fotografr Posted January 22, 2017 Author Share #21 Posted January 22, 2017 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) If members gets so out of control as to rate being banned, they are not, in my opinion, "valuable members." What bothers me about taboos on certain topics is the underlying assumption that we members are incapable of disagreeing with each other without becoming hostile and abusive. This entire thread about the pros and cons of banning political commentary is proof that we can disagree in a polite fashion. I completely agree that you should not be playing the role of schoolmaster. If these pre-emptive rules didn't exist, you wouldn't have to. Any member is free at any time to report abusive behavior. I don't understand why that's not sufficient. Edited January 22, 2017 by fotografr 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 22, 2017 Posted January 22, 2017 Hi fotografr, Take a look here Locked Thread. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
jaapv Posted January 22, 2017 Share #22 Posted January 22, 2017 It is not the member getting out of control. It is the process escalating and members being caught up. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografr Posted January 22, 2017 Author Share #23 Posted January 22, 2017 (edited) So you assume we cannot discuss political issues without escalating and getting out of control? That is tantamount to treating us like children. Nobody ever has to get "caught up," as you put it. One is free at any time to exit a discussion. This back and forth is getting us nowhere. You're the moderator and there's no way anything I say here will change the forum rules. I'll just leave it at this point. Edited January 22, 2017 by fotografr Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A miller Posted January 22, 2017 Share #24 Posted January 22, 2017 (edited) Jaap - I agree with the person who expressed that it was a moderator (Erl, who I have a lot of respect for) who arguably instigated the political discussion in Brent's thread by alleging that American's got the election "so wrong." I think this should be acknowledged and addressed; either it was a mistake to say this or it was not, in which case you have tied yourself up in a bit of a knot. I frankly don't like to be told that I am "so wrong" by people when I click on this forum. It is not worth the time to discuss the issue and it is not why I am here and pay to be here. I don't want the forum cluttered with people telling me how wrong, stupid and evil I am. Go to FACEBOOK and TWITTER to express yourself in this regard! Edited January 22, 2017 by A miller Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografr Posted January 22, 2017 Author Share #25 Posted January 22, 2017 (edited) Go to FACEBOOK and TWITTER to express yourself in this regard!If we do that, Mr Trump will get up at 3 AM and unleash a twitter rant on us. Seriously, though, why isn't it possible to just ignore comments you don't agree with and move on? I don't think anyone wants to have the forum permeated with heated political debates, but on the infrequent occasion when images with political content spark discussions, I really don't see the problem with letting that happen. Edited January 22, 2017 by fotografr Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A miller Posted January 22, 2017 Share #26 Posted January 22, 2017 If we do that, Mr Trump will get up at 3 AM and unleash a twitter rant on us. Seriously, though, why isn't it possible to just ignore comments you don't agree with and move on? Ha ha Truth is that I don't have the impulse control that you do. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted January 22, 2017 Share #27 Posted January 22, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) So you assume we cannot discuss political issues without escalating and getting out of control? That is tantamount to treating us like children. Nobody ever has to get "caught up," as you put it. One is free at any time to exit a discussion. This back and forth is getting us nowhere. You're the moderator and there's no way anything I say here will change the forum rules. I'll just leave it at this point. No, sad experience... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayD28 Posted February 1, 2017 Share #28 Posted February 1, 2017 Jaap, I don't know how much (or little, or if any) you are paid, but I wouldn't want your job for anything. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter H Posted February 1, 2017 Share #29 Posted February 1, 2017 (edited) I wish it were that simple. We have had to ban too many valuable members over silly disputes, not to mention that the moderators prefer to participate in the forum instead of having to act like schoolmasters in playground squabbles. I sympathise with this but it's still irritating that playground squabbles that become quite unpleasant sail by in other parts of the forum whereas political discussion gets shut down in anticipation of comparable unpleasantness. My other (minor, in this context) concern that I know cannot taken into account as long as there is such a rule in place, but which makes the rule unbalanced, is the fact that a lot of political points are made in non-political language, all the time. I think the distinction between overtly partisan politics and the more pervasive value-based expression and exchange of assumptions and assertions is largely artificial. I don't think the forum benefits from the rule, though I understand why it might be seen to on the surface. Edited February 1, 2017 by Peter H 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbo Posted February 1, 2017 Share #30 Posted February 1, 2017 I think consistency across the forum might go some way to reducing flare ups. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted February 3, 2017 Share #31 Posted February 3, 2017 Consistency is found in the generally light touch of the moderators. We judge each case on its potential of getting out of hand, based on experience. However, we need a fixed rule to base our decisions on. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.