Jump to content
schattenundlicht

Origin of negative scratches?

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi!

 

Today I received a batch of negatives which I had processed and scanned at a dedicated b/w lab. Usually I do the scanning myself, but this time I needed some quick results to check the technical validity of some vintage cameras and I had little spare time available. These scans are low res jpeg and only substitute for contacts. I am thinking of re-entering the dark abodes of home-developing, especially after reviewing the result that I want to query this forum about.

 

Seven rolls of TriX, TMax and HP5 from diffeent cameras (M3, IIIf, M7) came out fine, but one roll of film (TMax) from a 1934 IID shows peculiar scratches not typical of ones that I have seen or produced myself before.

 

Since this is the only roll of film from this newly acquired camera that I have available (it is currently away for a focusing CLA), I would be particularly interested in whether it is a problem that might be related to the camera or whether it is related to film handling pre/during/post development, which I find more likely. Since I bought the camera from a respected dealer, he should be noticed of any problems soon as possible.

 

The scratches start at #25 and continue until #36A, where the scratch line tapers off into the perforation. It is not a strictly parallel scratch like ones I have seen from damaged back plates or sloppy enveloping/ rolling and it is not continuous for all the way.

 

I will post three example images. I hope diagnosis can be made from forum resolution.

 

(1): #29, Inadvertent picture of my lens cap (idiot me

)

(2): #32, Oyster bed, 300 million years old, today grounding a cottage, situated 600 Km from the nearest shoreline

(3): #35, Casino, Wiesbaden, Germany

 

Has anybody seen a scratch configuration like this before?

 

Thanks!

 

Kind regards, Mathias

 

EDIT: By the way, the scratches are on the emulsion side.

Edited by schattenundlicht

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jeff, thank you very much for the suggestion! However, that post seems to deal with fine strictly horizontal scratches, which I have seen before, due to either backplate issues, coarse dust in the film canister lid, or storing an uncut negative in a loosely rolled fashion.

 

I have never seen (and have not yet found a description of) these diagonal, partially interrupted, partially wavy lines posted above. Still puzzled...

 

Mathias

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those look like handling scratches, I have seen similar when I dropped a wet film after pulling it off the reel.

Thanks! This would explain the semi-directed/ semi-random nature of the scratches on my film.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Digital noise around the scratch lines could be also be attributed to scanning..,,

http://www.richardphotolab.com/blog/common-film-scan-issues-and-what-you-can-do-about-them

Jeff

Thanks for pointing out this helpful page! This troubleshooting guide should also place a high propability on "mishandling".

 

Any noise/edge effects in my posted pictures are most propably due to the additional compression mandated by forum limits. The scratches can be seen on the emulsion side of the negative with unaided eye.

 

Kind regards,

 

Mathias

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those look like handling scratches, I have seen similar when I dropped a wet film after pulling it off the reel.

 

Right. Could also happen if someone tries to strip of the water from a wet film with a film wiping tong - which is always a bad idea us a wet rag instead !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never seen (and have not yet found a description of) these diagonal, partially interrupted, partially wavy lines posted above. Still puzzled...

 

Further to the suggestion above, the scratches could well come from a squeegee. The action that people use with a squeegee often has a diagonal bias as they tend to sweep from one end of the blades to the other as they move down the negative. 

Edited by almoore

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Use wetting agent as a last bath for 1min and squeegee only with your fingers once or twice immediately after hanging.

If this is the cause of course.

I wonder why ot only happens with one particular camera thus far and not with others.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Use wetting agent as a last bath for 1min and squeegee only with your fingers once or twice immediately after hanging.

If this is the cause of course.

I wonder why ot only happens with one particular camera thus far and not with others.

It might be that the lab was pressed for time and that they botched up a single film of the batch I sent to them. Or they were not processed in the same tank at the same time (although there was more than one T-Max in the batch) and a different tech took care of that film. I will most propably never find out. They did not even respond to a feedback I gave them including the above scans. In another batch I had them do some weeks earlier there were an awful lot of drying marks that point to not or inadequately using wetting agent.

 

Thus I am inclined to delve into developing on my own (again) after more than 30 years of darkroom abstinence...

 

Somehow I delude myself that having only myself to blame for resulting technical inadequacies will be more bearable :wink:

Edited by schattenundlicht

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thus I am inclined to delve into developing on my own (again) after more than 30 years of darkroom abstinence...

 

That's what I did after finding that my local laboratories were simply not very good. I process B&W, C-41 and I'm about to do my first E-6 in 30 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look like 100% bad handling. They should give OP money back.

 

Where are many reasons why and where films getting scratched. But if no sloppy work is involved as shown in OP lab ruined examples, scratches are strictly horizontal.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Somehow I delude myself that having only myself to blame for resulting technical inadequacies will be more bearable :wink:

That's not a delusion at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Similar Content

    • By Anigrapher
      Hallo werte Leica-Forumsteilnehmer,
      vor gut einem Jahr hatte ich mich wegen eines Belichtungsproblems meiner R4 hier im Leica-Forum bereits zu Wort gemeldet (und weiss nun endlich auch, dass der kleine Elektromagnet, der die Springblende im rechten Moment stoppen soll, defekt ist. Alle bisherigen Reparaturangebote überstiegen aber bei weitem den Wert der Kamera, so dass ich mir als "vorläufigen" Ersatz für mein R-System eine zweite R5 zugelegt habe, die auch glücklicherweise tadellos funktioniert...).
      Ich möchte Heute aber ein anderes Thema ansprechen, welches mir schon seit einiger Zeit sprichwörtlich "unter den Fingernägeln brennt": Findet ihr auch, dass innerhalb von nur gut ein bis zwei Jahren das Preisniveau der Analogfotografie exorbitant gestiegen ist???
      Klar, dass das fast schon unterirdische Preisniveau für alte Kameras, Filme, Entwickler & Entwicklungslabore von vor gut zehn Jahren längst Geschichte ist, nie mehr wiederkehren wird und sicherlich auch dem Fortbestand der filmbasierten Fotografie nicht unbedingt förderlich war. Nischeninteressen können durchaus kostspielig sein, und dazu gehört klassisches Fotografieren auf Film ja inzwischen eindeutig. Aber was jetzt gerade abgeht - ganz ohne Corona-Krise - ist nun wirklich teils schon absurd! Da werden etwa für uralte, abgelaufene 135er-Diafilme wie Agfa Precisa oder Kodak Elitechrome teilweise reinste Wucherpreise verlangt. Hier mal ein Beispiel aus dem bekannten Online-Auktionskaufhaus:  https://www.ebay.de/itm/Fur-Sammler-1x-Agfa-Agfaphoto-Precisa-CT-100-36-Diafilm-Ablaufdatum-2014-12/223921237768?hash=item3422beef08:g:-OAAAOSwvRJeTrdi Aha, für Sammler also - ernsthaft?! Es gibt wirklich schon Leute, die jetzt unbedingt noch mal einen erst vor kurzem ausgelisteten Drogeriemarkt-Diafilm verknipsen wollen und bereit sind, derartige Wucherpreise zu berappen??? Bei den gebrauchten Kameras sieht es nicht besser aus. Auch hier meint wohl mittlerweile jeder windige, Opas Keller ausräumende Erbschaftler irgendeiner banalen Durchschnitts-Spiegelreflex, er habe das große Los gezogen und müsste hinsichtlich des aufgerufenen Verkaufspreises nun einen auf Fachhändler machen. Kam mir jedenfalls so vor, als ich unlängst eine Kamera für eine fotografierende Freundin aussuchen durfte, die nicht allzu teuer sein und einen PK-Anschluss haben sollte. Also mal bei Ebay-Kleinanzeigen nach alten Ricohs umgesehen, weil diese entsprechend eigener Erfahrung einfach, gut und robust sind. Doch dann kam tatsächlich nur sowas hier bei rum: https://www.ebay-kleinanzeigen.de/s-anzeige/ricoh-xr-10-mit-zubehoer/1332175555-245-4619 Die gleiche Kamera - ich würde sie als ganz gut ausgestattetes Einsteigergerät bezeichnen - habe ich noch mit einem deutlich besseren 50er-P-Rikenon vor drei Jahren für sage und schreibe 15 Euro bei einem Fachhändler (!) als Wühltischfund erworben. Sie funktioniert übrigens ganz ausgezeichnet, was ich von den genannten Privatangeboten eher nicht erwarten würde... Ich bin wohl nicht der Einzige, dem dieses aktuelle Wucherpreisniveau auf dem Gebrauchtmarkt aufgefallen ist, auch der von mir sehr geschätzte Foto-Youtuber Steffen Schüngel hat dies unlängst thematisiert: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YN1hXQmbaNA
      Was meint ihr, findet ihr auch, dass die derzeit stark steigende Preisspirale im Endeffekt zu einer weiteren Abnahme an Filmfotografie-Interessierten - inzwischen soll das "Jammertal" ja schon durchschritten sein und wieder mehr auf Film fotografiert werden - und damit irgendwann zu einem selbst für den geneigten Leica-Nutzer kaum noch bezahlbaren Vergnügen werden könnte? Die verschiedenen Meinungen hierzu würden mich mal interessieren.
       
      Grüße an alle Leica-Fans,
      Anigrapher
    • By robert_parker
      Hi Everyone
      I've just got a film back from a develop and scan, with apparent processing problems - I wondered if those with more experience might tell me what I'm looking at - are these drying marks on the negative, or a (Noritsu) scanner problem?
      If the problem is that the negs haven't been dried correctly and marks are showing during the scan, is there any way of getting the marks off the negatives ?
      Thanks in advance for your comments
      (for info camera is 11f Red Dial in great condition, 3,5 Red Scale Elmar the same, Fison hood in place, film is XP2 C41 processed)

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By gwpics
      Life is pretty quiet photographically for me at the moment, mostly due to really bad weather with heavy rain which makes street photography almost impossible. This means I am continuing my journey through my archives, and this I had forgotten. It shows a typical English pastime - playing bowls. The white clothes are the standard dress for everyone, and afternoon tea is almost compulsory. English tradition at its best.
      Leica M3 + 50mm Summicron f2. Ilford 400 Delta. 1997.

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By ashley12234
      Hello everyone!
      I'm new to the leica film cameras but I came up a rather very nice iiif in great condition which comes with a summarit 50mm f1.5 going for about $550. This sounded like a pretty good deal to me, however, upon closer inspection the lens seemed to have a lot of haze (not sure about fungus) as when I performed the light test there were specks everywhere. It seemed to be internal and in the second glass?? Not sure how to fix it or if I even can, also the focus ring was pretty stiff (but that isn't a deal breaker or anything). Like I said, the body of the camera was in very good condition however the lens is my biggest concern. As most of you are owners/experts and such please help me out and let me know if this is a good deal or not. 
      Thanks, Ashley
    • By Andreas_Kreuz
      Immer mehr Flughäfen rüsten ihre Sicherheitsschleusen auf neuartige CT-Scanner um, auch in Deutschland. Sie bringen für Flugpassagiere deutlich mehr Komfort, Filme und Fotopapier werden hingegen bereits bei einem Durchgang durch die Geräte ruiniert – davor warnen jetzt Kodak Alaris und Ilford unabhängig voneinander.
      https://www.photoscala.de/2020/02/02/gefahr-am-airport-neue-ct-scanner-ruinieren-jeden-film/
       
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue., Read more about our Privacy Policy