Choice between 2 images from Turks & Caicos?

[Guest]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I posted these two pictures in the Summaron-M f/5.6 28mm thread and several people liked the first one better. First, this is a restaurant called Da Conch Shack on Providenciales, an island in Turks & Caicos. The man in both pictures is the same waiter. (I used the new Sumaron-28 and the M10).

 

At first, when I examined in Lightroom the pictures shot that day, I instantaneously selected the second picture as the one to process, like selecting a frame from a contact sheet of a roll of 35mm film. After that I went on to process the first picture, which I liked less. However, when deciding which picture to post to my flickr site, I selected the first picture because I thought viewers would like it more because, overall, it's a pleasing composition in terms of balance, the top window not being cut off, and giving more of what people often call a "sense of place" — it is also a prettier scene: I'm using the word "prettier" intentionally here.

 

Nevertheless, I kept on looking at the second picture and continued to feel that it's a better photograph: a more dynamic composition, and I liked the oranges in the sand, at the bottom of the frame, against the blues in the image; but, most strikingly, I liked the gesture of the tree matching the gesture of the man, "gesture" in the sense of attitude, as in a "gesture drawing." For me, the second image says more and says it more forcefully — more meaning and more expression. In this sense, the chair in the left bottom foreground I see  helpful rather than, as many might feel, unneeded.

 

Generally, my feeling is that, in judging images, our instantaneous first choice is, in most cases, likely to be the right one — the right one for ourselves, that is. Which picture do you prefer, and why?

_______________

Alone in Bangkok essay on BURN Magazine

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

[djmay]

If you like the second better, then that is what counts.

 

I also like the second better. It has a visual from lower right to upper left. The waiter and tree create the flow. In the first, the tree is a detracting element.

 

Jesse

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Advertisement]

The Leica Q3 is available for pre-order at B&H Photo Video and Adorama

[stuny]

I think one of the reasons I like #2 better is the foreground palm tree is lighter.

[James S]

Well I'm going to go with the original thread and say I prefer the first. While I prefer the exposure of the second, I still find the waiter too dark and don't like the way he melds with the chair!

[Gvasseur]

For me The second on Ismail The n'est composition.

[Gvasseur]

Sorry automatic correction, The second one is the best composition.

[pmendelson]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Personally I much prefer the second composition due to the position of the waiter - you can see what he is doing (i.e., carrying plates as part of his job) and his body position echoes the angle of tree in the foreground.  He is also nicely separated from the background.  I love Da Conch Shack and have many photos from there.

Edited August 9, 2017 by pmendelson

[david strachan]

I'll go with the first...but lift the shadows to emphasise the subject

 

Both pics are too busy to be considered keepers.

 

Need cropping. The left hand stuff is irrelevant

 

 

 

...

Edited August 9, 2017 by david strachan