Jump to content

50 APO - what do you see as the difference?


Jon Warwick

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

[...] I guess what I'm asking is the magic of the 50/APO really that magical? 

 

Not sure what magical means exactly but a magical lens should "imprint it's stamp" to borrow the excellent word above i guess ;). Seriously, I can add very little to the pics you may wish to download here.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what magical means exactly but a magical lens should "imprint it's stamp" to borrow the excellent word above i guess ;). Seriously, I can add very little to the pics you may wish to download here.

 

 

I did look at them. Thanks for posting. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats pretty much nails it. I agree I don't need the APO likewise I don't need the 21LUX the 21/3.4 asph would make more sense. I guess what I'm asking is the magic of the 50/APO really that magical?

You want some of that ThreeDeeNess, dontcha?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The difference? If you need or prefer to shoot wide-open, there is nothing like it.

Bokeh is smooth but without much character or 'signature', making the subject, resolved to an extraordinarily high level and with equally impressive color fidelity, stand out all the more. Someone suggested in a different thread that the contrast increases at the point/plane of focus and is rendered lower elsewhere in the frame; if true, this would further add to the "3D" effect talked about.

 

On a Monochrome, the true resolving potential of the sensor is realized. 

 

f/4? f/5.6? I couldn't tell it apart from the 50 Summilux. Or the Summicron 50 V5, for that matter. Monochrom excepted.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Someone suggested in a different thread that the contrast increases at the point/plane of focus and is rendered lower elsewhere in the frame; if true, this would further add to the "3D" effect talked about.

There are a few interviews on the internet with Peter Karbe that suggests that is indeed one of the lens' designs.

 

Whatever he's done, it's really good in creating this 3D effect. I see a clear difference in this regard between my 50 APO and other M lenses, and I really like it.

 

I also agree that the APO's advantage is more visible with the Monochrom.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that the APO-Summicron-M 50 really sings with Monochrom body. At low light and shooting with open aperture, the advantage of APO is very clear.

Except that "APO" correction is for color, only. Therefore making "the advantage of APO" exactly Zero, in real life, on a monochrom.

 

The whole point of a APO lens is color phorography.

 

But yeah, spread yet another leica myth around. That's why the internet exists.

 

--

Edited typos

Edited by NB23
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Except that "APO" correction is for color, only. Therefore making "the advantage of APO" exactly Zero, in real life, on a monochrom.

 

The whole point of a APO lens is color phorography.

 

But yeah, spread yet another leica myth around. That's why the internet exists.

 

--

Edited typos

There you go misinforming the readers again. APO has as much to do with mono as well as color.

 

http://stason.org/TULARC/recreation/photography/lenses-faq/31-What-do-APO-and-Apochromatic-mean.html

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Except that "APO" correction is for color, only. Therefore making "the advantage of APO" exactly Zero, in real life, on a monochrom.

 

The whole point of a APO lens is color phorography.

 

But yeah, spread yet another leica myth around. That's why the internet exists.

 

--

Edited typos

 

Hello NB23,

 

Actually, apochromatic correction is just as important in black & white photography as it is in color photography. 

 

A print that appears as tones of gray is created from an image made of light of various colors striking the film/sensor surface.

 

The more correctly the lens transmits these rays of different colors to that film/sensor surface, the more accurately they will create a colored image of the original subject on that film/sensor surface. Which will be displayed as a black & white image.

 

There is NOT a separate set of black & white rays of light travelling thru the lens creating a black & white image.

 

Best Regards,

 

Michael

Edited by Michael Geschlecht
  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone compared the APO to Summi non-APO after applying a bit of PS magic?  When I read 'pop', I think post and side by side comparison in a decent sized print like 17x22".  I'm printing B&W pretty much exclusively these days, all shot with M240 & Summi 50 ver 4 or Summi 35 ASPH printed with Piezography inks on good paper.  They all benefit from a bit of pop via curves and curve masking.

 

Is there a visible 3x improvement equal to the price difference?  If so, I'll start saving up - tho I'm skeptical there can be that much difference.

 

Samples anyone?  Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone compared the APO to Summi non-APO after applying a bit of PS magic?  When I read 'pop', I think post and side by side comparison in a decent sized print like 17x22".  I'm printing B&W pretty much exclusively these days, all shot with M240 & Summi 50 ver 4 or Summi 35 ASPH printed with Piezography inks on good paper.  They all benefit from a bit of pop via curves and curve masking.

 

Is there a visible 3x improvement equal to the price difference?  If so, I'll start saving up - tho I'm skeptical there can be that much difference.

 

Samples anyone?  Thanks!

 

 

How do you quantify a 3x improvement? We're talking aesthetics here, right?

 

I would suggest finding a way to test the lens for yourself.

Edited by rsmphoto
Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a visible 3x improvement equal to the price difference?  If so, I'll start saving up - tho I'm skeptical there can be that much difference.

 

Keep your money then or you will be disappointed. Your criteria are too low for that with respect. If your question was is there a significant improvement out of a 42MP camera i would say perhaps although i did not do the test but out of a modest 24MP's the least one millimeter move of a slider in C1 will do much more for 3D rendering i must say. Unless you expect 3D in the corners at f/2 that is. FWIW.

Edited by lct
Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep your money then or you will be disappointed. Your criteria are too low for that with respect. If your question was is there a significant improvement out of a 42MP camera i would say perhaps although i did not do the test but out of a modest 24MP's the least one millimeter move of a slider in C1 will do much more for 3D rendering i must say. Unless you expect 3D in the corners at f/2 that is. FWIW.

I'd agree with that, especially given the question related to roughly 20" wide prints, which aren't especially massive.

 

At large print sizes you'll see a difference (especially 3D ness given the APO's very sharp roll off in contrast from the perfectly in focus plane) and as before, the Monochrom will especially show the benefits due to its inherent higher resolution due to no colour filter etc that improves resolution (and lowers artefacts) compared to the low resolution 24mp colour cameras.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...