which aperture(s) did you use for this comparo if i may ask?

Edit: Sorry i've just seen that you've used f/1.4 for both your 35/1.4 and 50/1.4. No wonder why you've got the feeling that bokeh was smoother then. I would redo the test at f/2 and you will see that this is not true any more i suspect.

Edited by lct
Link to post
Share on other sites

Which aperture(s) did you use for this comparo if i may ask?

Edit: Sorry i've just seen that you've used f/1.4 for both your 35/1.4 and 50/1.4. No wonder why you've got the feeling that bokeh was smoother then. I would redo the test at f/2 and you will see that this is not true any more i suspect.

I did the test (its an old test) according to how I shoot. I don't close 35 FLE and 50 Lux to f/2. I either shoot them at f/1.4 or around f/5.6. There is no usefulness of f/2 behavior of these lenses to me.

 

The conclusion from my test was:

- 35 FLE bokeh wide open is not smooth for some objects. 40 summicron-c wide open is not far off (being at f/2). I don't think FLE is going to smoothen out at f/2.

- bokeh difference (wide open) is big between 50 lux and 40 summicron-c (and it is expected). This allows me to choose between 50 lux (people shot) and 40 summicron-c (landscape).

Edited by jmahto
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK but comparing apples to apples i.e. same apertures, neither 35/1.4 FLE nor 50/1.4 asph have butterly smooth bokeh at f/2 in my own experience. Been using both Leica and Minolta 40/2 for many years and i don't find their bokeh significantly harsher at f/2. Subjective matter though. YMMV.

Edited by lct
Link to post
Share on other sites

The 40mm cron-c has seen many actions paired with my M9, M8, and now M2. 

 

A few from the past: 

 

 

on M9

 

 

On M8

 

 

On M8, SOOC

 

on M2 with ilford HP5+

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK but comparing apples to apples i.e. same apertures, neither 35/1.4 FLE nor 50/1.4 asph have butterly smooth bokeh at f/2 in my own experience. Been using both Leica and Minolta 40/2 for many years and i don't find their bokeh significantly harsher at f/2. Subjective matter though. YMMV.

It maybe but I never experimented (since I never shot them at f/2). Going back to 40 summicron-C, I pick it up along with my single lens kit (28mm cron) if I am in a mood to change lens. This and 90 macro-elmar are light enough that I don't sweat about carrying the extra weight.

 

From one of my hikes. 40 summicron-c on M240.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had a 2.0/40 Summicron-C for some time.  It used to get a more use when paired with my 1.4/75 Summilux due to similar rendering and colouring, but I found that the focal length wasn't quite far enough from the 75. So I found a nice 2.0/35 Summicron IV which pairs with the 75 very nicely.  35 is just far enough from the 40 to make it worthwhile.  

 

The 40 is now a bit lonely and unloved.  Time to get it out again :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great little lens indeed. I used mine a lot on the Epson R-D1 whose frame lines are accurate enough, which is not the case on my later M8.2 and M240 so it tends to stay on its shelve now due also to the competition of 35mm lenses and a tiny CV 40/2.8 giving funny results on my A7s mod. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • jaapv changed the title to The curious case for the 40mm Summicron... With images

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By horosu
      Leica Summicron 8 Elements (product number 11308) from 1965 in splendid condition.    The lens has just been lubricated in Leicashop (Vienna) so that focusing is silky smooth (invoice available to back this up). Aperture detents are nice and firm. The optical parts are fungus and oil-free.Overall, a wonderful example of this lens.    International shipping by UPS Saver for quick delivery via air-mail (the next day for EU addresses). Payment by bank transfer or Paypal (+3%).
    • By bernabei
      Hi everyone,
      I'll be moving away from my 12 year old Canon body and wanted a camera to use everyday. Given this requirement, I was keen on checking out the M10 with a 35 summicron. I recently tried this setup at a Leica store and really liked the compact RF setup. As an everyday camera, size/weight is definitely really important and this is one area the M system shines. However, I can't quite get over the fact that the skill set of the M is a little limited. A mirrorless camera will allow me to also dabble in the limited landscape/wildlife stuff I do whenever I travel. The SL2 S seems to be a camera which can do most things pretty well though it may not be the best as a camera to use during general day to day stuff. In the future (say in 1-3 years), I see myself having an M and a mirrorless due to their vastly different abilities but right now, I need to think about where to start. I think that a practical approach would be to start with a SL2 S and use an M 35 summicron with it. This would not be too large a setup and the SL system would allow me to use some other lenses for landscape or wildlife as the need arises. I've heard that the BSI sensor on the SL2 S is also really good and it would really excel in many scenarios. In a while (maybe when the M11 launches?), I could potentially get an M body and thereby have the best of both worlds. But as it stands today, I need to decide between the M10 + 35 summicron vs SL2 S + M 35 summicron and would love to hear your thoughts (both options are around 8k-9k USD). Any other suggestions are also welcome.
      I haven't used the SL2 S but how does it behave as an EDC with small M glass? Even if the size isn't too much more, does the extra weight (930 gms vs 660 gms for the M10) pose challenges? Is the M10 sensor dated now and am I better off waiting for a bit?
      Please let me know what you think!
      Cheers!
    • By Monochrome_Man
      First of all: hello everybody
      I want to buy Summicron 50mm f2 v3. I have 2 dfferent lens to choose:
      1. lens form about 1969r and it look like this:
      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden! 2. lens from 1974 and this one is looking as is:
      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden! In theory both are in good shape, after cla and working good. BUT is any difference beside desgin of lens from 1974 over older one? Price is nearyly the same.
      Second set is more complete, lens hood etc.... but first one is in shop in my city, second one --- only shipping.
       
      link to wiki: https://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-wiki.en/index.php/Summicron_(II)_f%3D_5_cm_1:2
    • By Zero9
      I started with Leica m9 and fell in love with the manual focus, small and discrete of a Leica range finder. However, I have a poor eye sight and always wear glasses. Tried diopter but not really a solution.
      Then I got the m10 along with the evf. Although the evf doesn’t give the same rangefinder experience, I find it easier to focus with evf and magnifying than ovf, especially when shooting at low light or complex subject.
       
      In terms of lenses, I have the following:
      35mm sim micron 7 elements 
      noctilux 50 1.0 v3
      summilux 50 1.4 asph
      summicron 90 2 apo asph
      With my poor eyesight, the only lens I’m comfortable with while using the ovf is the 50 1.4asph.
      I cannot fully see the 35mm frame line, and the 90mm is like a sniper scope.
      Recently a friend asked me if I want to switch my m10 with his sl2s in addition with some cash. I’m not considering any sl lenses in the near future, so probably just using a adapter along with my m lenses.

      however,  I’m not really sure if the better electronic system and better evf will justify the additional weight and bulky body of a sl?
      any kind of input is appreciated!
      thanks 

       
       
       

       
       
    • By samlee.hk
      I got a Light Lens Lab v2LC 35mm f2 Summicron Copy last week
      Overall, the Lenses share similar tone to Leica Summicrion 35/2, with good enough micro contrast, sharp in a relative cheap price level. 
      I like using color pic more than BW pic when using v2LC. 
      For me, the main difference between Leica Summicron , which can provide a more rich image texture and 3D rendering. But Light lens Labs 35/2 did a good job at this price level. 

      Light lens Labs 35mm F2, Leica M10D, TCP Vision3 500T film Preset 


      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
      Light lens Labs 35mm F2, Leica M10D, TCP K64 Film Preset

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden! Light lens Labs 35mm F2, Leica M10D, TCP Vision3 200T film Preset 

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
      Light lens Labs 35mm F2, Leica M10D, TCP K64 Film Preset

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden! Light lens Labs 35mm F2, Leica M10D, LR10.2, Nik Sliver Efex2

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!  
      For More PIC and reviews , Please read :

      Light Lens Lab v2LC Summicron 35mm f2
×
×
  • Create New...