Jump to content

TL2 versus the Q comparison


Recommended Posts

Hi all, I have two questions not exactly refering to the original thread subject yet will ask here .

 

Has anyone compared  the TL2 with the SL in APS-C mode  - I mean with the same lens mounted on each body - ?!

Would the output quality be similar ?

 

Quoting Jonathan Slack : "I would love an APS-C mini SL" ...

 

 

Any progress on the Visoflex EVF / TL2 issue?!

 

Best, JM.

 

The TL2 has better IQ than a cropped SL. Over 50% more resolution which is a noticeable gain.

 

The EVF issue was solved long ago with f.w.1.1.

 

The TL2 isn't close to a mini SL. A few of us are hoping "Clooney" is.......

 

Gordon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends whether you're counting pixels or measuring pixel density.

 

24 MP are 100% more pixels than 12 MP equaling a 100% higher resolution. The density of twice the amount of pixels  on the same surface is twice the density. So the TL2 has 100% more resolution  than  the SL at APSC, never 50%. The SL on the other hand has only 50% of  the resolution of the TL2 at APSC, so if you put  it that way it works.

 

My apologies for now definitely being a smartass :)

Edited by Lazytiger
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...